caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

State WellNumber672010267201046720108672010967202026720203672020467202056720402672040367204086720501672060167206026720604672070367207046720706672070767207086720801Aquifer Depth Date B/U pH Silica Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Carbonate Bicarb. Sulfate Chloride Fluoride Nitrate124WLCX 300 5 / 7 / 1946 U 20 252 120 153 3.5DissolvedSolidsSpec. CondumhosHardnessas CaCO3% Sodium SAR RSC124WLCX 300 3 / 27 / 1979 B 8.1 23 39 13 182 0 268.48 100 164 0.4 < 0.1 653 1240 150 72 6.45 1.38124WLCX 2 / 2 / 1946 B 4.6 1.9 c 786 30 1082 2 558 2 1916 19 98 77.84 18.35124WLCX 580 3 / 4 / 1964 B 8.6 12 3 1.3 c 756 83 924 0 540 0.2 1849 3140 12 99 96.56 17.65124WLCX 263 3 / 27 / 1979 B 8.5 16 16 6 530 12 915.26 2 320 1.3 < 0.1 1353 2560 64 94 28.68 14.11124WLCX 185 3 / 27 / 1979 B 8.7 13 4 2 648 30 839.6 95 433 1.6 0.3 1639 3045 18 98 66.06 14.4124WLCX 14 7 / 16 / 1946 U 0 62 190 83 76124WLCX 46 7 / 16 / 1946 U 0 410 17 146 9.4124WLCX 360 6 / 11 / 1956 B 24 32 690 0 1020.29 17 599 1863 191 88 21.69 12.89124WLCX 190 6 / 24 / 1964 B 6.6 44 320 88 c 127 0 296.08 467 500 0.5 2 1694 2540 1160 19 1.62 0124WLCX 24 7 / 16 / 1946 U 12 257 60 39 7.6124WLCX 321 11 / 29 / 1963 B 8 15 1 2.3 c 713 0 1010.29 0 520 1.8 1749 3020 11 99 89.69 16.32124WLCX 172 3 / 27 / 1979 B 8.8 13 2.8 1.7 656 37.2 835.94 100 431 1.6 < 0.1 1654 3129 13 99 76.32 14.66124WLCX 19 7 / 3 / 1946 U 0 76 32 78 100124CRRZ 91 4 / 4 / 1947 B 23 10 c 70 0 20 55 116 16 299 547 98 60 3.07 0124CRRZ 80 5 / 7 / 1946 U 0 0 85 69 0124CRRZ 97 4 / 4 / 1947 B 32 22 c 118 0 8.01 185 154 15 529 934 170 60 3.93 0124WLCX 285 5 / 7 / 1946 U 0 837 1 1210 0124WLCX 285 12 / 6 / 1963 B 7.7 13 14 14 c 1510 0 2080.59 0 1180 0 3754 6130 92 97 68.28 32.25124WLCX 19 5 / 7 / 1946 U 0 145 280 246 3124WLCX 200 1 / 23 / 1964 B 8.1 14 1.8 0.4 c 517 0 876.25 125 198 0.7 0.2 1287 2130 6 99 90.78 14.24124WLCX 240 1 / 23 / 1964 B 7.8 13 6 3.2 c 1100 0 1940.55 0.2 590 0.5 2667 4270 28 98 90.21 31.24124WLCX 81 5 / 7 / 1946 U 0 944 55 215 0* Depth value here reflects the bottom of the SAMPLED INT ERVAL which was different from the completed well depthMonday, March 02, 2009 created by the Texas Water Development BoardPage 15 of 16
State WellNumber6720802672110467212026721203672130267213036721401Aquifer Depth Date B/U pH Silica Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Carbonate Bicarb. Sulfate Chloride Fluoride Nitrate124CRRZ 120 5 / 3 / 1946 U 0 29 14 57 0DissolvedSolidsSpec. CondumhosHardnessas CaCO3% Sodium SAR RSC124WLCX 200 1 / 23 / 1964 B 6.2 30 16 14 c 41 0 80.02 23 68 0.1 0.2 231 399 97 47 1.81 0124WLCX 200 7 / 29 / 1977 B 7.1 66 132 29 52 0 141.56 315 88 0.7 < 0.4 752 1290 448 20 1.07 0124CRRZ 300 6 / 20 / 1964 B 4.3 50 13 5.2 23 9.5 0 0 59 44 0 0 203 303 53 48 1.37 0124CRRZ 300 7 / 29 / 1977 B 6.7 48 35 7 26 10 0 23.19 105 39 0.2 < 0.4 282 438 116 32 1.05 0124CRRZ 157 5 / 17 / 1946 U 0 109 360 165 0124CRRZ 381 5 / 2 / 1978 B 7.2 41 138 22 74 0 128.14 308 112 0.2 < 0.4 758 1352 435 27 1.54 0124CRRZ 334 1 / 10 / 1964 B 7.6 17 48 30 c 78 0 334.09 18 85 0.3 0 440 771 243 41 2.18 0.61124QNCT 148 1 / 10 / 1964 B 6.4 33 430 148 137 23 0 100.03 1440 365 2 2627 3250 1681 15 1.45 0124WLCX 440 12 / 31 / 1963 B 4.8 47 6.2 2.6 c 27 0 0 32 37 0.1 0.2 152 224 26 69 2.25 0* Depth value here reflects the bottom of the SAMPLED INT ERVAL which was different from the completed well depthMonday, March 02, 2009 created by the Texas Water Development BoardPage 16 of 16
