10.07.2015 Views

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Perversion</strong> 49Lacan tells us, we come into <strong>the</strong> world offering ourselves up as partialobjects to <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r's desire (Écrits, 582; 225), hoping to be <strong>the</strong> objectof <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r's desire, to win <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r's desire; and <strong>the</strong> pervert—whose fa<strong>the</strong>r's desire is not terribly pronounced it would seem—"identifieswith <strong>the</strong> imaginary object of [his mo<strong>the</strong>r's] desire, insofar as sheherself symbolizes it in <strong>the</strong> phallus" (Écrits, 554; 198). In o<strong>the</strong>r words,<strong>the</strong> imaginary object of <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's desire here is <strong>the</strong> phallus—not as adisplaceable symbol, in <strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r might desire, say, all<strong>the</strong> trappings of status, all socially valorized objects, or a husband (orboyfriend or whatever) who resembles socially accepted images of "realmen," sometime "possessors" of <strong>the</strong> phallus, but as an unsymbolized,nonfungible, undisplaceable object—and <strong>the</strong> child attempts to becomeit for her. He attempts to be her little prized possession, her little substitutepenis, as Freud might have put it, and <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r often does notcare to interfere (perhaps preferring to be left alone) or is ineffectual inhis attempts to interfere.We can represent <strong>the</strong> pervert's situation as shown in Figure 1.<strong>Perversion</strong>Neurosisf a) O<strong>the</strong>r )When we compare this configuration with that of neurosis, we see that<strong>the</strong> pervert's "subject position" does not entail something outside orbeyond <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r. Instead <strong>the</strong> pervert, as subject, plays <strong>the</strong> role of object:<strong>the</strong> object that fills <strong>the</strong> void in <strong>the</strong> mO<strong>the</strong>r. A first division in <strong>the</strong>O<strong>the</strong>r has occurred for <strong>the</strong> pervert, graphically speaking: <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r isnot whole; his mO<strong>the</strong>r is lacking in something, wants for something.To <strong>the</strong> question, "What am I?" <strong>the</strong> pervert responds, "I am that," thatsomething she is lacking. Thus, for <strong>the</strong> pervert, <strong>the</strong>re is no persistentquestion of being—in o<strong>the</strong>r words, no persistent question regarding hisraison d'être.To separate <strong>the</strong> boy from his mo<strong>the</strong>r here would entail forcing him tostop being <strong>the</strong> phallus so he can have it, stop being <strong>the</strong> imaginary phallusin order to obtain a symbolic one (through <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r's recognition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!