caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Texas Water Development BoardGround<strong>water</strong> Database ReportsWater Quality Publication ReportCaldwellCounty:State WellNumber5860703586070458607055860706586070758607096702503670250767026016702602670260367027026702703670270467027056702706670270767027086702801Aquifer Depth Date B/U pH Silica Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Carbonate Bicarb. Sulfate Chloride Fluoride Nitrate124WLCX 49 2 / 27 / 1946 U 0 65.9 28 41 62DissolvedSolidsSpec. CondumhosHardnessas CaCO3% Sodium SAR RSC124WLCX 18 2 / 27 / 1946 B 7.2 35 46 6.7 36 4.6 0 152.54 20 51 0.2 9.8 284 470 142 35 1.29 0124WLCX 44 6 / 11 / 1946 U 0 84 13 102 41124WLCX 26 6 / 11 / 1946 U 0 328 16 84 2.2124WLCX 150 1 / 9 / 1964 B 7.6 16 24 7.8 c 150 0 334.09 37 74 0.6 0 473 795 92 78 6.77 3.64124WLCX 180 7 / 19 / 1977 B 7.6 29 50.6 9.97 103 0 219.66 44 115 0.3 2.4 462 846 167 57 3.45 0.25110AVML 29 6 / 13 / 1946 U 0 270 16 16 30110AVML 21 6 / 12 / 1946 U 7.9 230 20 16 41110AVML 19 6 / 12 / 1946 U 12 202 32 26 34110AVML 21 6 / 12 / 1946 U 9.8 144 13 28 60110AVML 35 6 / 13 / 1946 U 11 231 25 27 55100ALVM 27 2 / 26 / 1968 B 7.3 19 98 7 30 0 339.26 20 22 0.3 7 370 680 273 19 0.79 0.09100ALVM 31 2 / 26 / 1968 B 7.2 20 130.2 8.5 57.3 0 345.36 58 55 0.4 72 571 1038 359 25 1.3 0110AVML 31 3 / 28 / 1946 U 0 294 65 71 59110AVML 22 3 / 28 / 1946 U 0 286 34 64 47110AVML 25 3 / 28 / 1946 U 0 356 65 141 176100ALVM 26 2 / 26 / 1968 B 7.3 18 106.4 7.66 27.8 0 356.34 27 18 0.5 13 393 716 297 16 0.71 0100ALVM 29 2 / 28 / 1968 B 7.1 18 201 21 180 0 339.26 211 334 0.5 16.5 1148 2272 587 39 3.23 0* Depth value here reflects the bottom of the SAMPLED INT ERVAL which was different from the completed well depthMonday, March 02, 2009 created by the Texas Water Development BoardPage 1 of 16
State WellNumber67029026702905670290867033016703303670330467034016703402670360167036026703603670370367037046703705670370667037076703708670370967037116703712Aquifer Depth Date B/U pH Silica Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Carbonate Bicarb. Sulfate Chloride Fluoride NitrateDissolvedSolidsSpec. CondumhosHardnessas CaCO3% Sodium SAR RSC100ALVM 22 2 / 14 / 1946 B 122 5.1 c 38 0 268.07 40 81 40 457 891 325 20 0.92 0112LEON 25 3 / 28 / 1946 U 0 264 110 358 58112LEON 24 3 / 29 / 1946 U 0 248 65 239 38112LEON 20 7 / 18 / 1976 B 7.2 17 133.6 5.5 44.4 0 405.15 35 57 0.4 5.8 497 924 356 21 1.02 0124WLCX 20 6 / 11 / 1946 U 0 340 1150 1240124WLCX 20 7 / 19 / 1977 B 7.8 24 514 215 660 0 817.63 1788 808 1.5 1.3 4413 8344 2167 39 6.17 0124WLCX 67 6 / 11 / 1946 U 0 298 24 54 0124WLCX 72 2 / 27 / 1946 U 0 336 85 560 1.5110AVML 14 6 / 12 / 1946 U 0 308 65 32 25110AVML 30 6 / 12 / 1946 U 0 284 54 70 33124WLCX 49 4 / 12 / 1946 U 0 412 80 94 0.5124WLCX 35 6 / 11 / 1946 U 0 340 765 148124WLCX 26 6 / 11 / 1946 U 0 338 430 800112LEON 29 1 / 24 / 1946 U 0 326 46 22 26218EDRDA 3367 2 / 20 / 1964 B 6.9 17 894 433 c 2480 0 547.15 2130 4770 10993 15800 4012 57 17.03 0112LEON 23 1 / 25 / 1946 U 0 278 45 27112LEON 23 7 / 14 / 1943 U 195112LEON 23 8 / 23 / 1943 U 209112LEON 23 1 / 25 / 1946 U 0 274 60 42 16112LEON 23 1 / 24 / 1946 U 0 272 26 20 20112LEON 16 1 / 24 / 1946 U 0 253 35 26112LEON 17 1 / 24 / 1946 U 0 282 26 38 39112LEON 31 1 / 24 / 1946 U 0 316 45 37 26112LEON 22 1 / 24 / 1946 U 0 298 45 30* Depth value here reflects the bottom of the SAMPLED INT ERVAL which was different from the completed well depthMonday, March 02, 2009 created by the Texas Water Development BoardPage 2 of 16
