Berkeley Bibliography - Home Pages

Berkeley Bibliography(1979-2013)Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimientode Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 35-44.Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of a Lost Letter.” HarvardTheological Review 70 (1977): 175-76.Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493-504._____. “Absolute Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and Berkeley.”Metascience 19 (2010): 385-89._____. “On the Ghosts of Departed Quantities.” Metascience 21 (2012): 681-83._____. “Hutcheson, Perception, and the Sceptic's Challenge.” British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy 20 (2012): 269-81.Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John Locke und George Berkeley.München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008.Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process after George Berkeley:Passive for Active Subject?” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981): 43-57.Addyman, David and Feldman, Matthew. “Samuel Beckett, Wilhelm Windelband, and the Interwar"Philosophy Notes".” Modernism/Modernity 18 (2011): 755-70.Agassi, Joseph. “The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in Philosophy 7(1975), 167-78.Aichele, Alexander. “Ich Denke Was, Was Du Nicht Denkst, Und Das Ist Rot. John Locke UndGeorge Berkeley Über Abstrakte Ideen Und Kants Logischer Abstraktionismus I thinksomething that you do not think, and that is red. John Locke and George Berkeley overabstract ideas and Kant's logical abstractionism.” Kant-Studien 103 (2012): 25-46.Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8(1985), 9._____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48(1987), 235-56._____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224-43._____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s Siris.” In Daniel, NewInterpretations (2007), 261-81._____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 87-106._____. “Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.” Revue Philosophique de la France etde l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70._____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley’s Siris.” History of European Ideas 37 (2011):23-34.1

(2007), 37-52._____. “A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley’s Philosophy 1707-1709.” Revue Philosophique dela France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 71-82._____. “Berkeley’s Way towards Constructivism, 1707-1709.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),3-14._____. “On George Berkeley’s Alleged Letter to Browne: A Study in Unsound Rhetoric.” BerkeleyStudies 22 (2011): 3-8.Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc (1711).” Hermathena 146(1989): 7-23.Benítez, Laura. “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 23-34.Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into English.” Teaching Philosophy17 (1994): 261-69._____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Benschop, Hans Peter. Berkeley on Method and Metaphysics. Ph. D. diss., University of Leiden,1992._____. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997):55-66.Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 14-15.Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s Notion of Suggestion.” Conceptus 23 (1989): 21-30.Berchielli, Laura. “Conoscenza analogica e teoria del significato nell’Alcifrone. Novità etradizione.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 383-92.Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.” Revue philosophique (1982): 45-57._____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de Berkeley.” Revuephilosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 331-38._____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000)._____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats philosophiques. Paris: PUF,2003._____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” in Charles (2004), 145-61._____, and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.” In Ong-Van-Cung (2006),163-77.Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 9._____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An Account of the Life ofBerkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977): 15-28._____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 8-9._____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room 16-17 (1978): 26-28._____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 12-13._____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 14._____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.” Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie5

_____. “‘One is All, and All is One.’ The Great Chain of Being in Berkeley’s Siris.” In O’Gormanand Donald (2005), 63-82._____. “George Berkeley’s ‘Universal Language of Nature’.” In Klaas van Berkel and Vanderjagt(2005), 71-84._____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006._____. “Rhetoric of Faith and Patterns of Persuasion in Berkeley’s ‘Alciphron’.” Heythrop Journal47 (2006): 544-61.______. The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Re-enchantment. New York: FordhamUniversity Press, 2006._____. “George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.” Tr. Jaimir Conte. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia16 (2009): 257-84.Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.” History of PhilosophyQuarterly 5 (1988): 11-22.Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-dimensional OpticalPicture.” Ratio 17 (1975): 176-90.Braund, Michael J. From inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in theoptical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson. St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University,Dept. of Philosophy, 2008.Bravo, Hamdi. “The Problem of Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke and Berkeley” [inTurkish]. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences] 5(2008): 59-80.Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Boston: Merrymount, 1946 (republished 2007).Breidert, Wolfgang. “Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 13._____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980._____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.” Revue internationale dephilosophie 154 (1985): 223-41._____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Fridericana Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36(1985): 3-13._____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.” Berkeley Newsletter 8(1985): 7-8._____. “With the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter8 (1985): 11-12._____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14._____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986): 185-91._____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.” In Sosa (1987), 231-41._____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens ..verteidigt und erklär. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987._____. “Review: Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster and Howard Robinson.” Archiv fürGeschichte der Philosophie 69 (1987): 315-21._____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 373-85.9

_____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989._____. “Berkeley, George.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260._____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine Philosoph. Translated by Luiseund Friedrich Raab; edited by Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996._____. “Berkeley’s Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58._____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.” In Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts,edited by Kreimendahl and Lothar. Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86._____. “Berkeley’s Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the Infinite in Mathematics.” InKoetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508._____. “Berkeley Poeticized.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 214-29._____. “Die Ambivalenz von Vorurteilen bei Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 287-95.Breuninger, Scott Christopher. Morals, the Market, and History: George Berkeley and Social Virtuein Early Eighteenth-Century Thought. Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002.________. “Rationality and Revolution: Rereading Berkeley’s Sermons on Passive Obedience.”New Hibernia Review 12 (2008): 63-86._______. Recovering Bishop Berkeley : Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context. New York :Palgrave Macmillan, 2010._____. “Planting an Asylum for Religion: Berkeley’s Bermuda Scheme and the Transmission ofVirtue in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World.” Journal of Religious History 34 (2010):414-29.Brolley, Kevin G. “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23.Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.” International Studies in Philosophy 27(1995): 15-31._____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.” British Journal for theHistory of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69._____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” Dialogue 44 (2005): 493-504._____. “Is Geometry about Tangible Extension?” Berkeley Studies 20 (2009): 5-12._____. “Non-Conscious Agency and Berkeley’s Theory of Signs.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage(2011), 287-99.Brown, Michael. “The Biter Bitten: Ireland and the Rude Enlightenment.” Eighteenth - CenturyStudies 45 (2012): 393-407.Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 13-14._____. “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley.” in CambridgePlatonists in Philosophical Context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher,1997, 197-214.Brueckner, Anthony. “Idealism and Scepticism.” Theoria 77 (2011): 368-71.Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le Dictionaire de Bayle.”Revue internationale de philosophie 29 (1975): 496-514._____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le XVII ème Siècle 2 (1978): 173-10

92._____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.” Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (1979): 553-69._____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 3(1979): 9-10._____. “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notionsabstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15._____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Recherches sur le XVII ème siècle 4(1980): 157-66._____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVII ème Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69._____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.” Revue philosophique (1980): 421-32._____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 12-16._____. “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique (1983): 427-41._____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. 2 vols. Lille: Atelier National de reproduction desthèses. Paris: Vrin, 1984._____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12-13._____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 127-37._____. “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.” Revue internationalede philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51._____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” History of EuropeanIdeas 7 (1986): 585-91._____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse 109 (1988): 148-50._____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms.” Les Etudes philosophiques 3-4 (1989): 445-54._____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique etde morale (1991): 515-29._____. “Review: George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with an introduction byMariapaola Fimiani.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 17._____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993._____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti (1995), 121-37._____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique 2. Nanterre: Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1997._____., ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique. Le Tempsphilosophique 6. Nanterre: Département de Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999._____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse-Quilliot (2000), 15-35._____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley.” InBerlioz (2003), 17-46._____. “On Human Liberty in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),231-46._____. “Berkeley, Spinoza and Radical Enlightenment.” In Parigi (2010b), 159-70.11

