10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

David Strauss; <strong>the</strong> confessor and <strong>the</strong> writer<strong>the</strong>ologian. Then, 'this unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> writer and <strong>the</strong> man, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> headand <strong>the</strong> heart'. The latter quality dist<strong>in</strong>guishes every great writer, andsometimes even <strong>the</strong> little writer, for a narrow m<strong>in</strong>d gets onfabulously well with a narrow heart. And <strong>the</strong> former quality, universality,is <strong>in</strong> itself no dist<strong>in</strong>ction at all, especially as <strong>in</strong> Less<strong>in</strong>g's case itwas a mere necessity. What is, ra<strong>the</strong>r, to be marvelled at <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>seLess<strong>in</strong>g enthusiasts is precisely that <strong>the</strong>y fail to notice this consum<strong>in</strong>gnecessity which pursued Less<strong>in</strong>g throughout his life and forcedupon him his 'universality'; that <strong>the</strong>y fail to realize that such a man isconsumed too quickly, like a flame, and are not <strong>in</strong>dignant that thistender, ardent be<strong>in</strong>g was darkened, tormented and suffocated by <strong>the</strong>vulgar narrowness and poverty <strong>of</strong> his whole environment, andespecially that <strong>of</strong> his learned contemporaries; that <strong>the</strong>y fail tounderstand, <strong>in</strong>deed, that this admired universality is someth<strong>in</strong>g thatought to evoke, not admiration, but a pr<strong>of</strong>ound feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> pity.'Commiserate with <strong>the</strong> extraord<strong>in</strong>ary man', Goe<strong>the</strong> cries to us, 'tha<strong>the</strong> lived <strong>in</strong> so miserable' an age he had constantly to exert himselfpolemically.'* How, my dear philist<strong>in</strong>es, can you th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> Less<strong>in</strong>gwithout a feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> shame: he who perished <strong>of</strong> your stupidity, <strong>in</strong>conflict with your ludicrous totems and idols, through <strong>the</strong> wretchedstate <strong>of</strong> your <strong>the</strong>atres, your scholars, your <strong>the</strong>ologians, without evenonce be<strong>in</strong>g able to venture that eternal flight for which he had come<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> world. And what do you feel when you rememberW<strong>in</strong>ckelmann, who, to free his sight <strong>of</strong> your grotesque absurdities,went begg<strong>in</strong>g for help to <strong>the</strong> Jesuits and whose shameful conversiondishonours not him but you? Do you even dare to speak <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong>Schiller and not blush? Look at this picture! The flash<strong>in</strong>g eyes thatgaze contemptuously out over your heads, <strong>the</strong> deathly flushedcheeks - do <strong>the</strong>se say noth<strong>in</strong>g to you? Here was a glorious, div<strong>in</strong>e toywhich you broke. And if this curtailed and mortally harassed life hadbeen deprived <strong>of</strong> Goe<strong>the</strong>'s friendship it would have been your partto ext<strong>in</strong>guish it even sooner! None <strong>of</strong> your great geniuses has everreceived any assistance from you, and do you now want to make it adogma that none ever shall receive any? To each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m you werethat 'resistance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> obtuse world' which Goe<strong>the</strong> names <strong>in</strong> hisepilogue to Schiller's Glocke; to each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m you showed annoyanceand lack <strong>of</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g, or envious narrow-m<strong>in</strong>dedness, ormalice and egoism: it was <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> you <strong>the</strong>y created <strong>the</strong>ir works,aga<strong>in</strong>st you <strong>the</strong>y directed <strong>the</strong>ir attacks, and it was thanks to you <strong>the</strong>y"'Goe<strong>the</strong> to Eckermann, 7 February 1827.21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!