Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997) Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

10.07.2015 Views

David Strauss) the confessor and the writer2If, however, our public and private life so manifesdy does not bearthe stamp of a productive and stylistically secure culture, if our greatartists, moreover, have admitted and continue to admit this dreadfuland, for a gifted people, profoundly humiliating fact, how is it possiblethat the greatest self-satisfaction nonetheless continues to reignamong educated Germans: a self-satisfaction which since the recentwar has shown itself ready to burst out in cries of jubilation andtriumph? In any event, there exists a steadfast belief that we are inpossession of a genuine culture: the enormous incongruity betweenthis complacent, indeed exultant belief and an in fact notoriouscultural deficiency seems to be apparent only to the select few. Forall those whose views coincide with public opinion have coveredtheir eyes and stopped their ears the incongruity must not beadmitted to exist. How is this possible? What force is so powerful asto dictate such a 'must not' ? What species of man must have come todominate in Germany that such strong and simple feelings can beprohibited and expression of them obstructed? I shall call thispower, this species of man, by its name - it is the · culturalphilistine.The word 'philistine', as is well known, belongs to the studentvocabulary, and signifies, in its wider, popular sense, the antithesisof a son of the muses, of the artist, of the man of genuine culture. Thecultural philistine, however - the study of whom, and the hearing ofwhose confessions when he makes them, has now become a disagreeableduty distinguishes himself from the general idea of thespecies 'philistine' through a superstition: he fancies that he is himselfa son of the muses and man of culture; an incomprehensibledelusion which reveals that he does not even know what a philistine,and the antithesis of a philistine, is: so we shall not be surprised tofind that usually he solemnly denies he is a philistine. With this lackof all self-knowledge, he feels firmly convinced that his 'culture' isthe complete expression of true German culture: , and since heeverywhere discovers cultivated people of his own kind, and finds allpublic institutions, schools and cultural and artistic bodies organizedin accordance with his kind of cultivation and in the service of hisrequirements, he also bears with him everywhere the triumphantfeeling of being the worthy representative of contemporary Germanculture and frames his demands and pretcn'Jions accordingly. If,however, true culture must in any event presuppose unity of style,7

Untimely Meditationsand even an inferior and degenerate culture cannot b thought of asfailing to exhibit a stylistic unity within which the manifoldphenomena which characterize it are harmonized, this confusionreigning in the deluded mind of the cultural philistine may wellorginate in i:he fact that, discovering everywhere identical reproductionsof himself, he infers from this identity of all 'cultivated'people the existence of a unity of style and thus the existence of aGerman culture. He perceives around him nothing but needs identicalwith and views similar to his own; wherever he goes he is at onceembraced by a bond of tacit conventions in regard to many things,especially in the realms of religion and art: this impressivehomogeneity, this tutti unisono* which no one commands but whichis always ready to break fo rth, seduces him to the belief that a culturehere holds sway. But systematic and oppressive philistinism doesnot constitute a culture, even an inferior culture, merely because itpossesses system: it must always be the antithesis of a culture,namely a permanendy estahlished barbarity. For that uniformitywhich is so striking in the cultivated pe0ple of Germany today is aunity only through the conscious or unconscious exclusion andnegation of every artistically productive form and the demand of atrue style. An unhappy contortion must have taken place in the brainof the cultural philistine: he regards as culture precisely that whichnegates culture, and since he is accustomed to proceed with consistencyhe finally acquires a coherent collection of such negations, asystem of un-culture, to which one might even concede a certain'unity of style' if it made any sense to speak of a barbarism with style.Ifhe is allowed to choose between a stylistically agreeable action andone of the opposite kind, he invariably elects the latter, and becausehe always does so all his actions bear the same negative stamp. It isprecisely this negative stamp which enables him to recognize thenature of the 'German culture' he has patented: whatever does notcorrespond to it he adjudges hostile and inimical to him. In this casethe cultural philistine does no more than defend himself: he denies,secretes, stops his ears, averts his eyes, he is a negative being even inhis hatred and hostility. The person he hates most of all, however, ishim who treats him as a philistine and tells him what he is: a hindranceto the strong and creative, a labyrinth for al i who doubt andgo astray, a swamp to the feet of the weary, a fetter to all who wouldpursue lofty goals, a poisonous mist to new buds, a parching desert"tutti unisono: everybody, together8

David Strauss) <strong>the</strong> confessor and <strong>the</strong> writer2If, however, our public and private life so manifesdy does not bear<strong>the</strong> stamp <strong>of</strong> a productive and stylistically secure culture, if our greatartists, moreover, have admitted and cont<strong>in</strong>ue to admit this dreadfuland, for a gifted people, pr<strong>of</strong>oundly humiliat<strong>in</strong>g fact, how is it possiblethat <strong>the</strong> greatest self-satisfaction none<strong>the</strong>less cont<strong>in</strong>ues to reignamong educated Germans: a self-satisfaction which s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> recentwar has shown itself ready to burst out <strong>in</strong> cries <strong>of</strong> jubilation andtriumph? In any event, <strong>the</strong>re exists a steadfast belief that we are <strong>in</strong>possession <strong>of</strong> a genu<strong>in</strong>e culture: <strong>the</strong> enormous <strong>in</strong>congruity betweenthis complacent, <strong>in</strong>deed exultant belief and an <strong>in</strong> fact notoriouscultural deficiency seems to be apparent only to <strong>the</strong> select few. Forall those whose views co<strong>in</strong>cide with public op<strong>in</strong>ion have covered<strong>the</strong>ir eyes and stopped <strong>the</strong>ir ears <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>congruity must not beadmitted to exist. How is this possible? What force is so powerful asto dictate such a 'must not' ? What species <strong>of</strong> man must have come todom<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> Germany that such strong and simple feel<strong>in</strong>gs can beprohibited and expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m obstructed? I shall call thispower, this species <strong>of</strong> man, by its name - it is <strong>the</strong> · culturalphilist<strong>in</strong>e.The word 'philist<strong>in</strong>e', as is well known, belongs to <strong>the</strong> studentvocabulary, and signifies, <strong>in</strong> its wider, popular sense, <strong>the</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis<strong>of</strong> a son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> muses, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> artist, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> man <strong>of</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>e culture. Thecultural philist<strong>in</strong>e, however - <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> whom, and <strong>the</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>whose confessions when he makes <strong>the</strong>m, has now become a disagreeableduty dist<strong>in</strong>guishes himself from <strong>the</strong> general idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>species 'philist<strong>in</strong>e' through a superstition: he fancies that he is himselfa son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> muses and man <strong>of</strong> culture; an <strong>in</strong>comprehensibledelusion which reveals that he does not even know what a philist<strong>in</strong>e,and <strong>the</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> a philist<strong>in</strong>e, is: so we shall not be surprised t<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>d that usually he solemnly denies he is a philist<strong>in</strong>e. With this lack<strong>of</strong> all self-knowledge, he feels firmly conv<strong>in</strong>ced that his 'culture' is<strong>the</strong> complete expression <strong>of</strong> true German culture: , and s<strong>in</strong>ce heeverywhere discovers cultivated people <strong>of</strong> his own k<strong>in</strong>d, and f<strong>in</strong>ds allpublic <strong>in</strong>stitutions, schools and cultural and artistic bodies organized<strong>in</strong> accordance with his k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> cultivation and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> hisrequirements, he also bears with him everywhere <strong>the</strong> triumphantfeel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> worthy representative <strong>of</strong> contemporary Germanculture and frames his demands and pretcn'Jions accord<strong>in</strong>gly. If,however, true culture must <strong>in</strong> any event presuppose unity <strong>of</strong> style,7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!