Page 1 and 2:
CALDWELL COUNTY REGIONAL WATERAND W
Page 4 and 5:
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
flows without impacting environment
Page 18 and 19:
viable for Caldwell County are wate
Page 20 and 21:
parameters and needs. For purposes
Page 22 and 23:
SECTION 1INTRODUCTION1.1 Background
Page 24 and 25:
A Grant Application for a Regional
Page 26 and 27:
1.4 Participants and SponsorsThe Ca
Page 28 and 29:
SECTION 2CALDWELLL COUNTY CHARACTER
Page 30 and 31:
Construction for segments 5 and 6 o
Page 32 and 33:
Watershed and Peach Creek Watershed
Page 34 and 35:
2.4 Certificates of Convenience and
Page 36 and 37:
Klotz Associates Project No. 0972.0
Page 38 and 39:
GRAPH 2-1Lockhart, Texas Monthly Av
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
water quality in the county. Finall
Page 46 and 47:
SECTION 4GROUNDWATER4.1 Groundwater
Page 48 and 49:
efore 1953. Deterioration in water
Page 50 and 51:
loose sand. The sand tends to be fr
Page 52 and 53:
4.3 Groundwater Conservation Distri
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
support the efforts of PCCD. The di
Page 58 and 59:
SECTION 5SURFACE WATER5.1 GeneralSu
Page 60 and 61:
GRAPH 5-1Caldwell County Total Surf
Page 62 and 63:
GRAPH 5-2TWDB- Caldwell County Hist
Page 64 and 65:
SECTION 6POPULATION6.1 Population P
Page 66 and 67:
GRAPH 6-1TWDB Population Projection
Page 68 and 69:
GRAPH 6-3Texas State Data Center Po
Page 70 and 71:
TABLE 6-2Planning Study Population
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
7.1.2 City of LockhartThe City of L
Page 76 and 77:
Neiderwald. The service area in Cal
Page 78 and 79:
purchase capacity of 6.0 MGD. The a
Page 80 and 81:
Lockhart. The plant is capable of d
Page 82 and 83:
In 1994 GBRA began operating the Ci
Page 84 and 85:
7.3.5 Sweetwater Utility, LLCSweetw
Page 86 and 87:
TABLE 8-1Caldwell County - TWDB His
Page 88 and 89:
Municipal water demand projections
Page 90 and 91:
applicable. A “P” in the Region
Page 92 and 93:
the modified TSDC Scenario 1.0, sho
Page 94 and 95:
GRAPH 8-3Caldwell County Survey Res
Page 96 and 97:
GRAPH 8-4Caldwell County Yearly Wat
Page 98 and 99:
espectively from the information pr
Page 100 and 101:
TABLE 9-6Caldwell County Projected
Page 102 and 103:
10.3 United States Environmental Pr
Page 104 and 105:
10.4.3 Source Water ProtectionSourc
Page 106 and 107:
10.6.1 E.coli PotentialIt is estima
Page 108 and 109:
TABLE 10-4Estimated Loadings from U
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
The proposed GBRA Mid-Basin Project
Page 114 and 115:
11.1.3 Lower Guadalupe Water Supply
Page 116 and 117:
the maximum available groundwater f
Page 118 and 119:
An ASR is a viable solution. Ground
Page 120 and 121:
The water conservation strategy is
Page 122 and 123:
SECTION 12REGIONAL WATER PLANNING12
Page 124 and 125:
TABLE 12-2Caldwell County Water Sup
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
