caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

State WellNumber671211267121136712114671211567121166712117671211967122026712203671230167123026712303671230567123066712307671231267124066712407671240867124126712413Aquifer Depth Date B/U pH Silica Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Carbonate Bicarb. Sulfate Chloride Fluoride NitrateDissolvedSolidsSpec. CondumhosHardnessas CaCO3% Sodium SAR RSC124WLCX 300 6 / 7 / 1964 B 7.6 22 35 12 c 154 0 214.06 168 85 0.3 0 581 921 136 71 5.73 0.77124WLCX 213 6 / 23 / 1952 B 7.22 51 43.2 6.2 c 40.1 0 124.4 35.2 58 294 133 39 1.51 0124WLCX 201 6 / 24 / 1952 B 7.25 28 74.8 5.5 c 44.3 0 209.8 35.8 68 359 209 31 1.33 0124WLCX 552 10 / 29 / 1952 B 8.4 15 9.6 3.5 c 221.3 0 398 26.2 116 587 38 92 15.54 5.76124WLCX 240 11 / 10 / 1969 B 6.9 17 50 16 61 5 0 93.97 80 115 0.3 < 0.4 390 750 190 41 1.92 0124WLCX 200 5 / 20 / 1971 B 7.2 34 99 7 42 0 250 36 91 0.7 1 433 798 276 24 1.1 0124WLCX 302 9 / 17 / 1970 B 7.83 13 9 3 c 228 0 394.17 13 138 597 1040 34 93 16.81 5.76124WLCX 153 6 / 17 / 1946 U 0 322 120 158 1.8124WLCX 87 6 / 19 / 1946 U 0 164 50 206 0124WLCX 300 3 / 14 / 1946 B 7.5 22 96 59 134 16 0 430.12 96 229 0.6 22 886 1580 482 37 2.65 0124WLCX 126 7 / 16 / 1946 U 0 358 60 230 0124WLCX 66 6 / 20 / 1946 U 22 316 250 550 6.5124WLCX 335 6 / 20 / 1946 U 24 248 150 375124WLCX 100 8 / 2 / 1946 U 0 302 40 80 0.5124WLCX 140 8 / 2 / 1946 U 0 446 45 181 22 467124WLCX 520 3 / 22 / 1971 B 8 40 15 105 0 298.98 45 60 0.4 5 417 161 58 3.59 1.67124WLCX 520 6 / 5 / 1998 B 7.52 26.4 24.7 9.99 128 3.19 0 319.73 41.1 50.4 0.35 < 0.22 442 896 103 73 5.49 3.19124WLCX 520 3 / 25 / 2002 B 7.53 25.6 25.6 10.2 112 2.9 0 318.51 35.7 46.7 0.46 0.26 416 698 106 69 4.74 3.1124WLCX 47 4 / 16 / 1946 U 5.9 318 16 22 45124WLCX 88 5 / 3 / 1946 U 0 549 65 755 125124WLCX 113 5 / 3 / 1946 U 0 307 17 25 0.8124WLCX 300 5 / 19 / 1971 B 7.5 29 66 27 62 0 314.85 58 69 0.3 < 0.4 466 852 275 32 1.62 0112LWCX 80 5 / 19 / 1971 B 7 42 156 21 47 0 335.6 54 173 0.4 < 0.4 658 1260 475 17 0.94 0* Depth value here reflects the bottom of the SAMPLED INT ERVAL which was different from the completed well depthMonday, March 02, 2009 created by the Texas Water Development BoardPage 9 of 16
State WellNumber6712414671241567124166712417671241867124196712421671242367125016712502671250367125166712517Aquifer Depth Date B/U pH Silica Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Carbonate Bicarb. Sulfate Chloride Fluoride NitrateDissolvedSolidsSpec. CondumhosHardnessas CaCO3% Sodium SAR RSC124WLCX 120 5 / 20 / 1971 B 7 32 550 28 258 0 453.97 93 920 0.3 315 2419 4805 1487 27 2.91 0112LWCX 110 5 / 19 / 1971 B 7.3 21 93 3.2 15 0 273.36 12 14 < 0.1 17 309 544 245 11 0.42 0124WLCX 120 5 / 19 / 1971 B 7.7 25 49 19 86 0 335.6 24 63 0.1 < 0.4 431 786 200 48 2.64 1.49112LWCX 90 5 / 19 / 1971 B 7.5 23 93 2.67 8.3 0 253.83 14 13 0.2 12 290 508 