Page 1 and 2:
CALDWELL COUNTY REGIONAL WATERAND W
Page 4 and 5:
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
flows without impacting environment
Page 18 and 19:
viable for Caldwell County are wate
Page 20 and 21:
parameters and needs. For purposes
Page 22 and 23:
SECTION 1INTRODUCTION1.1 Background
Page 24 and 25:
A Grant Application for a Regional
Page 26 and 27:
1.4 Participants and SponsorsThe Ca
Page 28 and 29:
SECTION 2CALDWELLL COUNTY CHARACTER
Page 30 and 31:
Construction for segments 5 and 6 o
Page 32 and 33:
Watershed and Peach Creek Watershed
Page 34 and 35:
2.4 Certificates of Convenience and
Page 36 and 37:
Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
Page 38 and 39:
GRAPH 2-1Lockhart, Texas Monthly Av
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
water quality in the county. Finall
Page 46 and 47:
SECTION 4GROUNDWATER4.1 Groundwater
Page 48 and 49:
efore 1953. Deterioration in water
Page 50 and 51:
loose sand. The sand tends to be fr
Page 52 and 53:
4.3 Groundwater Conservation Distri
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
support the efforts of PCCD. The di
Page 58 and 59:
SECTION 5SURFACE WATER5.1 GeneralSu
Page 60 and 61:
GRAPH 5-1Caldwell County Total Surf
Page 62 and 63:
GRAPH 5-2TWDB- Caldwell County Hist
Page 64 and 65:
SECTION 6POPULATION6.1 Population P
Page 66 and 67:
GRAPH 6-1TWDB Population Projection
Page 68 and 69:
GRAPH 6-3Texas State Data Center Po
Page 70 and 71:
TABLE 6-2Planning Study Population
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
7.1.2 City of LockhartThe City of L
Page 76 and 77:
Neiderwald. The service area in Cal
Page 78 and 79:
purchase capacity of 6.0 MGD. The a
Page 80 and 81:
Lockhart. The plant is capable of d
Page 82 and 83:
In 1994 GBRA began operating the Ci
Page 84 and 85:
7.3.5 Sweetwater Utility, LLCSweetw
Page 86 and 87:
TABLE 8-1Caldwell County - TWDB His
Page 88 and 89:
Municipal water demand projections
Page 90 and 91:
applicable. A “P” in the Region
Page 92 and 93:
the modified TSDC Scenario 1.0, sho
Page 94 and 95:
GRAPH 8-3Caldwell County Survey Res
Page 96 and 97:
GRAPH 8-4Caldwell County Yearly Wat
Page 98 and 99:
espectively from the information pr
Page 100 and 101:
TABLE 9-6Caldwell County Projected
Page 102 and 103:
10.3 United States Environmental Pr
Page 104 and 105:
10.4.3 Source Water ProtectionSourc
Page 106 and 107:
10.6.1 E.coli PotentialIt is estima
Page 108 and 109:
TABLE 10-4Estimated Loadings from U
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
The proposed GBRA Mid-Basin Project
Page 114 and 115:
11.1.3 Lower Guadalupe Water Supply
Page 116 and 117:
the maximum available groundwater f
Page 118 and 119:
An ASR is a viable solution. Ground
Page 120 and 121:
The water conservation strategy is
Page 122 and 123:
SECTION 12REGIONAL WATER PLANNING12
Page 124 and 125:
TABLE 12-2Caldwell County Water Sup
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
