Perversion the Social Relation
Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation
Slavoj ÈizekIn Gasparone, a silly German musical from 1937, the young MarikaRoekk, when reproached by her father for treating unkindly her richand powerful fiancé, promptly answers: "I love him, so I have the rightto treat him in any way I want!" There is a truth in this statement: farfrom obliging me to be respectful and considerate (all signals of colddistance), love in a way allows me to dispense with these considerations.Does this mean that love gives me a kind of carte blanche, justifyingevery brutality? No, and therein resides the miracle of love: love sets itsown standards, so that, within a love relationship, it is immediately clearwhen we are dealing with love and when we are not (the same as withpolitically incorrect terms, which can also be used as proof that I am areal friend of the concerned person). As we already learned from Christianity,true love and violence are never simply external to each other—sometimes, violence is the only proof of love. David Fincher's Fight Club(1999), an extraordinary achievement for Hollywood, directly tacklesthis knot of love and violence.The Perverse Organ without a BodyJack, the film's insomniac hero and narrator (superbly played by EdwardNorton), follows his doctor's advice and, in order to discover what truesuffering is, starts visiting the support group of victims of testicular cancer.However, he soon discovers how such practice of the love for one's
The Masochist Social Link 113neighbors relies on a false subjective position (of voyeurist compassion),and soon gets involved in a much more radical exercise. On a flight, hemeets Tyler (Brad Pitt), a charismatic young man who explains to himthe fruitlessness of his life filled with failure and empty consumer culture,and offers him a solution: Why don't they fight, beating each otherto pulp? Gradually, a whole movement develops out of this idea: secretafter-hours boxing matches are held in the basements of bars all aroundthe country. The movement quickly gets politicized, organizing terroristattacks against big corporations. In the middle of the film, there isan almost unbearably painful scene, worthy of the most weird DavidLynch moments, which serves as a kind of clue for the film's final surprisingtwist: in order to blackmail his boss into paying him for notworking, the narrator throws himself around the man's office, beatinghimself bloody before building security arrives; in front of his embarrassedboss, the narrator thus enacts on himself the boss's aggressivitytoward him. The only similar case of self-beating is found in Me, Myself& Irene, in which Officer Charlie Baileygates (Jim Carrey) beats himselfup—here, of course, in a comic (although painfully exaggerated) way,as one part of a split personality pounding the other part. 1 In both films,the self-beating begins with the hero's hand acquiring a life of its own,escaping the hero's control—in short, turning into a partial object, or,to put it with Deleuze, into an organ without a body (the obverse of thebody without an organ). This provides the key to the figureof the doublewith whom, in both films, the hero is fighting: the double, the hero'sIdeal Ego, a spectral/invisible hallucinatory entity, is not simply externalto the hero—its efficiency is inscribed within the hero's body itselfas the autonomization of one of its organs (the hand). The hand actingon its own is the drive ignoring the dialectic of the subject's desire: driveis fundamentally the insistence of an undead "organ without a body,"standing, like Lacan's lamella, for that which the subject had to lose inorder to subjectivize itself in the symbolic space of the sexual difference.What, exactly, is the status of this "organ without a body"? At thebeginning of Monteverdi's Orfeo, the goddess of music introduces herselfwith the words "Io sono la musica." Is this not something whichsoon afterward, when "psychological" subjects had invaded the stage,became unthinkable, or, rather, irrepresentable? One had to wait untilthe 1930s for such strange creatures to reappear on the stage—in Bertolt
- Page 69 and 70: Perversion 61in their detailed disc
- Page 71 and 72: Perversion 63simultaneously a recog
- Page 73 and 74: Perversion 6$31 Consider, in the fo
- Page 75 and 76: Perversion6jto all cases); but mora
- Page 77 and 78: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 79 and 80: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 81 and 82: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 83 and 84: "I Know Well, but All the Same .. .
- Page 85 and 86: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 87 and 88: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 89 and 90: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 91 and 92: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 93 and 94: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 95 and 96: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 97 and 98: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 99 and 100: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 101 and 102: ■xetfcMtuateVahMtinNina SchwartzW
- Page 103 and 104: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 95
- Page 105 and 106: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 97
- Page 107 and 108: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 99
- Page 109 and 110: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 111 and 112: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 113 and 114: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 115 and 116: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 117 and 118: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 119: Exotic Rituals and Family Valuesin9
- Page 123 and 124: The Masochist Social Link 115"make
- Page 125 and 126: The Masochist Social Link 117subjec
- Page 127 and 128: The Masochist Social Link 119ized a
- Page 129 and 130: The Masochist Social Link 121subjec
- Page 131 and 132: The Masochist Social Link 123to act
- Page 133 and 134: The Masochist Social Link 1259 Bule
- Page 135 and 136: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite1
- Page 137 and 138: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 139 and 140: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 141 and 142: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 143 and 144: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 145 and 146: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 147 and 148: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 149 and 150: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 151 and 152: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 153 and 154: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 155 and 156: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 157 and 158: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 159 and 160: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 161 and 162: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 163 and 164: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 165 and 166: Confessions of a Medieval Sodomite
- Page 167 and 168: IfSctPrMintoStyrwTsfft*Michael P. B
- Page 169 and 170: "As If Set Free into Another Land"
Slavoj ÈizekIn Gasparone, a silly German musical from 1937, <strong>the</strong> young MarikaRoekk, when reproached by her fa<strong>the</strong>r for treating unkindly her richand powerful fiancé, promptly answers: "I love him, so I have <strong>the</strong> rightto treat him in any way I want!" There is a truth in this statement: farfrom obliging me to be respectful and considerate (all signals of colddistance), love in a way allows me to dispense with <strong>the</strong>se considerations.Does this mean that love gives me a kind of carte blanche, justifyingevery brutality? No, and <strong>the</strong>rein resides <strong>the</strong> miracle of love: love sets itsown standards, so that, within a love relationship, it is immediately clearwhen we are dealing with love and when we are not (<strong>the</strong> same as withpolitically incorrect terms, which can also be used as proof that I am areal friend of <strong>the</strong> concerned person). As we already learned from Christianity,true love and violence are never simply external to each o<strong>the</strong>r—sometimes, violence is <strong>the</strong> only proof of love. David Fincher's Fight Club(1999), an extraordinary achievement for Hollywood, directly tacklesthis knot of love and violence.The Perverse Organ without a BodyJack, <strong>the</strong> film's insomniac hero and narrator (superbly played by EdwardNorton), follows his doctor's advice and, in order to discover what truesuffering is, starts visiting <strong>the</strong> support group of victims of testicular cancer.However, he soon discovers how such practice of <strong>the</strong> love for one's