Perversion the Social Relation
Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation
42. Bruce FinkThus, what is involved here is not perception per se—as Freud says,it is not as if there were a scotoma or black spot on the retina, impedingthe fetishist from seeing what is there to be seen, stopping him fromreceiving certain photons—but a thought related to a particular perception.Seeing is not believing.Freud's 1938 distinction between repression as related to the internalworld and disavowal as related to the external world is reminiscent ofhis 192.4 distinction between "neurotic anxiety" and "realistic anxiety."Neurotic anxiety stems from an internal danger—that is, an impulsewithin the patient that is considered inappropriate by the patient's ownego or superego—whereas realistic anxiety (which Freud also refers toas "fear") stems from a real external danger (SE XXII, 81-89). Insofar,however, as disavowal clearly involves a thought related to a perception—thatis, something generally considered to be inside the subject,part of his or her psychical reality—not a perception alone, 11 theinternal-versus-external distinction breaks down. 12 Both repression anddisavowal involve thoughts, not perceptions.Having discussed the overriding importance of psychical reality andthe social/linguistic constitution of reality compared to some sort of objectivistview of reality, I will restate Freud's distinction as follows: inrepression, the thought associated with one of the patient's own drives isput out of mind, whereas in disavowal a thought, or complex of thoughts—related to a perception of the female genitals, to the father's supposedcastration threat (issued to keep the boy away from his mother and tokeep him from masturbating), and to the patient's narcissistic attachmentto his penis—is put out of mind.A first symbolizationOne of the important things to note here is that, if what is put out ofmind is a thought, then at least a first symbolization has taken place: inperversion, something related to the father and his will to separate hisson from the mother is symbolized, and thus, in contrast to psychosis,an initial acceptance or admission (Bejahung) of the father as symbolicseparator takes place. Basing our theorization on Freud's clinical observationsabout the perverse patients he treated, we can assert that thefather is symbolized to at least some extent because of the castration-
Perversion 43related symptoms that form. 13 Yet this symbolization is not as completeas that achieved in neurosis.Since my goal here is not to exhaustively critique Freud's inconclusivedefinitions of disavowal as a mechanism that clearly differs from repression,I will first indicate what I think we can take disavowal to refer toin the context of Lacan's thought (though to the best of my knowledgeLacan never formulates it as I am going to) and then I will try to translatesome of Freud's discussions into Lacanian terms, that is, in terms of theOther and the sacrifice of jouissance. My claim here is that disavowal isa mechanism that can be clearly distinguished from repression.Like foreclosure and primal repression, disavowal concerns the father:the father's desire, the father's name, and the father's law. The threemechanisms that constitute the three essential psychoanalytic categories—neurosis, psychosis, and perversion—all concern the paternal function(typically fulfilled by a child's father in our society). This point is notnearly as clear in Freud's work as it is in Lacan's, and thus Lacan can beseen to have systematized Freud's work in this respect. 14As we saw in chapter 7, while Freud maintains that paranoia (oneof the psychoses) results from a defense against homosexual urges (SEXVI, 308), Lacan says that homosexuality is not irrelevant to the understandingof psychosis but rather a consequence of the foreclosure of theName of the Father. The defense against homosexuality turns out to bea byproduct of foreclosure, not the cause of psychosis. Similarly, Freud'snotion that the fetish object is related in the fetishist's mind to the socalledmaternal phallus is not irrelevant from a Lacanian perspective,but is, rather, understandable in terms of the father, his desire, and hislaw. Belief in the maternal phallus suggests, as we shall see, that themother's desire-engendering lack has not been canceled out or named bythe father as it is in neurosis. 15 In other words, Lacan does not considerFreud's observation irrelevant but subsumes it within a larger theoreticalframework.From a Lacanian perspective, the apparent contradiction inherent indisavowal can, it seems to me, be described as follows: "I know full wellthat my father hasn't forced me to give up my mother and the jouissanceI take in her presence (real and/or imagined in fantasy) hasn't exactedthe 'pound of flesh,' u but I'm going to stage such an exaction or forcingwith someone who stands in for him; I'll make that person pronounce
- Page 1 and 2: PerversiontheSocial RelationMolly A
- Page 3: AcknowledgmentsixMolly Anne Rothenb
- Page 9 and 10: Molly Anne Rothenbergand Dennis Fos
- Page 11 and 12: Introduction 3necessary passage thr
- Page 13 and 14: Introduction 5jectivity, where enco
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction 7The Potential of Perv