12.3.2 DistributionThe water will b
Page 130 and 131:
12.4 Water System Cost EstimatesVar
Page 132 and 133:
300272GRAPH 13-1Caldwell County OSS
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2. The Martindale Regional Facility
Page 138 and 139:
decentralized system providing sewe
Page 140 and 141:
Unfortunately, the simplicity of O&
Page 142 and 143:
associated costs. Efficient and fun
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
14.3 Water Quality Concerns and Sou
Page 148 and 149:
wastewater plant return flows. The
Page 150 and 151:
14.6 Recommended Load ReductionsLoa
Page 152 and 153:
14.7.2 Water Quality Development Or
Page 154 and 155:
14.8.3 Vegetative Filter StripsVege
Page 156 and 157:
Use constructed wetlands to capture
Page 158 and 159:
14.12 Implementation Recommendation
Page 160 and 161:
Type II reclaimed water is defined
Page 162 and 163:
Pollutant loading to streams from e
Page 164 and 165:
Future growth in Caldwell County wi
Page 166 and 167:
14.12.4 OSSF Annual Inspection and
Page 168 and 169: Water Quality Monitoring Program -
Page 170 and 171: execute strategies. Local, state, a
Page 172 and 173: the environment. Funding for the pr
Page 174 and 175: the watershed organizations should
Page 176 and 177: water or groundwater to meet future
Page 178 and 179: Mid-Basin Project and associated fa
Page 180: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 191 and 192: APPENDIX B
Page 193 and 194: APPENDIX B0 / ?% '(0 ;6 ) , 6
Page 195 and 196: APPENDIX B ) ) ) B C * (
Page 197 and 198: APPENDIX B &# ! % 44' # (0 5#
Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX B # %# '(=. )1. )@. )
Page 201 and 202: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 205 and 206: State WellNumber6702902670290567029
Page 217: State WellNumber6719606671960767196
Page 221 and 222: APPENDIX EThe tables presented in t
Page 223 and 224: APPENDIX EWaterUserGroupTABLE 7PROJ
Page 225 and 226: APPENDIX ERules of the Gonzales Cou
Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX EAVERAGE QUEEN CITY OR SPA
Page 229 and 230: Historical Water Use Summary by Cou
Page 231 and 232: Historical Water Use Summary by Gro
Page 235 and 236: UseCodePriority DatePriority Month,
Page 237 and 238: CountyName1 = Anderson 52 = Crane 1
Page 239 and 240: WRNoWRTypeWRSeqAPPENDIX GTCEQ SURFA
Page 241 and 242: APPENDIX HWATER CONSERVATION MEASUR
Page 243 and 244: APPENDIX HWater Rate StructureAn in
Page 245 and 246: APPENDIX HLeak Detection and Repair
Page 249 and 250: APPENDIX I• The cities of Kyle, L
Page 253 and 254: Management MeasureSeptic System Ins
Page 255 and 256: Outreach ActivityAgricultural Progr
Page 257 and 258: APPENDIX KWhereas the parties to th
Page 259: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 265 and 266: RESPONSE TO WRITTEN COMMENT BY JOHN
Page 267 and 268: APPENDIX MCaldwell County Regional
Page 269 and 270:
APPENDIX MCaldwell County Regional
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277:
APPENDIX NTEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT B
Page 282 and 283:
APPENDIX NKlotz Associates, Inc.Res
Page 284 and 285:
APPENDIX NKlotz Associates Response
Page 286:
show all

caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?