242 6 0.23 0112LWCX 90 5 / 20 / 1971 B 7.3 31 118 2.4 25.1 0 378.31 9 24 0.2 < 0.4 396 720 304 15 0.63 0.11112LWCX 80 5 / 20 / 1971 B 7.2 22 151 12 64 0 305.09 56 179 0.5 2.5 637 1242 425 24 1.35 0124WLCX 99 4 / 12 / 1981 B 8.2 29 103 4 9 0 303.87 6 14 0.2 22 336 580 273 6 0.24 0124WLCX 273 5 / 20 / 1971 B 7.2 32 106 9.7 37 0 366.1 24 41 0.3 < 0.4 430 750 304 20 0.92 0124WLCX 340 3 / 25 / 1953 B 7.5 45 55 14 c 51 0 241.07 21 60 0.1 0 364 619 194 36 1.59 0.06124WLCX 340 4 / 14 / 1964 B 6.8 43 62 17 57 3.1 0 232 44 85 0.3 0 425 708 224 35 1.65 0124WLCX 340 3 / 3 / 1986 B 8 39 79 20.3 105 4 0 270.92 71 158 0.3 0.04 609 1168 280 44 2.73 0124WLCX 320 4 / 28 / 1953 B 7.97 20 56 9.6 c 60.2 0 212.06 30 74 354 179 42 1.96 0124WLCX 320 5 / 23 / 1953 B 7.4 65 60 14 c 63 0 208.06 44 89 0.4 0.2 437 701 207 39 1.9 0124WLCX 320 5 / 26 / 1961 B 7.2 53 15 61 0 203.05 53 70 0.2 < 0.4 352 650 193 40 1.91 0124WLCX 320 1 / 7 / 1963 B 7.2 58 11 55 0 210.06 43 74 0.1 < 0.4 344 702 189 38 1.74 0124WLCX 320 4 / 15 / 1964 B 6.8 48 55 14 56 4.2 0 212 43 75 0.2 0 399 654 194 37 1.75 0124WLCX 320 2 / 22 / 1966 B 7.4 59 12 56 0 207.06 40 78 0.3 < 0.4 347 700 196 38 1.74 0124WLCX 320 5 / 12 / 1967 B 7.2 60 13 59 0 212.06 40 82 0.4 < 0.4 359 720 202 38 1.8 0124WLCX 320 2 / 15 / 1968 B 7.2 58 14 58 0 212.34 40 82 0.4 < 0.4 357 730 202 38 1.77 0124WLCX 320 2 / 17 / 1969 B 7.1 61 13 56 0 211.12 42 82 0.3 < 0.4 358 704 205 37 1.7 0124WLCX 320 4 / 13 / 1970 B 7.1 59 17 56 0 209.9 53 80 0.4 < 0.4 369 720 216 35 1.65 0124WLCX 320 2 / 12 / 1971 B 7.1 63 13 54 0 211.12 43 85 0.3 < 0.4 362 725 210 35 1.62 0124WLCX 320 2 / 16 / 1972 B 7.3 62 14 59 0 209.9 44 86 0.4 < 0.4 369 735 212 37 1.76 0124WLCX 320 2 / 26 / 1973 B 7.1 63 14 58 0 211.12 47 89 0.3 < 0.4 375 750 214 37 1.72 0124WLCX 320 7 / 29 / 1977 B 7.9 50 68 13 62 0 212.34 50 91 0.3 < 0.4 439 770 222 37 1.81 0124WLCX 320 3 / 3 / 1986 B 8 44 92 18 81 4 0 242.85 64 164 < 0.1 0.04 586 1120 303 36 2.02 0124WLCX 290 2 / 15 / 1946 U 0 82 70 104124WLCX 482 * 11 / 10 / 1952 B 8 14 58.8 13.8 c 50.8 0 251.3 20.6 54 335 203 35 1.55 0.04124WLCX 482 * 11 / 13 / 1952 B 7.3 36 66 14.4 c 59 0 246.4 26 86 408 223 36 1.72 0124WLCX 482 * 11 / 14 / 1952 B 7.85 12 28 6.3 c 155 0 327.09 37 88 487 95 77 6.89 3.45124WLCX 456 4 / 22 / 1953 B 8.3 8 51 12.8 c 154.6 0 336 31.8 146 569 179 65 5.02 1.91* Depth value here reflects the bottom of the SAMPLED INT ERVAL which was different from the completed well depthMonday, March 02, 2009 created by the Texas Water Development BoardPage 10 of 16
Page 1 and 2:
CALDWELL COUNTY REGIONAL WATERAND W
Page 4 and 5:
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
flows without impacting environment
Page 18 and 19:
viable for Caldwell County are wate
Page 20 and 21:
parameters and needs. For purposes
Page 22 and 23:
SECTION 1INTRODUCTION1.1 Background
Page 24 and 25:
A Grant Application for a Regional
