10.07.2015 Views

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite 141debauchery, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> very mode of <strong>the</strong>ir devolution into brutality,lawlessness, and excess. Homosexuality thus "facilitated," as Batailleputs it, <strong>the</strong> descent of <strong>the</strong> young feudal warrior into chaotic archaism (31;38). Phobically, Bataille makes Gilles's homosexuality an essential featureof his perversion, a condition of possibility for <strong>the</strong> crimes. Homosexualitybecomes synonymous with transgression, to <strong>the</strong> point that itis impossible to imagine crime—and hence <strong>the</strong> tragic—within Bataille'sframework in <strong>the</strong> absence of its homosexual element. Clearly, this isano<strong>the</strong>r danger of Bataille's historicist understanding of tragedy. Since<strong>the</strong> tragic mode for Bataille features concrete and particular historicalcontent, Bataille is able to make homosexuality itself an attribute of<strong>the</strong> historical dislocation of <strong>the</strong> feudal social structure in late medievalculture. This gesture not only implies a highly problematic historicistunderstanding of homosexuality that collapses homosexual desire intoits concrete historical manifestations, 21 but also relates homosexualityin an essential, necessary way to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes of decadence, lateness, profligacy,and excess with which Bataille describes <strong>the</strong> feudal aristocracyin mid-fifteenth-century France. 22Thus, it is precisely Bataille's symptomatic o<strong>the</strong>ring of Gilles—<strong>the</strong>facility, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, with which his suggestive gestures toward <strong>the</strong>notion of a universally shared human monstrosity or radical evil 23 devolveinto accounts of Gilles's idiosyncratically diabolical foreignness to<strong>the</strong> human—that prevents him, along with <strong>the</strong> vast majority of <strong>the</strong> trialdocuments' readers, from grasping in its disturbing nuance <strong>the</strong> significanceof <strong>the</strong> audience's transference with respect to Gilles. Bataille willrefer, for example, to <strong>the</strong> "insensitivity" and "indifference" that "situate[Gilles] beyond <strong>the</strong> feelings of ordinary humanity" (16; 20; translationmodified). Here it becomes necessary to inquire after <strong>the</strong> type of objectGilles constituted for his confession's auditors. Bataille, for his part, attributesGilles's apparent seduction of <strong>the</strong> crowd to a strange power ofpersuasion traceable, but not perfectly reducible, to <strong>the</strong> impressivenessof his feudal authority. Of what metaphysical attribute does this charismaticsupplement consist? Bataille explains <strong>the</strong> "compassion" of <strong>the</strong>audience for Gilles de Rais by claiming that its members were able, during<strong>the</strong> trial, "to realize through [<strong>the</strong>ir] tears that this great lord whowas to die, being <strong>the</strong> most notorious of criminals, was like everyone in<strong>the</strong> crowd" (58; 73; translation modified).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!