Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation

ideiaeideologia.com
from ideiaeideologia.com More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

204 E. L. McCallumtotle. What is important here, however, is that in contrast to the deathdrive, the life drive is that principle that exceeds language; we mightposit that it is the "beyond" of the Teutonophilic principle. Coincidenceonly operates within a field of dispersion. :Yet, just as White Noise's apparent delineation of the death drive isnot so direct after all, Accident is not a straightforward text. And whatwould seem to be most deadly on the thematic level—a cloud of radioactivitymoving across the countryside, contaminating as it goes—turnsout, on further analysis, to be more closely connected to the text's delineationof the life drive: the cloud's drive to merge with the greens,the milk, the fats stored in the body of the German in 198e. The narrative'scomplications drive us to understand how contamination instigatesa reversal of our notions of thanatos and eros. Although we aremore likely to associate contamination with death, not love or life, thisday's news suggests that the binding force of particle seeking particle,the discharge of a toxic cloud, might be more deeply embedded in oureros than language or narrative will countenance. It might leave us withanother, more familiar but perverted Freudian question: What does contaminationwant?Contamination inevitably bodes change, and the response to contaminationarguably incites the death drive, the attempt to resolve thedisruption and return to a previous equilibrium; paradoxically, then,contamination would be opposed to the death drive. Moreover, sincecontamination's change is independent of human intentionality—contaminationmay be an accident, or an inadvertent side effect of betterliving through chemistry—it offers a compelling figureof a nonindividualizedagency. The particles of contamination are driven by that force ofcontamination to transform, not to end or to rejuvenate. Shifting fromindividuals to particles presents a model for examining perversion thatdoes not rely on the subject for its basis, but on the systems and forcesin which subjects are constructed and embedded, the very systems thateither guarantee or disrupt the subject's coherence. Undergirding thisdrive of transformation, which works upon both the death drive and thelife drive, is a paradigm of life as pixelated, the various particles seekingto bind—but in what combinations? what manner? what ways?—andour sense of self, agency, and mastery only pieced together like a viewof a Seurat painting from afar.

Contamination's Germinations 205Accident demarcates the traces of the life drive's combinatory intriguesand favors a dissolution of the boundaries between self and other thatairborne toxic events similarly give the lie to on a national scale. The textis punctuated by reports on the radio—itself no less a diffusive mediumthan the radioactive cloud, functioning just as much to bond, conjugate,transform. If the radio is an obvious parallel to the radioactive cloudbothsharing the first five letters, both particles of sound or matter operatingin a combination of diffusion and focused coalescence—the textalso features a less obvious parallel in the telephone calls that pepper thetext. The telephone particle-izes: it restricts the sound traveling betweentwo specific parties, caller and receiver, to a narrow bandwidth of information;it interrupts the flow of the narrative or of life; it invades withoutseeming invasive. Both the radio and the telephone, as the mirror of thecontamination drive of the invisible cloud, offer us the difference of discourse,but more importandy narration. Through the telephone calls, thenarrator can bring us the ongoing story of the brother's surgery; throughthe radio the narrator brings us the representation of the contamination.Insofar as both communications technologies serve as language vectors,they function to contaminate, to disperse meaning across the boundariesof individuals spatially separated from one another.Joan Copjec has claimed that "it is the real that unites the psychical tothe social, that this relation is ruled by the death drive." 31 If she's right,what does this mean for perversion? And how might this affect our readingof contamination, which, if I may conflate the psychoanalytical withthe colloquial, could not be more real. Copjec's argument emphasizesthe linchpin role of the death drive—but what does it mean to rule therelation between the psychical and the social? Here's where my crackpotnotion of Teutonophilia comes in. I was obviously glib when I positedabove that the radioactive cloud, the airborne toxic event, was Teutonophilic;certainly the affinity for things German is a convenient paradigmfor an instinct to bond that models a nonhuman agency or subjectivity.And the claim that we understand Teutonophilia not as a drive to be Germanbut to be a germ passed perhaps too quickly as well; it illustrates thefragmentation, particle-ization of dispersion at the expense of calling attentionto the transformative effects of germs. But what Teutonophiliain these texts indicates is the drive to disperse change through language,and this is in some ways inherent in the drive to narrate.

204 E. L. McCallumtotle. What is important here, however, is that in contrast to <strong>the</strong> deathdrive, <strong>the</strong> life drive is that principle that exceeds language; we mightposit that it is <strong>the</strong> "beyond" of <strong>the</strong> Teutonophilic principle. Coincidenceonly operates within a field of dispersion. :Yet, just as White Noise's apparent delineation of <strong>the</strong> death drive isnot so direct after all, Accident is not a straightforward text. And whatwould seem to be most deadly on <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic level—a cloud of radioactivitymoving across <strong>the</strong> countryside, contaminating as it goes—turnsout, on fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis, to be more closely connected to <strong>the</strong> text's delineationof <strong>the</strong> life drive: <strong>the</strong> cloud's drive to merge with <strong>the</strong> greens,<strong>the</strong> milk, <strong>the</strong> fats stored in <strong>the</strong> body of <strong>the</strong> German in 198e. The narrative'scomplications drive us to understand how contamination instigatesa reversal of our notions of thanatos and eros. Although we aremore likely to associate contamination with death, not love or life, thisday's news suggests that <strong>the</strong> binding force of particle seeking particle,<strong>the</strong> discharge of a toxic cloud, might be more deeply embedded in oureros than language or narrative will countenance. It might leave us withano<strong>the</strong>r, more familiar but perverted Freudian question: What does contaminationwant?Contamination inevitably bodes change, and <strong>the</strong> response to contaminationarguably incites <strong>the</strong> death drive, <strong>the</strong> attempt to resolve <strong>the</strong>disruption and return to a previous equilibrium; paradoxically, <strong>the</strong>n,contamination would be opposed to <strong>the</strong> death drive. Moreover, sincecontamination's change is independent of human intentionality—contaminationmay be an accident, or an inadvertent side effect of betterliving through chemistry—it offers a compelling figureof a nonindividualizedagency. The particles of contamination are driven by that force ofcontamination to transform, not to end or to rejuvenate. Shifting fromindividuals to particles presents a model for examining perversion thatdoes not rely on <strong>the</strong> subject for its basis, but on <strong>the</strong> systems and forcesin which subjects are constructed and embedded, <strong>the</strong> very systems thatei<strong>the</strong>r guarantee or disrupt <strong>the</strong> subject's coherence. Undergirding thisdrive of transformation, which works upon both <strong>the</strong> death drive and <strong>the</strong>life drive, is a paradigm of life as pixelated, <strong>the</strong> various particles seekingto bind—but in what combinations? what manner? what ways?—andour sense of self, agency, and mastery only pieced toge<strong>the</strong>r like a viewof a Seurat painting from afar.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!