_____. “Courte vue et vision synoptique chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et del’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 83-95._____. “La liberté humaine dans le Dialogue VII de l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz(2010), 331-40._____. “La sémantique dans le Dialogue VII.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 407-12._____. “Short-Sightedness and Long-Sightedness in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),195-206.Bruce, Michael and Barbone, Steven. “Berkeley's Master Argument for Idealism.” Just theArguments (2011): 68-69.Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.”Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50.Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.” Contrafuerte (1985): 28-34.Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, Scientific Realism and Creation.” Religious Studies 20 (1984): 453-64.Caffentzis, C. George, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum zu einem irischenKlassiker der politischen Ökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999._____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money. Dordrecht:Kluwer, 2000._____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Locke andBerkeley.” History of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement): 204-33._____. “Algebraic Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and Money.” Berkeley Studies18 (2007): 3-23._____. “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money. An Apology and Synopsis.” InParigi (2010b), 57-71._____. “Did Hume Read Berkeley’s The Querist?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 157-74.Calazans, Alex. “Considerações a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em O Analista.”Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 391-418.Campagnola, Francesco. “George Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia divina.” Nouvelles-de-la-Republique-des-lettres 2 (2006): 25-76.Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982): 471-73.Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.”Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 429-48._____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3._____. “Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.” Isis 75 (1984): 668-83.Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a Phenomenalism: Leibniz, Berkeley and the Science of Happiness.”Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007): 57-78.______. The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed. London, New York: Continuum, 2009.Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” Notes and Recordsof the Royal Society of London 42 (1988): 35-52.Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86.12

Çetin, Ismail. “The ‘Language Metaphor’ and Its Implications in George Berkeley’s Philosophy.”Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 14 (2010):123-30.Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance. London: Franck Cass,1998.Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of Berkeley’s Dialogues.”Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 14-18._____. “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: Panacea or Imposture?” Hermathena 168 (2000):55-69._____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialoguebetween Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.” Hume Studies 27 (2001): 85-97._____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica13 (2001): 27-42._____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis etBerkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59._____. Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J.Vrin, 2003._____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la volonté chez Malebranche etBerkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88._____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley. Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Pressesl’Université Laval, 2004._____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and Reconstruction.” In Daniel, NewInterpretations (2007), 283-309.______. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive (1712) aux Maximes sur lepatriotisme (1750)” The European Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24._____. “Berkeley et Campailla: recontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Criticodella Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39.______. “The Animal According to Berkeley.” In Parigi (2010b), 189-99.______. “Berkeley et l’imagination.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135(2010), 97-108.______. “La réception de l’Alciphron en France au siècle des Lumières.” In Jaffro, Brykman,Schwartz (2010), 371-79._____. “Berkeley et Campailla: rencontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Criticodella Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39._____. “Foi, croyance et raison selon Berkeley.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 135-47.Cicekdagi, Caner. “Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley’s Book Three Dialogues between Hylas andPhilonous.” Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal ofPhilosophy] 10 (2008): 115-26.Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “Berkeley: Uma física sem causas eficientes.” Cadernos de Historia eFilosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 357-90._____. “Berkeley e o papel das hipóteses na filosofia natural Berkeley and the role of hypothesis innatural philosophy.” Scientiae Studia 8 (2010): 389-419.13

Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley.” Philosophy East and West 44(1994): 55-77.Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley.” Filosofia 49(1998): 53-75.Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and PoliticalThought. New York: Garland, 1989._____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404.Clarke, Desmond M. George Berkeley: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress (2008).Clarke, Desmond M. and Wilson, Catherine, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in EarlyModern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Clasen, Uwe. Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der Geschichteder physiologischen Optik. Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997.Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.” Philosophy 53 (1978): 102-105.Conley, Patrick T. Rhode Island’s Founders: from Settlement to Statehood. Charleston, SC: HistoryPress, 2010.Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some Comments on Irish AugustanPolitics.” Albion 3 (1971): 82.Conte, Jaimir. “A Oposição de Berkeley ao Ceticismo.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia daCiencia 18 (2008): 325-55.Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and Siris as PhilosophicalMonologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18 (1988): 167-86.Coutinho, Maurício C. “Os Escritos Econômicos de Berkeley.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia daCiencia 18 (2008): 293-324.Cover, J. A. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990.Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley.”Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997): 101-17.Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?” Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81-92.Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments. London; New York: Routledge,1991, 3 vols.Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York: Garland, 1988.Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other Minds.” Auslegung 6 (1978): 45-50.Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory ofRepresentation in Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview PublishingCompany, 1992._____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” Nous 9 (1975): 55-72._____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989): 15-32._____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5._____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229._____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),14

121-52.Curtis, Benjamin L. “A New Look at Berkeley’s Idealism.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009), 189-94.Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?” Modern Theology 18 (2002): 361-73.Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987._____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1998._____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2003.Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.” AmericanCatholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 621-36._____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy 9 (2001): 487-505._____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.” Idealistic Studies 31 (2001): 55-72._____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49(2001): 179-94._____. “Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the Historyof Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58._____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 163-70._____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),203-30.______ “The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz and the English SpeakingWorld, ed. Stuart Brown and Pauline Phemister. New York: Springer/Kluwer (2007), 163-80.______, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy BooksSeries. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2007.______, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007._____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Treatment of Representation.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25(2008): 41-55.______. “How Berkeley’s Works Are Interpreted.” In Parigi (2010b), 3-14.______. “Berkeley and Spinoza.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),123-34._____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Divine Analogy.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 149-61._____. “Stoicism in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 121-34._____. “Berkeley's 'Alciphron': English Text and Essays in Interpretation.” British Journal for theHistory of Philosophy 19 (2011): 563-66._____. Review of Berkeley’s Alciphron: English Text and Essays in Interpretation, eds. LaurentJaffro, Geneviève Brykman, and Claire Schwartz. British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy 19 (2011): 563-66.Daniel, Stephen H. and Charles, Sébastien. “Montréal Conference Summaries.” Berkeley Studies 23(2012): 54-57.15

Darren, Hynes. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22(2005): 339-56.Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In Winkler (2005), 311-38.Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408.De Almeida Marques, José Oscar. “Berkeley e o Problema de Barrow.” Cadernos de Historia eFilosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 419-45.Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995._____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999._____. “Le principe de la morale.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),45-56.De Waal, Cornelis. “The Real Issue Between Nominalism and Realism: Peirce and BerkeleyReconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33.______. “Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism.” Journalof the History of Ideas 67 (2006): 291-313.Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Dialogues BetweenHylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22._____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201-13._____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.” Philosophical Quarterly56 (2006): 517-35.______. “Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 335-50._____. Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.” Annali della Facolta diLettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63.Doney, Willis. “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?” In Turbayne (1982), 273-82._____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983):295-308._____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York: Garland, 1989.Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Reason Why Berkeley Is So Often Misunderstood?”Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap 26 (1985-6).Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In Muehlmann (1995), 197-216._____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy 3 (1995): 279-300._____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In Winkler (2005), 230-65._____. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle.” In Mercer andO’Neill (2005), 206-30.Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena167 (1999): 35-58.Drunga, Mykolas. “Berkeley and the Time-Gap Argument.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 55-75.16

