caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study
caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study
TABLE 8-1Caldwell County - TWDB Historical Water Use SummaryUnit: Acre Feet (ac-ft)Year Municipal ManufacturingSteamElectricIrrigation Mining Livestock Total1974 3,069 206 0 1,660 70 1,149 6,1541980 4,033 219 0 1,600 0 1,036 6,8881984 5,092 240 0 694 27 834 6,8871985 4,430 224 0 499 27 747 5,9271986 4,483 223 0 500 0 817 6,0231987 4,617 0 0 500 28 803 5,9481988 4,904 0 0 500 25 841 6,2701989 4,855 0 0 1,198 27 827 6,9071990 4,931 0 0 1,375 27 816 7,1491991 4,320 0 0 954 13 836 6,1231992 4,456 0 0 1,513 13 835 6,8171993 4,825 2 0 1,127 12 769 6,7351994 4,718 11 0 1,361 12 890 6,9921995 4,755 10 0 1,696 12 907 7,3801996 5,186 12 0 1,742 12 801 7,7531997 4,584 10 0 1,560 12 869 7,0351998 4,813 8 0 1,705 12 816 7,3541999 4,818 8 0 1,621 12 910 7,3692000 4,929 11 0 989 12 917 6,8582001 4,534 200 0 1,590 6 888 7,2182002 4,311 6 0 1,590 6 958 6,8712003 4,978 0 0 1,065 6 965 7,0142004 4,770 1 0 183 6 1,051 6,011222.4 852Data Source: Texas Water Development BoardKlotz Associates Project No. 0972.000.000January 20108-2Caldwell County Regional Water and Wastewater Planning StudyFinal Report
GRAPH 8-1Caldwell County Historic Water Use9,0008,0007,0006,000Acre Feet5,0004,0003,0002,0001,00001974198019841985198619871988198919901991199219938.2 TWDB Water Use ProjectionsYear19941995199619971998199920002001MiningManufacturingLivestockIrrigationMunicipal200220032004The future water demands in Table 8-2 and Graph 8-2 were developed by theTWDB for Caldwell County. The demands have been estimated up to 2060. Theyears beyond 2040 have been shaded in the table since this study is notconsidering the same planning horizon.The municipal water demand projections show a consistent linear increase from6,306 ac-ft in 2010 to 10,555 ac-ft in 2040. According to the TWDB, themunicipal water demand is based on population and expected water consumptionfor each person with a reduction to account for conservation. The GPCD varied inthe county for each water user group.Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.000.000January 20108-3Caldwell County Regional Water and Wastewater Planning StudyFinal Report
- Page 36 and 37: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 38 and 39: GRAPH 2-1Lockhart, Texas Monthly Av
- Page 40 and 41: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 42 and 43: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 44 and 45: water quality in the county. Finall
- Page 46 and 47: SECTION 4GROUNDWATER4.1 Groundwater
- Page 48 and 49: efore 1953. Deterioration in water
- Page 50 and 51: loose sand. The sand tends to be fr
- Page 52 and 53: 4.3 Groundwater Conservation Distri
- Page 54 and 55: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 56 and 57: support the efforts of PCCD. The di
- Page 58 and 59: SECTION 5SURFACE WATER5.1 GeneralSu
- Page 60 and 61: GRAPH 5-1Caldwell County Total Surf
- Page 62 and 63: GRAPH 5-2TWDB- Caldwell County Hist
- Page 64 and 65: SECTION 6POPULATION6.1 Population P
- Page 66 and 67: GRAPH 6-1TWDB Population Projection
- Page 68 and 69: GRAPH 6-3Texas State Data Center Po
- Page 70 and 71: TABLE 6-2Planning Study Population
- Page 72 and 73: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 74 and 75: 7.1.2 City of LockhartThe City of L
- Page 76 and 77: Neiderwald. The service area in Cal
- Page 78 and 79: purchase capacity of 6.0 MGD. The a
- Page 80 and 81: Lockhart. The plant is capable of d
- Page 82 and 83: In 1994 GBRA began operating the Ci
- Page 84 and 85: 7.3.5 Sweetwater Utility, LLCSweetw
- Page 88 and 89: Municipal water demand projections
- Page 90 and 91: applicable. A “P” in the Region
- Page 92 and 93: the modified TSDC Scenario 1.0, sho
- Page 94 and 95: GRAPH 8-3Caldwell County Survey Res
- Page 96 and 97: GRAPH 8-4Caldwell County Yearly Wat
- Page 98 and 99: espectively from the information pr
- Page 100 and 101: TABLE 9-6Caldwell County Projected
- Page 102 and 103: 10.3 United States Environmental Pr
- Page 104 and 105: 10.4.3 Source Water ProtectionSourc
- Page 106 and 107: 10.6.1 E.coli PotentialIt is estima
- Page 108 and 109: TABLE 10-4Estimated Loadings from U
- Page 110 and 111: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 112 and 113: The proposed GBRA Mid-Basin Project
- Page 114 and 115: 11.1.3 Lower Guadalupe Water Supply
- Page 116 and 117: the maximum available groundwater f
- Page 118 and 119: An ASR is a viable solution. Ground
- Page 120 and 121: The water conservation strategy is
- Page 122 and 123: SECTION 12REGIONAL WATER PLANNING12
- Page 124 and 125: TABLE 12-2Caldwell County Water Sup
- Page 126 and 127: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
- Page 128 and 129: 12.3.2 DistributionThe water will b
- Page 130 and 131: 12.4 Water System Cost EstimatesVar
- Page 132 and 133: 300272GRAPH 13-1Caldwell County OSS
- Page 134 and 135: Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
TABLE 8-1Caldwell County - TWDB Historical Water Use SummaryUnit: Acre Feet (ac-ft)Year Municipal ManufacturingSteamElectricIrrigation Mining Livestock Total1974 3,069 206 0 1,660 70 1,149 6,1541980 4,033 219 0 1,600 0 1,036 6,8881984 5,092 240 0 694 27 834 6,8871985 4,430 224 0 499 27 747 5,9271986 4,483 223 0 500 0 817 6,0231987 4,617 0 0 500 28 803 5,9481988 4,904 0 0 500 25 841 6,2701989 4,855 0 0 1,198 27 827 6,9071990 4,931 0 0 1,375 27 816 7,1491991 4,320 0 0 954 13 836 6,1231992 4,456 0 0 1,513 13 835 6,8171993 4,825 2 0 1,127 12 769 6,7351994 4,718 11 0 1,361 12 890 6,9921995 4,755 10 0 1,696 12 907 7,3801996 5,186 12 0 1,742 12 801 7,7531997 4,584 10 0 1,560 12 869 7,0351998 4,813 8 0 1,705 12 816 7,3541999 4,818 8 0 1,621 12 910 7,3692000 4,929 11 0 989 12 917 6,8582001 4,534 200 0 1,590 6 888 7,2182002 4,311 6 0 1,590 6 958 6,8712003 4,978 0 0 1,065 6 965 7,0142004 4,770 1 0 183 6 1,051 6,011222.4 852Data Source: Texas Water Development BoardKlotz Associates Project No. 0972.000.000January 20108-2Caldwell County Regional Water <strong>and</strong> Waste<strong>water</strong> Planning StudyFinal Report
Change language