Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation

ideiaeideologia.com
from ideiaeideologia.com More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

i8Dennis Fostersity, it is because the world he represents also stages sublime enjoymentwithin the contradictions and inverted metaphors of social normalcy.Burroughs fascinates, despite his failures of rational criticism andhis at times repellent aesthetics, because he so clearly delights in theviolence, sexuality, and bodily luxuriances of disease, beauty, intoxication,and excess that attend the ugly spirit. His subscriptions to GunWorld, American Survival Guide, and Soldier of Fortune (Miles 2-3), forexample, flaunt an enjoyment of violent technologies that finds its expressionin the various gun-toting figures of his fiction and in his ownlove of weapons. His misogyny includes an appreciation of homosexualeroticism so boisterous that it leaves no room for women. We might askwith Dolan whether Burroughs's ultimate love of narrative inevitably entangleshim in the longings and delusions of the Aristotelian construct,but the political question is whether such conformity with the ugly spiritof the West implies his unwitting accord with that spirit.When Slavoj Èizek adopts the term "cynical reasoning" to describemuch contemporary thought, both popular and professional, he movesa step beyond the stoical position of "suspicion," the resistance of thosewho would not be duped by delusions of authority. 4 The cynic, by contrast,while not duped, lives as if he were: "I know very well, but allthe same. . . ." He stops doubting and resigns himself to living underdemands he can never hope to fulfill. 5 He sees the cultural superego'sinjunctions to be honest, generous, and dutiful as a fool's game, but onehe continues to play without being tormented by an awareness of itsfalsity. As discouraging as it is to deal with such cynics in daily life—it is futile to argue with someone holding this view—an avowed cynicismhas the advantage of clarifying the subject's motives: just followthe stupid rules as if they were real, and you get real rewards. Women'smagazines have long given a version of such advice to women, tellingthem that men care only for the appearance of virtue. Marabel Morgangoes so far as to suggest to women that if they merely tell their men thatthey admire them (even though they do not deserve admiration), theycan make their husbands love them (64). Cynical reasoning has beeneasily adopted by popular culture for men as well: "My father alwayssaid, 'buy the best and you'll never be disappointed,' " says the son ofwealth in an advertisement for high end commodities, repeating a claimthat is effective despite its obvious fraudulence: "I know very well that

Fatal West 19cost is no reliable guarantee of quality, nevertheless, when I spend moreI feel as if I have the best." Although the consumer is bound to be disappointed(since consumption never removes desire), the advertisementhelps transform the commodity into a fetish, that is, into a thing thatcan provide a perverse enjoyment, despite the lack of satisfaction.Cynical reason returns the reasoner, surprisingly, to the Cartesianposition of stupid obedience: in the absence of certainty, it is better tofollow the rules. However, where Descartes gave his obedience to thelaws of the kingdom, contemporary ideology dictates that reason guideone to pursue wealth and self-interest. The tremendous appeal of sucha position is that merely by following duty, reason, and common sense,one incidentally accrues not only wealth and position but the special rewardsthat come to those who adhere most strictly to duty. Those fortunateenough to escape poverty, for example, often find themselves, asa matter of civic duty, in the position of disciplining the poor. Theirmethods may be doomed to fail (choosing not to feed the children ofthe poor does not usually make such children into productive membersof society), but the experience of inflicting suffering on others can stillmake the job rewarding. It is difficult to subvert those systems (such asthe prison system or the campaigns against imported drugs) that seem toaccept as a working principle that they will be ineffective. Burroughs'swork seems, rather, to celebrate aspects of modern culture that are oftenacknowledged (sadly, hostilely, sardonically) to fail. However, he takesas the motive of cultural activity not its intentions to improve life, butits capacity to produce enjoyment. The evil of the ugly spirit does notlie in its capacity to produce perverse enjoyment but in its failure to recognizethat perversity is what sustains it. Burroughs's achievement is toinvert the terms of Western history, imagining a culture developing notout of its impulses toward spirit or wealth, but out of the impulse towardenjoyment and a denial of the legitimacy of all authority.Retrospective UtopiaCities of the Red Night imagines an alternative history of the Westernworld from one hundred thousand years ago, developing out of the Eurasianplains and reaching into the Americas. This history gives no senseof a Utopian past, however, no moment when life was sweet and from

i8Dennis Fostersity, it is because <strong>the</strong> world he represents also stages sublime enjoymentwithin <strong>the</strong> contradictions and inverted metaphors of social normalcy.Burroughs fascinates, despite his failures of rational criticism andhis at times repellent aes<strong>the</strong>tics, because he so clearly delights in <strong>the</strong>violence, sexuality, and bodily luxuriances of disease, beauty, intoxication,and excess that attend <strong>the</strong> ugly spirit. His subscriptions to GunWorld, American Survival Guide, and Soldier of Fortune (Miles 2-3), forexample, flaunt an enjoyment of violent technologies that finds its expressionin <strong>the</strong> various gun-toting figures of his fiction and in his ownlove of weapons. His misogyny includes an appreciation of homosexualeroticism so boisterous that it leaves no room for women. We might askwith Dolan whe<strong>the</strong>r Burroughs's ultimate love of narrative inevitably entangleshim in <strong>the</strong> longings and delusions of <strong>the</strong> Aristotelian construct,but <strong>the</strong> political question is whe<strong>the</strong>r such conformity with <strong>the</strong> ugly spiritof <strong>the</strong> West implies his unwitting accord with that spirit.When Slavoj Èizek adopts <strong>the</strong> term "cynical reasoning" to describemuch contemporary thought, both popular and professional, he movesa step beyond <strong>the</strong> stoical position of "suspicion," <strong>the</strong> resistance of thosewho would not be duped by delusions of authority. 4 The cynic, by contrast,while not duped, lives as if he were: "I know very well, but all<strong>the</strong> same. . . ." He stops doubting and resigns himself to living underdemands he can never hope to fulfill. 5 He sees <strong>the</strong> cultural superego'sinjunctions to be honest, generous, and dutiful as a fool's game, but onehe continues to play without being tormented by an awareness of itsfalsity. As discouraging as it is to deal with such cynics in daily life—it is futile to argue with someone holding this view—an avowed cynicismhas <strong>the</strong> advantage of clarifying <strong>the</strong> subject's motives: just follow<strong>the</strong> stupid rules as if <strong>the</strong>y were real, and you get real rewards. Women'smagazines have long given a version of such advice to women, telling<strong>the</strong>m that men care only for <strong>the</strong> appearance of virtue. Marabel Morgangoes so far as to suggest to women that if <strong>the</strong>y merely tell <strong>the</strong>ir men that<strong>the</strong>y admire <strong>the</strong>m (even though <strong>the</strong>y do not deserve admiration), <strong>the</strong>ycan make <strong>the</strong>ir husbands love <strong>the</strong>m (64). Cynical reasoning has beeneasily adopted by popular culture for men as well: "My fa<strong>the</strong>r alwayssaid, 'buy <strong>the</strong> best and you'll never be disappointed,' " says <strong>the</strong> son ofwealth in an advertisement for high end commodities, repeating a claimthat is effective despite its obvious fraudulence: "I know very well that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!