- Page 17 and 18: Introduction 9fact, they are necess
- Page 19 and 20: Introductionnoperate in both desire
- Page 21 and 22: Introduction 13the individual or, b
- Page 23 and 24: W.S.Dennis FosterShortly before the
- Page 25 and 26: Fatal West 17Like Poe's perverse un
- Page 27 and 28: Fatal West 19cost is no reliable gu
- Page 29 and 30: Fatal West 21of limiting, castratin
- Page 31 and 32: Fatal West 23out in the next paragr
- Page 33 and 34: Fatal West 25Burroughs does not sug
- Page 35 and 36: Fatal West 27is associated with Ame
- Page 37 and 38: Fatal West 2,9tiginous sensation of
- Page 39 and 40: Fatal West 31his characters from bo
- Page 41 and 42: Fatal West 33We should not be surpr
- Page 43 and 44: Fatal West 35Burroughs's curious pr
- Page 45 and 46: Fatal West 377 For a good summary o
- Page 47 and 48: Perversion 39The Core of Human Sexu
- Page 49: Perversion 41tions two examples of
- Page 53 and 54: Perversion 45result of the fright o
- Page 55 and 56: Perversion 47To return to the quest
- Page 57 and 58: Perversion 49Lacan tells us, we com
- Page 59 and 60: Perversion 51tern. Lacan's often-re
- Page 61 and 62: Perversion 53Father's "No!"Mother a
- Page 63 and 64: Perversion 55the pervert's sexualit
- Page 65 and 66: Perversion 57power when a judge all
- Page 67 and 68: Perversion 59sions—when allowed t
- Page 69 and 70: Perversion 61in their detailed disc
- Page 71 and 72: Perversion 63simultaneously a recog
- Page 73 and 74: Perversion 6$31 Consider, in the fo
- Page 75 and 76: Perversion6jto all cases); but mora
- Page 77 and 78: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 79 and 80: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 81 and 82: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 83 and 84: "I Know Well, but All the Same .. .
- Page 85 and 86: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 87 and 88: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 89 and 90: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 91 and 92: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 93 and 94: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 95 and 96: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 97 and 98: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 99 and 100: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
42. Bruce FinkThus, what is involved here is not perception per se—as Freud says,it is not as if <strong>the</strong>re were a scotoma or black spot on <strong>the</strong> retina, impeding<strong>the</strong> fetishist from seeing what is <strong>the</strong>re to be seen, stopping him fromreceiving certain photons—but a thought related to a particular perception.Seeing is not believing.Freud's 1938 distinction between repression as related to <strong>the</strong> internalworld and disavowal as related to <strong>the</strong> external world is reminiscent ofhis 192.4 distinction between "neurotic anxiety" and "realistic anxiety."Neurotic anxiety stems from an internal danger—that is, an impulsewithin <strong>the</strong> patient that is considered inappropriate by <strong>the</strong> patient's ownego or superego—whereas realistic anxiety (which Freud also refers toas "fear") stems from a real external danger (SE XXII, 81-89). Insofar,however, as disavowal clearly involves a thought related to a perception—thatis, something generally considered to be inside <strong>the</strong> subject,part of his or her psychical reality—not a perception alone, 11 <strong>the</strong>internal-versus-external distinction breaks down. 12 Both repression anddisavowal involve thoughts, not perceptions.Having discussed <strong>the</strong> overriding importance of psychical reality and<strong>the</strong> social/linguistic constitution of reality compared to some sort of objectivistview of reality, I will restate Freud's distinction as follows: inrepression, <strong>the</strong> thought associated with one of <strong>the</strong> patient's own drives isput out of mind, whereas in disavowal a thought, or complex of thoughts—related to a perception of <strong>the</strong> female genitals, to <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r's supposedcastration threat (issued to keep <strong>the</strong> boy away from his mo<strong>the</strong>r and tokeep him from masturbating), and to <strong>the</strong> patient's narcissistic attachmentto his penis—is put out of mind.A first symbolizationOne of <strong>the</strong> important things to note here is that, if what is put out ofmind is a thought, <strong>the</strong>n at least a first symbolization has taken place: inperversion, something related to <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r and his will to separate hisson from <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r is symbolized, and thus, in contrast to psychosis,an initial acceptance or admission (Bejahung) of <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r as symbolicseparator takes place. Basing our <strong>the</strong>orization on Freud's clinical observationsabout <strong>the</strong> perverse patients he treated, we can assert that <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>r is symbolized to at least some extent because of <strong>the</strong> castration-