10.07.2015 Views

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 James Penneywhich underscores <strong>the</strong> dimension of Gilles's perversion that solicited <strong>the</strong>transferential identification characterizing <strong>the</strong> public's response:After having exhorted <strong>the</strong>m thus, Gilles got down on his knees,folding his hands toge<strong>the</strong>r, begging God's mercy, praying to Himto be willing to punish <strong>the</strong>m not according to <strong>the</strong>ir misdeeds, but,being merciful, to let <strong>the</strong>m profit by <strong>the</strong> grace in which he put histrust, telling <strong>the</strong> people that as a Christian, he was <strong>the</strong>ir bro<strong>the</strong>r, andurging <strong>the</strong>m and those among <strong>the</strong>m whose children he had killed,for <strong>the</strong> love of Our Lord's suffering to be willing to pray to God forhim and to forgive him freely, in <strong>the</strong> same way that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>mselvesintended God to forgive and have mercy on <strong>the</strong>mselves. Recommendinghimself to holy Monsignor Jacques, whom he had alwaysheld in singular affection, and also to holy Monsignor Michel, begging<strong>the</strong>m in his hour of great need to be willing to help him, aidhim, and pray to God for him, despite <strong>the</strong> fact that he had notobeyed <strong>the</strong>m as he should have. He fur<strong>the</strong>r requested that <strong>the</strong> instanthis soul left his body, it might please holy Monsignor Michelto receive it and present it unto God, whom he begged to take itinto His grace, without punishing it according to its offenses. And<strong>the</strong> said Gilles <strong>the</strong>n made beautiful speeches and prayers to God,recommending his soul to Him. (279; 337)The climactic moment of <strong>the</strong> Gilles de Rais trial brings to its point ofgreatest intensity <strong>the</strong> complicity between, on <strong>the</strong> one hand, Gilles's perversedesire to sacralize himself while <strong>the</strong>atricalizing to <strong>the</strong> utmost hiscriminality and, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> efforts of <strong>the</strong> institutional apparatus of<strong>the</strong> church to consolidate its political power under <strong>the</strong> guise of an ideologyof faith. As far as Gilles is concerned, his final discourse betrays <strong>the</strong>properly perverse short circuit through which his crimes are performedas a means of establishing his innocence before <strong>the</strong> eyes of God. It is preciselyby becoming guiltier before <strong>the</strong> divinity, by performing <strong>the</strong> mosttaboo actions according to church doctrine, that Gilles secures his innocence,and <strong>the</strong>refore his salvation. Gilles performs his crimes, in o<strong>the</strong>rwords, in order to secure <strong>the</strong> guilt from which he will <strong>the</strong>n be able tobeseech God for forgiveness. In ethical terms, Gilles performs evil as ameans of safeguarding <strong>the</strong> good—in this case his favor with respect toGod's grace; he distinguishes himself through evil in order to benefit all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!