Page 26 and 27:
1.4 Participants and SponsorsThe Ca
Page 28 and 29:
SECTION 2CALDWELLL COUNTY CHARACTER
Page 30 and 31:
Construction for segments 5 and 6 o
Page 32 and 33:
Watershed and Peach Creek Watershed
Page 34 and 35:
2.4 Certificates of Convenience and
Page 36 and 37:
Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
Page 38 and 39:
GRAPH 2-1Lockhart, Texas Monthly Av
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
water quality in the county. Finall
Page 46 and 47:
SECTION 4GROUNDWATER4.1 Groundwater
Page 48 and 49:
efore 1953. Deterioration in water
Page 50 and 51:
loose sand. The sand tends to be fr
Page 52 and 53:
4.3 Groundwater Conservation Distri
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
support the efforts of PCCD. The di
Page 58 and 59:
SECTION 5SURFACE WATER5.1 GeneralSu
Page 60 and 61:
GRAPH 5-1Caldwell County Total Surf
Page 62 and 63:
GRAPH 5-2TWDB- Caldwell County Hist
Page 64 and 65:
SECTION 6POPULATION6.1 Population P
Page 66 and 67:
GRAPH 6-1TWDB Population Projection
Page 68 and 69:
GRAPH 6-3Texas State Data Center Po
Page 70 and 71:
TABLE 6-2Planning Study Population
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
7.1.2 City of LockhartThe City of L
Page 76 and 77:
Neiderwald. The service area in Cal
Page 78 and 79:
purchase capacity of 6.0 MGD. The a
Page 80 and 81:
Lockhart. The plant is capable of d
Page 82 and 83:
In 1994 GBRA began operating the Ci
Page 84 and 85:
7.3.5 Sweetwater Utility, LLCSweetw
Page 86 and 87:
TABLE 8-1Caldwell County - TWDB His
Page 88 and 89:
Municipal water demand projections
Page 90 and 91:
applicable. A “P” in the Region
Page 92 and 93:
the modified TSDC Scenario 1.0, sho
Page 94 and 95:
GRAPH 8-3Caldwell County Survey Res
Page 96 and 97:
GRAPH 8-4Caldwell County Yearly Wat
Page 98 and 99:
espectively from the information pr
Page 100 and 101:
TABLE 9-6Caldwell County Projected
Page 102 and 103:
10.3 United States Environmental Pr
Page 104 and 105:
10.4.3 Source Water ProtectionSourc
Page 106 and 107:
10.6.1 E.coli PotentialIt is estima
Page 108 and 109:
TABLE 10-4Estimated Loadings from U
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
The proposed GBRA Mid-Basin Project
Page 114 and 115:
11.1.3 Lower Guadalupe Water Supply
Page 116 and 117:
the maximum available groundwater f
Page 118 and 119:
An ASR is a viable solution. Ground
Page 120 and 121:
The water conservation strategy is
Page 122 and 123:
SECTION 12REGIONAL WATER PLANNING12
Page 124 and 125:
TABLE 12-2Caldwell County Water Sup
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
12.3.2 DistributionThe water will b
Page 130 and 131:
12.4 Water System Cost EstimatesVar
Page 132 and 133:
300272GRAPH 13-1Caldwell County OSS
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2. The Martindale Regional Facility
Page 138 and 139:
decentralized system providing sewe
Page 140 and 141:
