10.07.2015 Views

caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 8-42006 Region L – Caldwell County Water User Group Population ProjectionsWater User Group 2010 2020 2030 2040RegionSplit 1)CountySplit 2)Aqua WSC 1,782 2,313 2,764 3,217 P PCounty Line WSC 1,262 1,939 2,565 3,193 PCounty-Other 1,229 1,172 1,066 968Creedmoor Maha WSC 2,217 3,015 3,717 4,423 P PGoforth WSC 1,770 2,636 3,429 4,226 P PGonzales County WSC 215 277 329 381 PLockhart 16,328 21,083 25,111 29,154Luling 6,309 7,301 7,998 8,700Martindale 1,150 1,291 1,378 1,465Martindale WSC 1,307 1,468 1,566 1,666 PMaxwell WSC 4,356 6,113 7,685 9,260 PMustang Ridge 555 746 911 1,077 P PNiederwald 203 349 489 629 PPolonia WSC 7,275 10,019 12,451 14,891 P PCaldwell Total 45,958 59,722 71,459 83,250Source: Texas Water Development Board 2006 Regional Water Plan1) If “P” is present in this column, the Water User Group (WUG) is located in more than oneRegion <strong>and</strong> the projections listed in the row represent only the WUG’s population projectionswithin that particular Region, not the WUG’s total population projections. If the “P” is presentfor a <strong>county</strong> total entry, then the <strong>county</strong> has been split by Regional boundaries <strong>and</strong> the projectionslisted in the row represent only the <strong>county</strong>’s populations within the particular Region, not the<strong>county</strong>’s total population projections2) If “P” is present in this column, the Water User Group (WUG) is located in more than one<strong>county</strong> <strong>and</strong> the projections listed in the row represent only the WUG’s population projectionswithin that particular <strong>county</strong>, not the WUG’s total population projections.8.3 Development of Water Dem<strong>and</strong>sMunicipal <strong>water</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s for this <strong>study</strong> were based on information obtained fromthe TWDB, input from the Study Advisory Group <strong>and</strong> the State Demographer.The TWDB population projections for each WUG in Table 8-4 were furtheranalyzed to determine percentages of the total population. The percentagescalculated for each WUG, as shown in Table 8-5, indicated that Luling, Lockhart,<strong>and</strong> Polonia were the greatest <strong>water</strong> users in the <strong>county</strong> <strong>and</strong> accounted for over50% of the population. The TWDB percentages of the WUG were multiplied by8-7Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.000.000Caldwell County Regional Water <strong>and</strong> Waste<strong>water</strong> Planning StudyJanuary 2010Final Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!