D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: Aristotle and Berkeley. PhilosophicalContribution to a Theological Question.” Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32.Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985.Dunlop, Katherine. “The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality.”Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 83 (2011): 525-59.Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford:Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992.Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.” Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56.Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind. Atascadero: Eastview, 1997.Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise of the Christian Doctrine ofCreation.” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987): 431-47.Eberwein, Robert. “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of Being’.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58.Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “‘Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la filosofia de GeorgeBerkeley.” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002): 179-208; republished inEstudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48.Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65 (1998): 604-23.Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and Dialectical Tension.”Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29.El-Bizri, Nader. “A Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen’s Optics.” Arabic Sciences andPhilosophy 15 (2005): 189-218.Emundts, Dina. “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity.” In Kant and the EarlyModerns ed. Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse. Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress, 2008, 117-41.Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.” Proceedings of theAmerican Philosophical Society 119 (1975): 87-107.Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based Epistemology of TrueContradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008):35-58.Esenyel, Adnan. “Idealism and Kant’s Conception of Space” (in Turkish). Kaygi: UludagUniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi (Uludag University Journal of Philosophy) 17 (2011): 149-62.Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985):79-93.Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.” Faith and Philosophy 14(1997): 353-77.Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of Physical Space.” Journalof the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): 63-84.Faris, J. A. “Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays edited by C. M. Turbayne.”Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 26-32.Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre Bedeutung für die Philosophiedes Immaterialismus und ihre historischen Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993.Fedriga, Riccardo. “Oggetti e aspetti intenzionali nella teoria dell’astrazione di George Berkeley.”17

Dianoia: Annali di Storia della Filosofia 15 (2010): 147-66.Feuer, Lewis F. “Materialism, Idealism and Science.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 71-75.Fields, Keota. Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence. Lanham: Lexington Books,2011.Fimiani, Mariapaola. George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine. Cosenza: Lerici, 1979.Fincham, R. M. “Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of theHistory of Philosophy 49 (2011): 221- 41.Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985):407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments, edited by Walter E. Creery,London and New York: Routledge (1991), 404-24._____.“Berkeley on Abstraction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 483-501;reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas, edited by Willis Doney, in ThePhilosophy of George Berkeley Series, New York: Garland (1988)._____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his Theory of Meaning. London:Croom Helm, 1987._____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 235-53._____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and Gracia (1994), 133-54._____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism, edited by Don Garrett and EdwardBarbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press (1997), 44-55._____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31._____. "Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10." Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543-51._____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34(2004): 25-60._____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006).http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/b/berkeley.htm._____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13._____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In Daniel (2008), 45-75._____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 3-18._____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 361-72._____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 379-80._____. “Analysis in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 35-53.Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 300-325._________. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34(2004): 25-60.__________.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In Daniel, NewInterpretations (2007): 47-75.Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.” Journal of the History ofPhilosophy 44 (2006): 415-29.Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman (1993), 214-26.18

Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.” Philosophical Review97 (1988): 47-69._____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13(1996): 331-44._____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge,2001.Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.” Revue philosophique de la France etde l’étranger 4 (1997): 429-46.Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Fourny-Etchegaray, Claire. “Note sur les rapports entre raison et sens commun chez Stillingfleet etBerkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 357-60.________. “Les diverses conceptions du sens commun et de son role dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro,Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 393-405.Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of Identity in Early EighteenthCentury England.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 16 (1982): 1-25.Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.” Critica 26 (1994): 73-95.Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of the Principles.” SouthernJournal of Philosophy 15 (1977): 37-51.Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley,Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 381-402._____. “Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos’ Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009),409-413._____. “Berkeley and God in the Quad.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2012): 388-96._____. Review of Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence by Keota Fields.Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 46-50.Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy Research Archives 13(1987/88): 481-87.Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley.” Journal of theHistory of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96.Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.” Yearbook of the IrishPhilosophical Society 2005: 92-117.Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 3._____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120 (1976): 63-73._____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 4(1980): 4-13.Ganson, Todd; and Ganson, Dorit. “Everyday Thinking about Bodily Sensations.” AustralasianJournal of Philosophy 88 (2010), 523-34.Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth CenturyPhilosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.19

________, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton UniversityPress (2008).Garcia Varas, Ana. “Ideas e imagenes: un estudio de la teoria de las ideas abstractas en Hume.”Revista de Filosofia 66 (2010): 93-106.Garrett, Aaron. Berkeley's Three dialogues : a reader's guide. London ; New York : Continuum(2008).Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, GeorgeBerkeley. Napoli: Vivarium, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000._____, and Pugliese Carratelli, G. “Per una storia intellettuale dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: IlCatalogue della biblioteca di Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei.Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14 (2003): 224-39.Gaukroger, Stephen. “Picturability and Mathematical Ideals of Knowledge.” In Clarke and Wilson,338-60._____, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.” Church History 48 (1979):5-17._____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979._____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (1995): 479-82.Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition. NotreDame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.Ghosh, Kuntal and Bhaumik, Kamales. “Complexity in human perception of brightness: a historicalreview on the evolution of the philosophy of visual perception.” OnLine Journal ofBiological Sciences 10 (2010): 17-35.Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and the New EnglandPortrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987): 122-45.Glasson, Travis. “‘Baptism doth not bestow Freedom’: Missionary Anglicanism, Slavery, and theYorke-Talbot Opinion, 1701-30.” William & Mary Quarterly 67 (2010): 279-318.Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.” Studia Philosophica 42 (1983):165-200._____. “Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps.” In Brykman (1997), 91-116._____. Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme. Sprimont: Mardaga,1999._____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz(2003), 103-34._____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley.” In Daniel, ReexaminingBerkeley (2007), 50-81._____. “Optique géométrique, images rétiniennes et corpuscules chez Berkeley.” RevuePhilosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 7-18.Glenney, Brian. “Adam Smith and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of ScottishPhilosophy 9 (2011): 205-23.20