Unfortunately, the simplicity of O&
Page 142 and 143:
associated costs. Efficient and fun
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
14.3 Water Quality Concerns and Sou
Page 148 and 149:
wastewater plant return flows. The
Page 150 and 151:
14.6 Recommended Load ReductionsLoa
Page 152 and 153:
14.7.2 Water Quality Development Or
Page 154 and 155:
14.8.3 Vegetative Filter StripsVege
Page 156 and 157:
Use constructed wetlands to capture
Page 158 and 159:
14.12 Implementation Recommendation
Page 160 and 161:
Type II reclaimed water is defined
Page 162 and 163: Pollutant loading to streams from e
Page 164 and 165: Future growth in Caldwell County wi
Page 166 and 167: 14.12.4 OSSF Annual Inspection and
Page 168 and 169: Water Quality Monitoring Program -
Page 170 and 171: execute strategies. Local, state, a
Page 172 and 173: the environment. Funding for the pr
Page 174 and 175: the watershed organizations should
Page 176 and 177: water or groundwater to meet future
Page 178 and 179: Mid-Basin Project and associated fa
Page 180: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 191 and 192: APPENDIX B
Page 193 and 194: APPENDIX B0 / ?% '(0 ;6 ) , 6
Page 195 and 196: APPENDIX B ) ) ) B C * (
Page 197 and 198: APPENDIX B &# ! % 44' # (0 5#
Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX B # %# '(=. )1. )@. )
Page 201 and 202: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 205 and 206: State WellNumber6702902670290567029
Page 211: State WellNumber6711701671170267117
Page 221 and 222: APPENDIX EThe tables presented in t
Page 223 and 224: APPENDIX EWaterUserGroupTABLE 7PROJ
Page 225 and 226: APPENDIX ERules of the Gonzales Cou
Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX EAVERAGE QUEEN CITY OR SPA
Page 229 and 230: Historical Water Use Summary by Cou
Page 231 and 232: Historical Water Use Summary by Gro
Page 235 and 236: UseCodePriority DatePriority Month,
Page 237 and 238: CountyName1 = Anderson 52 = Crane 1
Page 239 and 240: WRNoWRTypeWRSeqAPPENDIX GTCEQ SURFA
Page 241 and 242: APPENDIX HWATER CONSERVATION MEASUR
Page 243 and 244: APPENDIX HWater Rate StructureAn in
Page 245 and 246: APPENDIX HLeak Detection and Repair
Page 249 and 250: APPENDIX I• The cities of Kyle, L
Page 253 and 254: Management MeasureSeptic System Ins
Page 255 and 256: Outreach ActivityAgricultural Progr
Page 257 and 258: APPENDIX KWhereas the parties to th
Page 259: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 265 and 266:
RESPONSE TO WRITTEN COMMENT BY JOHN
Page 267 and 268:
APPENDIX MCaldwell County Regional
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277:
APPENDIX NTEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT B
Page 282 and 283:
APPENDIX NKlotz Associates, Inc.Res
Page 284 and 285:
APPENDIX NKlotz Associates Response
Page 286:
show all

caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?