10.07.2015 Views

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

néSlavoj Èizek<strong>the</strong>m, not in <strong>the</strong> standard way, actively sucking his penis, but so that shelies flat on <strong>the</strong> bed and leans her head over its edge downward into <strong>the</strong>air—when <strong>the</strong> man is penetrating her, her mouth is above her eyes, herface is turned upside down, and <strong>the</strong> effect is one of an uncanny change of<strong>the</strong> human face, <strong>the</strong> seat of subjectivity, into a kind of impersonal suckingmachine being pumped by <strong>the</strong> man's penis. The o<strong>the</strong>r man is meanwhileworking on her vagina, which is also elevated above her head andthus asserted as an autonomous center of jouissance not subordinatedto <strong>the</strong> head. The woman's body is thus transformed into a multitude of"organs without a body," machines of jouissance, while <strong>the</strong> men workingon it are also desubjectivized, instrumentalized, reduced to workersserving <strong>the</strong>se different partial objects. Within such a scene, even whena vagina talks, it is just a "talking head" in <strong>the</strong> same way that any o<strong>the</strong>rorgan simply exerts its function of jouissance. This perverse vision ofbody as a multitude of sites of partial drives, however, is condemned tofailure: it disavows castration. 3How to Dissolve a Masochist Symptom?What, <strong>the</strong>n, does <strong>the</strong> self-beating in Fight Club stand for? In a first approach,it is clear that its fundamental stake is to reach out and reestablish<strong>the</strong> connection with <strong>the</strong> real O<strong>the</strong>r, that is, to suspend <strong>the</strong>fundamental abstraction and coldness of <strong>the</strong> capitalist subjectivity bestexemplified by <strong>the</strong> figure of <strong>the</strong> lone monadic individual who, alone infront of <strong>the</strong> PC screen, communicates with <strong>the</strong> entire world. In contrastto <strong>the</strong> humanitarian compassion that enables us to retain our distancetoward <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> very violence of <strong>the</strong> fight signals <strong>the</strong> abolition ofthis distance. Although this strategy is risky and ambiguous (it can easilyregress into a proto-fascist macho logic of violent male bonding), thisrisk has to be assumed—<strong>the</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>r direct way out of <strong>the</strong> closureof <strong>the</strong> capitalist subjectivity. The first lesson of Fight Club is thus thatone cannot pass directly from capitalist to revolutionary subjectivity: <strong>the</strong>abstraction, <strong>the</strong> foreclosure of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> blindness for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs'suffering and pain, has first to be broken in a risk-taking gesture of directlyreaching toward <strong>the</strong> suffering o<strong>the</strong>r—a gesture that, since it shatters<strong>the</strong> very kernel of our identity, cannot but appear as extremely violent.However, <strong>the</strong>re is ano<strong>the</strong>r dimension at work in self-beating: <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!