10.07.2015 Views

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 Bruce Fink' <strong>the</strong> law." This particular formulation applies better to <strong>the</strong> masochistthan to <strong>the</strong> sadist or fetishist, as we shall see, but suffices to indicate* that disavowal implies a certain staging or making believe regarding <strong>the</strong>paternal function.Refusing <strong>the</strong> sacrificeThe notion of sacrifice or exaction is certainly not absent from Freud'swork on perversion, and one of <strong>the</strong> places we see it most clearly isin Freud's discussions of <strong>the</strong> "splitting of <strong>the</strong> ego." A splitting of <strong>the</strong>"* ego, Freud postulates, occurs in perversion, not in neurosis. In neurosis,contradictory thoughts are situated at different levels, in different agencies.For example, "I want to sleep with my sister-in-law" is repressedand persists in <strong>the</strong> unconscious, while <strong>the</strong> idea "I don't want to sleepwith my sister-in-law" is what becomes conscious. 17 In perversion, on<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> ego itself splits (SE XXIII, 204), and contradictoryideas—a woman both does and does not have a penis—are maintainedside by side in <strong>the</strong> same agency. 18 Freud refers to this as a partial "turningaway from reality" (SE XXIII, 277) by <strong>the</strong> ego, a procedure he wouldprefer to reserve for psychosis. Yet <strong>the</strong> description he provides of <strong>the</strong>case on which he bases his notion of splitting (SE XXIII, 276-78) differslittle from cases of repression; for, in <strong>the</strong> former, <strong>the</strong> repressed returnsin <strong>the</strong> guise of two symptoms (<strong>the</strong> man's fear that his fa<strong>the</strong>r will punishhim for continued masturbation, and "an anxious susceptibility againstei<strong>the</strong>r of his little toes being touched"). Symptom formation requires, asFreud himself teaches us (SE XVI, 358-59), two different agencies thatare at odds—ego and id, or conscious and unconscious—and we seemto have nei<strong>the</strong>r more nor less than <strong>the</strong> conditions of neurosis here: <strong>the</strong>splitting of <strong>the</strong> "I" (Ich) into conscious and unconscious due to repression.But let's take a closer look at this supposed case of splitting to seewhere renunciation comes in ("instinctual renunciation," as it is translatedin <strong>the</strong> Standard Edition, though it is a question of renouncing <strong>the</strong>pleasure provided by <strong>the</strong> drives). A young boy, early "acquainted with<strong>the</strong> female genitals through being seduced by an older girl," takes pleasurein touching his own genitals after relations with <strong>the</strong> older girl arebroken off. One day his nurse catches him doing it and tells him hisfa<strong>the</strong>r will "cut it off" if he does not stop. Freud tells us: "The usual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!