10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

David Strauss, <strong>the</strong> confessor and <strong>the</strong> writertacle to behold Strauss as a metaphysical architect build<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> clouds. But for whom is this spectacle mounted? For <strong>the</strong> nobleand contented 'we', so as to preserve <strong>the</strong>ir contentment: perhaps<strong>the</strong>y were overcome by fear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> those merciless wheels <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> universal mach<strong>in</strong>e and trembl<strong>in</strong>gly begged <strong>the</strong>ir leader for help.Whereupon Strauss started <strong>the</strong> 'sooth<strong>in</strong>g oil' flow<strong>in</strong>g, led on a Godwho errs out <strong>of</strong> a passion for error, and assumed for once <strong>the</strong> whollyuncongenial role <strong>of</strong> a metaphysical architect. He does all thisbecause his 'we' are afraid and he himself is afraid - and here we discover<strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> his courage, even with respect to his 'we'. For hedoes not dare to tell <strong>the</strong>m honestly: I have liberated you from ahelpful and merciful God, <strong>the</strong> universe is only a rigid mach<strong>in</strong>e,take care you are not mangled <strong>in</strong> its wheels! This he dares not do:so he has to call <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sorceress, that is to say metaphysics. To <strong>the</strong>philist<strong>in</strong>e, however, even a Straussian metaphysic is preferable to<strong>the</strong> Christian, and <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> an err<strong>in</strong>g God more attractive thanthat <strong>of</strong> a miracle-work<strong>in</strong>g one. For he himself, <strong>the</strong> philist<strong>in</strong>e, commitserrors, but has never yet performed a miracle.It is for this very reason that <strong>the</strong> philist<strong>in</strong>e hates <strong>the</strong> genius: for <strong>the</strong>genius has <strong>the</strong> justified reputation <strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g miracles; and thatis why it is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest degree <strong>in</strong>structive to see why, <strong>in</strong> one solitarypassage, Strauss for once presents himself as <strong>the</strong> dar<strong>in</strong>g defender <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> genius and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aristocratic natures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit. Why does hedo it? From fear, this time fear <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social democrats. He refers<strong>the</strong>m to Bismarck, Moltke, 'whose greatness can be <strong>the</strong> less denied as<strong>the</strong>y advance <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> palpable action. Now even <strong>the</strong> moststiff-necked and surly <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fellows must be constra<strong>in</strong>ed to lookupwards a little, so as to get a sight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se exalted figures, even ifonly to <strong>the</strong> knee.' Do you perhaps desire, Master, to give <strong>the</strong> socialdemocrats <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> how to get kicked? The will to deliver suchkicks is to be found everywhere, after all, and that those who are toget kicked can see only 'to <strong>the</strong> knee' <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se exalted figures seems toensure that <strong>the</strong> kicks will be successfully delivered. 'In <strong>the</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>art and science too', Strauss goes on, '<strong>the</strong>re will never be a lack <strong>of</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gs who build and who give work to a host <strong>of</strong> carters.' Good - butsuppose <strong>the</strong> carters <strong>the</strong>mselves start to build? It does happen,metaphysical Master, you know that - <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gs will have to gr<strong>in</strong>and bear it.This union <strong>of</strong> audacity and weakness, <strong>of</strong> rash words and cowardlyacquiescence, this subtle assessment <strong>of</strong> how and with what expressionsone can now impress <strong>the</strong> philist<strong>in</strong>e, now flatter him, this33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!