12.3.2 DistributionThe water will b
Page 130 and 131:
12.4 Water System Cost EstimatesVar
Page 132 and 133:
300272GRAPH 13-1Caldwell County OSS
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2. The Martindale Regional Facility
Page 138 and 139:
decentralized system providing sewe
Page 140 and 141:
Unfortunately, the simplicity of O&
Page 142 and 143:
associated costs. Efficient and fun
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
14.3 Water Quality Concerns and Sou
Page 148 and 149:
wastewater plant return flows. The
Page 150 and 151:
14.6 Recommended Load ReductionsLoa
Page 152 and 153:
14.7.2 Water Quality Development Or
Page 154 and 155: 14.8.3 Vegetative Filter StripsVege
Page 156 and 157: Use constructed wetlands to capture
Page 158 and 159: 14.12 Implementation Recommendation
Page 160 and 161: Type II reclaimed water is defined
Page 162 and 163: Pollutant loading to streams from e
Page 164 and 165: Future growth in Caldwell County wi
Page 166 and 167: 14.12.4 OSSF Annual Inspection and
Page 168 and 169: Water Quality Monitoring Program -
Page 170 and 171: execute strategies. Local, state, a
Page 172 and 173: the environment. Funding for the pr
Page 174 and 175: the watershed organizations should
Page 176 and 177: water or groundwater to meet future
Page 178 and 179: Mid-Basin Project and associated fa
Page 180: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 191 and 192: APPENDIX B
Page 193 and 194: APPENDIX B0 / ?% '(0 ;6 ) , 6
Page 195 and 196: APPENDIX B ) ) ) B C * (
Page 197 and 198: APPENDIX B &# ! % 44' # (0 5#
Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX B # %# '(=. )1. )@. )
Page 201 and 202: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 203: C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
Page 207 and 208: State WellNumber6703804670380567038
Page 221 and 222: APPENDIX EThe tables presented in t
Page 223 and 224: APPENDIX EWaterUserGroupTABLE 7PROJ
Page 225 and 226: APPENDIX ERules of the Gonzales Cou
Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX EAVERAGE QUEEN CITY OR SPA
Page 229 and 230: Historical Water Use Summary by Cou
Page 231 and 232: Historical Water Use Summary by Gro
Page 235 and 236: UseCodePriority DatePriority Month,
Page 237 and 238: CountyName1 = Anderson 52 = Crane 1
Page 239 and 240: WRNoWRTypeWRSeqAPPENDIX GTCEQ SURFA
Page 241 and 242: APPENDIX HWATER CONSERVATION MEASUR
Page 243 and 244: APPENDIX HWater Rate StructureAn in
Page 245 and 246: APPENDIX HLeak Detection and Repair
Page 249 and 250: APPENDIX I• The cities of Kyle, L
Page 253 and 254: Management MeasureSeptic System Ins
Page 255 and 256:
Outreach ActivityAgricultural Progr
Page 257 and 258:
APPENDIX KWhereas the parties to th
Page 259:
Page 265 and 266:
RESPONSE TO WRITTEN COMMENT BY JOHN
Page 267 and 268:
APPENDIX MCaldwell County Regional
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277:
APPENDIX NTEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT B
Page 282 and 283:
APPENDIX NKlotz Associates, Inc.Res
Page 284 and 285:
APPENDIX NKlotz Associates Response
Page 286:
show all

caldwell county regional water and wastewater planning study

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?