Glezakos, Stavroula. “Comments on Melissa Frankel’s ‘Something-We-Know-Not-What,Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds’.” Philosophia 37 (2009),403-407.Glombíček, Petr; and Hill, James. George Berkeley: průvodce jeho filosofií. Praha: Filosofia, 2009.Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological Background of Berkeleianism.”Idealistic Studies (1982): 14-34._____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982):244-65._____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem PhilosophicalQuarterly 40 (1991): 315-18._____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1994):145-63.Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975): 245-54.Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia 17 (1994): 225-52.Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.” International Journalof Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423.Grandi, Giovanni Battista. “Comments on Daniel E. Flage’s ‘Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.’”Philosophia 37 (2009), 373-78.Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.” Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27.Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34.Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London: Duckworth, 1986._____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005), 166-89.Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?” Philosophy andPhenomenological Research 55 (1995): 279-96.Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.” Monist 61 (1978): 415-34.Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85.Grush, Rick. “Berkeley and the Spatiality of Vision.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45(2007): 413-42.Grzeliński, Adam. “The Berkeleyan Conception of Nature.” Вісник Національного авіаційногоуніверситету. Філософія. Культурологія" Збірник наукових праць. Київ 2 #12 (2010):13-20._____. Człowiek i duch nieskończony. Immaterializm George’a Berkeleya [The Man and the InfiniteSpirit: The Immaterialism of George Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus CopernicusUniversity Press, 2010.Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique de la France et del’étranger (1986): 309-17.Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko. “La conception berkeleyana del yo.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-22.Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common Critique of the Moral SenseTheory,” in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings, ed. Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: IndianaUniversity Press, 1996, 100-121.21

Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 4-8.Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.”In Berlioz (2003), 47-78._____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie instrumentale.” In Charles(2004), 103-26._____. “L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 60 (2007): 25-45.Hanson, Norwood Russell. “The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29 (1962):27-38.Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to Enlightenment.” NeueZeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990): 319-37.Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” History of Philosophy Quarterly21 (2004): 101-17.Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas Tech. University (1981), 81-85.Harman, Graham. “Realism without Materialism.” Substance: A Review of Theory & LiteraryCriticism 40 (2011): 52-72.Harris, James. “Berkeley on the Inward Evidence of Freedom.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz(2010), 341-50.Harris, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.” History of PhilosophyQuarterly 14 (1997): 99-120.Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002.Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal Reality.” InMuehlmann (1995), 47-66._____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 39-46._____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence Model.” History ofPhilosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38.Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.Häyry, Matti. “Passive Obedience and Berkeley’s Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Studies 23 (2012):3-14.Häyry, Matti and Häyry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s Theological Utilitarianism.”Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42.Hendrix, John; Williams, Roger; Carman, Charles H. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Aldershot:Ashgate, 2010.Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy8 (1977): 147-63.Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92.Hibbs, Darren. “John Scottus Eriugena on the Composition of Material Bodies.” British Journal forthe History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 385-93.Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What We Feel.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002):148-62._____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine Ideas.” Philosophia 33 (2005): 97-128.22

_____. “Berkeley's Half-Way House.” Philosophy Compass 1(2006): 28-35._____. “Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 443-58._____. “Why My Chair is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single Idea Thesis.” InDaniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107._____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park: PennState University Press, 2008._____. “New Berkeley Correspondence: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 16-21._____. “Berkeley’s Metaphysical Instrumentalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 15-29._____. “How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul.” Revue Philosophique de la France et del’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 109-22._____. “Berkeley on the Difference between Brutes and Men.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),207-22._____. “Preserving the Torments of Hell: Berkeleian Immaterialism and the Afterlife.” Science etEsprit 63 (2011): 179-92._____ and Bohannon, Joshua. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation.” ModernTheology 26 (2010): 120-48._____. and Ott, Walter. “The New Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-24._____, ed. The Correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge: University Press, 2013.Hill, James. “The Synthesis of Empiricism and Innatism in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions.”Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 3-15.Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan Idealism.” British Journalfor the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 653–83._____. “Berkeley’s Missing Argument: The Sceptical Attack on Intentionality.” British Journal forthe History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 47-77.Hochschild, Joshua P. “George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The Downside Review 122(2004): 157-68.Hoffmann, Yoel. “ ‘Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and Vasubandhu.” Philosophy East-Philosophy West (1978): 247-68.Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final Satire on Deism.” DurhamUniversity Journal (1982): 19-27.Hollingshead, G. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.” Scottish Literary Journal 11(1984): 20-35._____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four Books.” English Studies inCanada 10 (1984): 141-55._____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth-Century Life 9 (1985): 51-64._____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 1-9.Holtzman, Matthew. “Berkeley on Common Sense, Theology, and Matter.” Ph.D. dissertation:Johns Hopkins University, 2010._____. “Berkeley's Two Panaceas.” Intellectual History Review 21 (2011): 473-95.23

_____. Review of Berkeley et la chimie: Une philosophie pour la chimie au XVIII e siècle by LucPeterschmitt. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 40-45.Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy. London: Faber & Faber,1931.Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15.Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3(1979): 16.Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992): 1-19.Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 1-2.Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley.” AnalisisFilosofico 6 (1986): 13-22.Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical Studies 14 (1995): 1-17.Ilodigwe, Damian. Berkeley: A Portrait. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 501-10._____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82.Isermann, Michael M. “George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition ofLinguistic Platonism. Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and LinguisticPlatonism.” Language & Communication 28 (2008): 57.Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth and Berkeley.” InGaukroger (1991).Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” Philosophia 37 (2009):415-29._____. “Remarks on Smalligan Marušić’s Comments.”Philosophia 37 (2009), 437-39.Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the Existence of God.” Journal of Religion65 (1985): 1-14._____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.” Religious Studies 29 (1993):453-63._____. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley by John R.Roberts. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2011): 468-72.Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence perçue’.” In Ressemblances etdissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre,Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91._____. “La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception thérapeutique de laphilosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G.Brykman, Université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73._____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie 67 (2004): 85-111._____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in Alciphron III.” In Daniel,Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 199-213._____. “L’évidence de l’existence d’autrui est-elle un modèle pour la connaissance de Dieu?Berkeley, Hume, Reid, et l' ‘argument irrégulier.’” HAL – CCSD (2010)._____. “Ėducation moderne et tradition antique selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz24

(2010), 277-86._____. “Ist die Evidenz der Existenz des Anderen ein Modell für die Gotteserkenntnis? Berkeley,Hume, Reid und das ‘Argument des Irregulären’.” Aufklärung: Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuchzur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte 21 (2009): 51-74.Jaffro, Laurent; Brykman, Geneviève; Schwartz, Claire, eds. Berkeley’s Alciphron. English Textand Essays in Interpretation. Hildesheim: Olms, 2010._____. “ ‘Reid said the business, but Berkeley did it.’ Ferrier interprète de l’immatérialisme.” RevuePhilosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 135-49.Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the Non-CognitivistInterpretation. Ph. D. diss., University of Tartu. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002._____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” British Journal forthe History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 401-11._____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of the Christian Religion (inAlciphron)”, The Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 23-34._____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions inScripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90._____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 53-68._____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28._____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism.” In Daniel, ReexaminingBerkeley (2007): 188-98._____. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron VI.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz(2010), 353-56.Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst. A Modern Edition withIntroductions and Commentary. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992._____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993._____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 183-206._____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005), 266-310._____. “Faith and Fluxions: Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In Daniel, NewInterpretations (2007), 247-60.Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Journal of TheologicalStudies 9 (1958): 197-98.Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.” In Cover (1990), 227-44._____. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34(1996): 535-48.Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009.Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy. Houndmills, Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005._____. “George Berkeley and Thomas Secker: A Note.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006), 14-19._____. Review of ‘We Irish’ in Europe: Yeats, Berkeley & Joseph Hone by W. J. Mc Cormack.Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 51-53.Kabitoglou, E, Douka. “On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth Century England.”25

Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45.Kail, P. J. E. “Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism: Berkeley and Hume.” In Parigi(2010b), 31-40._____. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Proceedings ofthe Aristotelian Society 107 (2009): 265-78.Kamio, Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the Consciousness.” Journalof the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35.Karásek, Jindrich. “Mind and the Other [in Czech].” Filosoficky Casopis 57 (2009), 61-69.Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88.Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for Social Epistemology. 90 Yearsafter Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74.Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” The NewScholasticism 49 (1975): 480-94.Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.Keefe, Jenny. “The Return to Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2007),101-13.Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist [Abstract].”Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14._____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist.”Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16._____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25._____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 13-14._____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68.Kennedy, Máire. “Reading the Enlightenment.in Eighteenth-Century Ireland.” Eighteenth-CenturyStudies 45 (2012): 355-78.Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book Collector (1981): 177-81.Kijaczko, Stanislaw. Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofiiGeorge’a Berkeleya. Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002.Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish Philosopher.Lewiston: Mellen, 1992.Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of Nature in Modern Times. Leuven:Peeters Publishers, 2005.Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 16 (1986): 57-68.Klemme, Heiner F. “Causality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed.Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 368-88._____. “Substances and Modes, Space and Time.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed, Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006,vol. 1, 343-67.Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19(1987): 21-31.26

_____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99.Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A Historical Study.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.” Harvard Theological Review66 (1973): 219-36.Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The Existential Significance of Depthfor Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and Desmond.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society2005: 237-53.Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das philosophische Denken.Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004.Kroustallis, Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21(2004): 151-66.Ksenjek, Ekaterina Y. and Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley, the Author of Nature, and the Judeo-Christian God.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 281-300.Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987._____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys. Basel: Schwabe, 2001.Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.” Revue internationale dephilosophie 28 (1974): 511-31.Kuznetsova, Irina. “Utpaladeva’s Conception of Self in the Context of the Ᾱtmavāda -AnātmavadaDebate and in Comparison with Western Theological Idealism. Philosophy East & West 62(2012): 339-58.Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.” Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21._____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982): 165-70.Lamers, Robert. “Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981): 120-43.Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.” Journal of the History ofIdeas 38 (1977): 635-49.Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11 (1988): 33-48.Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le ‘langage optique’.” Revuephilosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 409-27.Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.” Idealistic Studies 20 (1990): 19-41.Lee, Sukjae. “Berkeley on the Activity of Spirits.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(2012): 539-76.Le Jallé, Ėléonore. “Mandeville dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 297-308.Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of Morality and Society inEarly Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society ofFinland, 2007.Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988): 231-50._____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue 40 (2001): 651-67._____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science38 (2007): 36-55.27

_____. “The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated” History of European Ideas 33(2007), 321-29.____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy 16 (2008): 101-24._____. “The Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley’s Theory: Idealism and Perceptual Heterogeneity.”Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 91-115.Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993): 29-37.Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1997.Levin, Janet. “Molyneux Meets Euthyphro: Does Cross-Modal Transfer Require RationalTransition?” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2008): 289-97.Levin, Yakir. “Idealism and Relativism: Locke, Berkeley, Kant, and Wittgenstein” [in Hebrew].Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2010): 128-42.Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric Mentalism: Pantheism?” Sophia (1987): 30-41._____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive Idealism?” Idealistic Studies 22(1992): 163-78.Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.”Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36._____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in Society.” Hume Studies19 (1993): 223-26.Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de theologie et de philosophie(1980): 241-52.Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992): 399-416.Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.” Berkeley Newsletter 14(1995/96): 1-4.Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999._____. Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999.Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978): 5-28.Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et Berkeley.” Revue demétaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68.Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 2008.Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13 (1991): 89-107.Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123 (1977): 19-25.Luce, J. V. “Yale College and the Acquisition of Whitehall.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 19-22.Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den korrecten Realismus.”Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996): 305-40.Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.” Berkeley Newsletter 12(1991/92): 11-15.Mahon, James Edwin. “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy by Peter Walmsley.”28

Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 15-17.Maia Neto, José R. “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.” Journal of the History ofIdeas 58 (1997): 199-220.Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl critique de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et del’étranger (1986): 355-66.Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon Berkeley.” History ofEuropean Ideas 7 (1986): 623-32.Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Freiburg, Breisgau:Alber, 1984.Mancino, Michele. “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George Berkeley.” InAtti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in Campania. Napoli, Quadernidell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004, 271-304.Mandal, Nathaniel. Idee und Intention. Die Ideen- beziehungsweise Bedeutungstheorie John Lockesund ihre Wiederbelebung in der Theorie der Sprecherbedeutung bei Paul Grice. Munich:Grin Verlag, 2010._____. Qualitäten der Wahrnehmung. Lockes Unterscheidung zwischen Qualitäten primärer undsekundärer Art und Berkeleys Immaterialismuseinwand. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010.Marciano, Bruno. George Berkeley. Estetica e idealismo. Genova: Nova Scripta, 2010.Martinello, Francesco. “Direzioni del moto e direzioni nello spazio: Berkeley e Kant.” Rivista diFilosofia 102 (2011): 105-23.Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in Aesthetics and the Heritage of George Berkeley.”(in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11 (1974): 30-52.Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien 74 (1983): 161-75.McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archiv für Geschichte derPhilosophie 61 (1979): 280-92._____. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983._____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16._____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 597-602._____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24(1986): 19-40._____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through Malebranche and Locke toDescartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611._____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200._____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” In Muehlmann (1995), 249-60._____. “Demons that Deceive, Gods that Perceive, and the Limits of Skepticism.” In Brykman(1997), 73-89._____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48._____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler. Oxford:Blackwell, 2002, 437-55._____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 23-44._____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials.29

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000._____. “Leibniz and Berkeley on Body.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 175-92.McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.” Journal of theHistory of Philosophy 46 (2008): 567-90.McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting of New England.”Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982): 181-98.McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1-4._____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.” Studies in Eighteenth-CenturyCulture 12 (1983): 105-13._____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102.McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Scottish Journal ofTheology 15 (1962): 420-23.McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in Berkeley.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas (1982): 665-71._____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985):156-61._____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Journal of the Historyof Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69._____. “Review of Theodore Young: Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. ModernPhilosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 13-16._____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88):637-53._____. “Review of Ernest Sosa, Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley.” BerkeleyNewsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32._____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 215-33._____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98):1-13._____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93.McKinnon, Rhys. “Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments of Hume andBerkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas.” Sorites: An International ElectronicMagazine of Analytical Philosophy. 16 (2005), 38-45.McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90.Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19 (1982): 3-21.Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel Dzhonson kak kritikBerkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44.Menichelli, Caterina. “Was Berkeley A Spinozist? A Historiographical Answer (1718-1751).” InParigi (2010b), 171-88.Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance of the GöttingenReview.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2006): 297-317.30

Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter andMetaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Migely, Geneviève. “Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),153-71.Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Physics.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13._____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18.Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 1988.Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun 40 (1991): 95-99._____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian Philosophy’ in the Siris.”History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49.Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de CostaRica 23 (1985): 49-69.Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories ‘providentialistes’ de la vision. Chirurgiens et philosophes entreBerkeley et Molyneux.” in Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sichändernden Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N.Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76._____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il codice berkeleiano della percezione. Problemi medici e teoriefilosofiche.” In L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited by Guido Canziani andYves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993, 387-406._____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva nell’età moderna. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 1995._____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions de Descartes et les solutionsde Berkeley.” In Brykman (1997), 117-48.de Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Attributions of Authorship in the Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36:A Supplement to the Union List.” A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews21 (2008): 11-24.Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of Berkeley.” Yearbookof the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 213-36.Moore, Sean D. “Introduction: Ireland and the Enlightenment.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45(2012): 345-54.Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.” Kantstudien 79 (1988): 286-92.Morgan, Vance. “Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.”Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37.Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes and Berkeley.” SouthernJournal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92.Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973,73-88.Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism.” CanadianJournal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111._____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of31

Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425._____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992._____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania State Press, 1995._____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995), 149-70._____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995), 89-106._____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Daniel, NewInterpretations (2007), 121-44.Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley. Roma: ed. dell’Ateneo, 1979.Mun Seong-Hwa. Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen Dingkonstitution und zurdialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription. Ph. D. diss., University of Düsseldorf, 1997.Munoa Roiz, J. L. “George Berkeley (1685-1753) (II).” Archivos de la Sociedad Española deOftalmología 82 (2007): 121-22.Murray, Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs: a Replyto Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-56.Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction.” CanadianJournal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61._____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State UniversityPress, 1993._____. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.Nanavati, Shaun. “A history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.” The New SchoolPsychology Bulletin 6.Neri, Luigi. “’Filling the World with a Mite’: un paradosso dell’infinita divisibilità negli scrittigiovanili di George Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 71 (1980): 67-97._____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985):239-67._____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la ‘seconda filosofia’ di George Berkeley vescovo di Cloyne.”Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1990): 320-41._____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici. Bologna: CLUEB, 1991._____. “Fenomenismo e realismo in George Berkeley.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 3(2005): 470-94.Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach?” American Journal of Physics 76 (2008): 189-190.Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].” Filozofia 47 (1992): 310-12.Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophy Research Archives (1980).Nols, Carmen. Zeichenhafte Wirklichkeit : Realität als Ausdruck der kommunikativen PräsenzGottes in der Theologie George Berkeleys. Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Nomura, Tomokiyo. “Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context.”Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 455-57.Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism and George Berkeley’s32

Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly 42 (2001): 199-211.Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys betekenisleer.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86).Nurock, Vanessa. “La conscience morale selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010),319-30.Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.” Modern Schoolman 54(1977): 261-69.Oakes, Jason Benjamin. In Him We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Philosophical Theology inNicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Oklahoma,2009.Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion9 (1978): 16-29.O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form ofExistence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23(1996): 77-93.Oertel, Hans Joachim. George Berkeley und die englische Literatur. Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D.1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934 (Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973).O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century. PalgraveMacmillan, 2005.O’Grady, Paul. “Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst: a Modern Edition withIntroductions and Commentary. Edited by Douglas M. Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13(1993/94): 4-8.O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or Anthropomorphism?”Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 88-112.Olscamp, Paul. Some Suggestions about the Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley: Alkifron. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2008.Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles.Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006.Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68.Ott, Walter. “The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on Abstraction.” Pacific PhilosophicalQuarterly 85 (2004): 407-24._____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction.” British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy 14 (2006): 437-50._____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress (2009).Pabst, Manfred. Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und Interpretationen. Wiesbaden:Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997.Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.” American Philosophical Quarterly (1980): 181-94._____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9 (1983): 571-86._____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62.33

_____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter8 (1985): 16._____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2(1987): 105-14._____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42._____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann (1995), 127-48._____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International Studies in Philosophy 29(1997): 126-27._____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1999): 133-49._____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2000._____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In Charles (2004), 37-58._____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley(2007), 29-49._____. “Certainty and Knowledge of Objects in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 275-86.Parigi, Silvia. “George Berkeley e l’illusione lunare.” Rivista di storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51-60._____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69.______. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi, neonati e di alcuni animali.”BioLogica 4 (1990): 171-207._____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as Before’: appunti per una storiadella storiografia berkeleiana.” Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria 9 (1991):113-34._____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.” Rivista di storia della scienza 1(1993): 155-72._____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’. Firenze: Olschki, 1995._____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET, 1996._____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?” In Brykman (1997), 23-48._____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia naturale di George Berkeley.” InSegni e percorsi della modernità, edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo:Università degli studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105._____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux.” Laboratorio dell’ISPF 1 (2004):www.ispf.cnr.it/ispf-lab._____. “Review: Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.” Philosophy inReview 27 (2007): 407-409._____. Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. La fisica curiosa dal Rinascimento al Secolo dei Lumi. Napoli:Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2010a._____, ed. George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht:Springer, 2010.______. “Scire per causas Versus scire per signa: George Berkeley and Scientific Explanation inSiris.” In Parigi (2010b), 107-19.34

______. “Lo spirito etereo e l’acqua di catrame.” In Parigi (2010a), 248-51.______. “Siris and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.” Revue Philosophiquede la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 151-62.Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s Theory of Concepts. TheHague: Nijhoff, 1972._____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.” Giornale di Metafisica 12 (1981):243-65._____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981): 231-41._____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical Commentaries.” In The Worksof George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Nendeln,Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982._____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies 1 (1983): 103-9._____. “Facts and Reasons Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 7(1984): 14-16._____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.” Giornale di Metafisica 19(1988): 17-41.Patey, Douglas. “Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas 47 (1986): 139-47.Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley.” Religious Studies 44 (2008):249-68.Perler, Dominik; and Haag, Johannes. Ideen. Reprasentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin,New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2010.Pessin, Andrew. Uncommon Sense: the Strangest Ideas from the Smartest Philosophers. Lanham:Rowman and Littlefield, 2012.Peters, Joseph Etienne. Language and Vision in the Writings of Jonathan Swift and GeorgeBerkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: Leeds, 2010.Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion(asterion.revues.org) 1 (2003): 112-26._____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques.” Archives internationales d´histoire dessciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97._____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., UniversitéLille 3, 2005._____. “Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy ofScience.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 19-31._____. “Berkeley and Chemistry in the Siris. The Rebuilding of a Non-Existent Theory.” In Parigi(2010b), 73-85._____. “Un impensé des principes de la connaissance humaine: la physique mathématique.” RevuePhilosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 19-29.______. “L’aspect formel du langage de la physique dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman,Schwartz (2010), 413-22._____. “Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision: Science or Metaphysics?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage(2011), 15-33.35

