10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

David Strauss, <strong>the</strong> confessor and <strong>the</strong> writer<strong>of</strong>fice workers and soldiers, tradesman and landed proprietors, <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir thousands and by no means <strong>the</strong> worst <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land' - and who,when <strong>the</strong>y tell us <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir beliefs, bore us even more than when <strong>the</strong>ytell us <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir dreams. When <strong>the</strong>y choose to break <strong>the</strong>ir silence andnoise <strong>the</strong>ir confessions, <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir unisono must not beallowed to deceive us as to <strong>the</strong> poverty and vulgarity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tune <strong>the</strong>ys<strong>in</strong>g. How can <strong>the</strong> knowledge that a belief is shared by many make usmore favourably disposed towards it when we also know that if anyone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> many ventured to tell us <strong>of</strong> it we should not let him f<strong>in</strong>ishbut <strong>in</strong>terrupt him with a yawn? If you have such a belief, we shouldhave to tell him, for God's sake keep quiet about it. It may be that <strong>in</strong>earlier years a few simple people sought a th<strong>in</strong>ker <strong>in</strong> David Strauss:now <strong>the</strong>y have discovered him to be a believer and are disappo<strong>in</strong>ted.If he had stayed silent* he would have rema<strong>in</strong>ed a philosopher, atleast so far as <strong>the</strong>se people are concerned: now he is a philosopher tono one. But he no longer desires <strong>the</strong> honour <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g a th<strong>in</strong>ker; hewants only to be a new believer, and is proud <strong>of</strong> his 'new faith'. Confess<strong>in</strong>git <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g, he th<strong>in</strong>ks he is <strong>in</strong>scrib<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> catechism '<strong>of</strong> modernideas' and construct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> broad 'universal highway <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>future' . In fact, our philist<strong>in</strong>e no longer hesitates to say anyth<strong>in</strong>g, buthas grown self-assured to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> cynicism. There was a time- avery distant time, to be sure - when <strong>the</strong> philist<strong>in</strong>e was tolerated assometh<strong>in</strong>g that said noth<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>of</strong> which noth<strong>in</strong>g was said: <strong>the</strong>rewas ano<strong>the</strong>r time when one flattered his oddities, found him amus<strong>in</strong>gand talked about him. This attention gradually turned him <strong>in</strong>to acoxcomb and he began to take an <strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>ate pride <strong>in</strong> his odditiesand <strong>in</strong>genuous queer-headedness: now he himself talks, <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>manner <strong>of</strong> Riehl's music for <strong>the</strong> home. 'But what is this I see! Is itphantom or reality? How long and broad my poodle grows!'t Fornow he is already trundl<strong>in</strong>g like a hippopotamus along <strong>the</strong> 'universalhighway <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future' and his growl<strong>in</strong>g and bark<strong>in</strong>g has changed<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> proud accents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> founder <strong>of</strong> a religion. Are you perhapsth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, Master, <strong>of</strong> found<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> religion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future? 'It seems tome that <strong>the</strong> time has not yet come. It does not even occur to me towant to destroy any exist<strong>in</strong>g church' (p. 8). - But why not, Master? Allthat matters is that one is able to. Besides, to speak frankly, you yourselfbelieve you are able to: you have only to look at <strong>the</strong> last page <strong>of</strong>your book. There you say that your new highway 'is <strong>the</strong> sole uni-'''if he had stayed silent': <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s German version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> 'si tacuisses,philosophus mansisses'tFrom Goe<strong>the</strong>'s Fa ust, Part I Scene 3.15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!