_____. “Quelle preuve de l’existence de quel Dieu? À propos de la ‘demonstration de l’existence deDieu’ dans Alciphron IV.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 193-204.Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van de argumentatie voorBerkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief (1985-86).Phillips, Mariléne. “Berkeley sur la volonté: Quelques ‘notes philosophiques’.” Revueinternationale de philosophie 39 (1985): 252-58._____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et del’étranger (1986): 373-76._____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 609-16.Piper, William Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 12(1978/79): 174-89.Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977._____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986):99-105._____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York: Garland, 1988._____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Garland, 1988-1989, 15 vols.Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a Pan-American Dialogue.Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.Porter, Noah. Two-hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley [1885]. Reprint. Whitefish, MT:Kessinger, 2010.Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. London: Penguin, 1990.Printz, Amanda Lewis. The Scope and Significance of George Berkeley's Language Model. Ph. D.Dissertation: University of Southern California, 2007.Pritchard, Timothy. “Meaning, Signification, and Suggestion: Berkeley on General Words.” Historyof Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 301-317.Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?” Etudes philosophiques 1 (1979): 19-38.Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley.” Journal ofthe History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86.Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753). Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995._____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Servicio dePublicaciones Contribuidor Rábade Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002).Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études irlandaises 11 (1986): 57-76.Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash,eds. Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford:Blackwell, 2007.Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics,1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New York University, 2002.Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51 (1976): 356-77.Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought12 (1990): 38-60.36

_____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money.” History ofPolitical Economy 34 (2002): 818-19._____. “Berkeley’s Querist and Its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12(1990): 38-60.Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.” Dialogue 19 (1980): 196-200._____. “Review of Pierre Dubois, L’Oeuvre de Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 19-21._____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20._____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the ScottishEnlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 231-50._____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles (2004), 89-102.Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire una struttura linguistica: il pensiero di George Berkeleyquale presupposto filosofico.” Epistemologia 12 (1989): 125-52.Reininger, Robert. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922.Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1973.Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA.: HarvardUniversity Press, 1983.Richmond, Alasdair. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide. London:Continuum, 2009._____. “New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy18 (2010): 724-26.Rickless, Samuel C. “Review of John Roberts, A Metaphysics for the Mob.” Philosophical Review118 (2009): 244-47._____. “The Relation between Anti-abstractionism and Idealism in Berkeley’s Metaphysics.”British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 723-40._____. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Corby: Oxford University Press, 2013._____. Review of Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination by Georges Dicker. Berkeley Studies23 (2012): 15-39.Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. “Plaisir sensible et beauté morale dans le troisième dialogue de l’Alciphron:Berkeley face à la naissance de l’esthétique.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 205-22.Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der Sackgasse. Bielefeld:Merlin, 1983.Roberts, John R. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York:Oxford University Press, 2007._____. “‘Strange Impotence of Men’: Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and Immanent Causation.”British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010), 411-31.Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986):617-22._____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996), 694-708._____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1996._____. “Review: Berkeley’s Thought.” Mind 113 (2004): 571-75.37

_____. “Two Berkeleian Arguments about the Nature of Space.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),79-90.Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.” Diánoia 26 (1980): 151-77._____. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981): 166-85._____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?” Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71._____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia10:2 (1984): 141-50._____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de Berkeley.” Diánoia 30(1984): 67-87._____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y traduccion.” Contrafuerte(1985): 4-11._____. “Berkeley y los minima.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 1-12._____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45-53._____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16._____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.” Dialogues 24 (1989): 81-102._____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54._____. The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990._____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de México, 1990._____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.” In Popkin (1996)._____. “Filosofia natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista Patagonicade Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56._____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004),11-22._____. “Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 30 (2004):7-35.Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos. “Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no De motu de Berkeley.”Scientiae Studia 4 (2006): 101-14.Rogers, Karen. “Two Mistakes About Berkeley.” Philosophy (1980): 552-53.Ronchi, Vasco. Commento alla Nuova teoria della visione di George Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini &Chiappi, 1973. Estratto da: Atti della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29 (1974).Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in Finnegans Wake. S. L.:Bellefonte Editeur, 1981.Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34.Ross, Ian Campbell and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs ofSignor Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201.Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian Philosophy 3 (1993): 15-28.Ryann, Todd. “A New Account of Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.” British Journal for the Historyof Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80.38

Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of Matter: Materialism andIdealism in Colonial America.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996):248-72.Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993):325-39.Santos, Antônio Carlos dos. “Berkeley face à Mandeville: de Fable des abeilles à la Lettre à Dion.”Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 163-77.Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.” Indian PhilosophicalQuarterly 10 (1983): 7-12.Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge : eine Untersuchung des Begriffs der Idee in derPhilosophie George Berkeleys. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006.Sari, Mehmet Ali. “Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley on Primary and Secondary Qualities” (inTurkish). Yeditepe'de Felsefe 10 (2011): 150-89.Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del entendimiento.” RevistaLatinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982): 247-54.Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007.Scallett, Jeffrey. “A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17 (1974): 1-6.Schabas, Margaret. “Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments.” Studies in History and Philosophy ofScience 39 (2008), 161-69.Schliesser, Eric. “On the Origin of Modern Naturalism: The Significance of Berkeley's Response toa Newtonian Indispensability Argument.” Philosophica (Belgium) 76 (2005), 45-66._____. “Wijsbegeerte tussen wetenschap en moraal in een post-newtoniaanse wereld: Berkeley,Hume, en Adam Smith.” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 100 (2008):244-46.Schmaltz, Tad. “From Causes to Laws.” In Clarke and Wilson, 32-50.Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An Overview of the ScholarlyLiterature on the Theories of George Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58(2004): 279-97._____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George Berkeley's Theory of VisualPerception in the Context of New Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58(2004): 505-26._____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108-20._____.“Action in perception? Empirical and philosophical arguments against the enactive approachto perception.” Perception 37 (2008): 433-45.Schwarte, L. and Saporiti, K. Vom Gebrauch der Vorstellung. Ideen bei George Berkeley.München: Fink, 2011.Schwartz, Claire. “Berkeley and His Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism.”In Parigi (2010b), 43-56._____. “Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.” Revue Philosophique de la France et del’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 31-44._____. “Berkeley et la norme mathématique: de l’Alciphron à l’Analyste.” In Jaffro, Brykman,39

Schwartz (2010), 423-33.Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994._____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann (1995), 217-30._____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Seth Bordner, S. “Berkeley's ‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49(2011): 315-38.Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?” Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science 18 (1987): 455-80._____. “Don’t Take Half the Way: On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.” Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993): 207-25.Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Journal ofthe History of Ideas 37 (1976): 343-49._____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New theory of vision.” New Scholasticism 51 (1977):142-61._____. “A Reply to Professor Mirarchi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15.Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting the Stone.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48.Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport Experience.” Rhode Island History 37 (1978): 53-63.Smalligan Marušić, Jennifer. “Comments on Michael Jacovides’ ‘How Berkeley Corrupted HisCapacity to Conceive’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 431-36.Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2008.Sosa, Ernest. “Russell, Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41._____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16-18._____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.Souza, José Carlos de. “Deus na Filosofia Empírica.” Caminhando 13 (2008): 105-20.Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der Philosophie: Kant, Hume undBerkeley. Hildesheim: Olms, 2006.Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Faith andPhilosophy 13 (1996): 216-35._____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 17(1998): 335-46.Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il liguaggio: considerazioni sull’applicabilità del modello linguisticoall’esperienza. Milano: Guerini, 1992._____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria della visione. Milano: Guerini, 1995.Spryszak, Przemysław. “Berkeley on the Nature of Mind” (in Polish). Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 39(2011): 25-41.Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976): 281-89._____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. New York: Lang, 1991.Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant.40

Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999.Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik. Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978.Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11.Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619-25._____. “Review of Houghton, Berman, Lapan, Images of Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986):17-18.Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.” Contrafuerte (1985): 12-18.Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Kentucky: The University Press, 1982._____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17.Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33 (1978): 153-55.Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.”Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99.Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83):5-9._____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 19._____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 25-46._____. “Add MS. 39305 [Review].” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 6-11._____. “Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, edited by Geneviève Brykman.” Berkeley Newsletter10 (1987/88): 10-13._____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 10-19._____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.” Locke Newsletter 28 (1997):105-16.Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: OxfordUniveristy Press, 2002._____. “Review: Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Mind 112 (2003): 126-30._____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In CentralWorks of Philosophy: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. John Shand. Montreal:McGinn-Queen’s University Press, 2005._____. “Catching Berkeley’s Shadow.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 116-36.Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on Charles Johnson.” AfricanAmerican Review 30 (1996): 539-48.Storrie, Stefan. “Anne Berkeley’s Contrast: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 9-14._____. “Berkeley’s Apparent Cartesianism in De Motu.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94(2012): 353–366._____. “What is it the Unbodied Spirit cannot do? Berkeley and Barrow on the Nature ofGeometrical Construction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 249-68.Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles: a Reply to George S.41

Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44.Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy 55 (1980): 149-66._____. Philosophers Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011.Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8(1977): 119-30.Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Southern Journal ofPhilosophy 28 (1990): 221-49.Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63._____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical Quarterly 55 (2005): 462-74.Szalek, Piotr. “O genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji ‘istnienia’ [“On the Genesis of the BerkeleianDefinition of ‘Existence’ (in Polish)].” In Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVIIwieku [Faces of the XVIIth-Century Philosophy]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL [CatholicUniversity Press], 2008, 93-113._____. “On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’.” Studies in Logic, Grammar,and Rethoric 15 (2009): 145-59.Szymańska, Marta. “George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Polish Studies.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008),32-40._____. Review of Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context byScott Breuninger. Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 15-19.Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed epistemologia nella polemicacon i freethinkers.” Pensiero politico 14 (1981): 243-61.Taranto, Pascal. Du déisme à l’athéisme: la libre-pensée d’Anthony Collins. Paris: Editions HonoréChampion, 2000._____. “Le personnage de Diagoras.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 361-70._____. “Alciphron ou la théorie du complot.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 223-36.Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 97-115.Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity.” Journal of theHistory of Ideas 43 (1982): 73-90.Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung in der visuellenRaumwahrnehmung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg, 2001.Thomas, Andrew. “God, Vision and Power.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal of Theology 62(2008): 80-97.Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14(1976): 163-68._____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries; Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.”Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College, 1976.Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977):243-60.Tipton, Ian. “ ‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84.42

_____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102._____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30.Tomeček, Marek. “Essays on the Concept of Mind in Early-Modern Philosophy.” Reflexe 40(2011): 120-122._____. Review of Essays on the Concept of Mind in Early-Modern Philosophy, eds. PetrGlombíček and James Hill. Reflexe 40 (2011): 120-22.Tomida, Yasuhiko. “Ideas Without Causality: One More Locke in Berkeley.” Locke Studies 11(2011): 139-54._____. Locke, Berkeley, Kant: From a Naturalistic Point of View. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2012._____. “The Lockean Materialist Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Locke Studies 10 (2010):179-97.Tommy, C. A. “A Berkeleian Model of Memory.” Journal of Indian Council of PhilosophicalResearch 22 (2005), 93-121.Tooley, Michael. “The Skeptical Challenges of Hume and Berkeley: Can They Be Answered?”Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 85 (2011): 27-46.Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15.Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light fromDescartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 591-96.Triepke, Sandra. Berkeleys Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien überdie Menschliche Erkenntnis.” Norderstedt Germany: Grin (2009).Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6 (1983):125-36.Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle.” Isis 50 (1959): 467-72._____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,1982._____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69._____. Metaphors for the Mind: The Creative Mind and its Origin. Columbia: University of SouthCarolina Press, 1991.Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a Reply to Kenneth P.Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51.Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson, 2000.Urmson, J. O. Berkeley.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982._____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562-66._____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84.Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on infinitesimals.” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5.Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London: Open University Press, 1982.Vernon, David. “Review of Robert Schwartz, Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.”43

Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94) : 9-14.Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la vision.” Revuephilosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1997): 45-58._____.“La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997), 149-63.Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée de la Théorie de la visionde Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102._____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004).Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la abstraccion como simple semantica.”Revista de Filosofia (Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60.Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley on Whether We CanDream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81.Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” PhilosophischeRundschau 49 (2002): 271-72.Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s Relation to Kant. New York:Garland, 1989.Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist onUnderdevelopment?” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959): 31-40._____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 68 (1960): 307-10.Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982._____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 555-62.Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3.Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 2005._____.“Kant’s Debt to the British Empiricists.” In Bird (2006), 93-107.Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought.Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1965.Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of Arguments fromThomas Reid.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982): 355-68.Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537-46._____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 33-40._____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981):1-5._____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim.” Journal of the History ofIdeas 43 (1982): 673-80.Wheeler, Kathleen M. “Berkeley’s Ironic Method in the Three Dialogues.” Philosophy andLiterature 4 (1980), 18-32.Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung dargestellt an Berkeley,44

Kant und Wittgenstein. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2006.Williamson, Timothy. “Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, edited by JohnFoster and Howard Robinson.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7.Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction”,British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301._____, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII.” British Journal forthe History of Philosophy 17 (2009):99 – 118.Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 183-96.Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton (1997).Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in Self and Nature inKant’s Philosophy, ed. A. W. Wood. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1984,157-73._____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987):249-64._____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987), 3-22._____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, N. J.: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1999._____. Kant and “The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,2008.Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of HumanKnowledge. Hackett, 1982._____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 1-6._____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency [Abstract].” BerkeleyNewsletter 8 (1985): 20._____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.” Hermathena 139 (1985):81-100._____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80._____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 17(1986): 23-42._____. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989._____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005._____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.” In Winkler (2005), 125-65._____. “Marvellous Emptiness: Berkeley on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness.” In Airaksinenand Belfrage (2011), 223-50._____. “Continuous Creation.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011): 287-309.Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des logischen Positivismus.Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998.Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” British Journal for the Philosophy ofScience 4 (1953): 22-25.Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.” Berkeley Newsletter 345

(1979): 5-8.Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 293-307._____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.” Journal of the History ofPhilosophy 14 (1976): 427-34.Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.” Journal of theHistory of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65._____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984._____. Thinking Matter. Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984._____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, 1990._____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy.” In Idea, ed.Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1990, 237-54.Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy. Lanham,Md.: University Press of America, 1985.Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de l’induction?” In Charles (2004), 23-36.Zukowski, Bartosz. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Existence: A Linguistic Approach” (inPolish). Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 30 (2011): 93-108.46