10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Note on <strong>the</strong> textattack upon <strong>the</strong> sovereignty <strong>of</strong> 'public op<strong>in</strong>ion' as an arbiter <strong>of</strong>taste, values and truth itself. (Ours, he rem<strong>in</strong>ds us <strong>in</strong> section 2 <strong>of</strong>Schopenhauer as Educator, is '<strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> public op<strong>in</strong>ion'.) Whereas<strong>the</strong> slave <strong>of</strong> public op<strong>in</strong>ion strives always to be 'timely', a declaredcritic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same will <strong>in</strong>stead flaunt his deliberate 'untimel<strong>in</strong>ess'.As <strong>Nietzsche</strong> expla<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> section 8 <strong>of</strong> Strauss, public op<strong>in</strong>ionprides itself on speak<strong>in</strong>g with a s<strong>in</strong>gle voice, <strong>the</strong>reby forc<strong>in</strong>g anyonewho disagrees to adopt a posture <strong>of</strong> conscious opposition. IfStrauss's The Old and <strong>the</strong> New Faith can be described (as it isdescribed by <strong>Nietzsche</strong>) as 'timely', <strong>the</strong>n <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s attack uponit has to be described as 'untimely'.There are also two o<strong>the</strong>r senses, both expounded upon by<strong>Nietzsche</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foreword to <strong>the</strong> second Meditation, <strong>in</strong> which<strong>the</strong>se texts might be considered 'untimely', and both are relatedto <strong>the</strong> perspective from which <strong>the</strong>ir author claims to conduct hiscritique <strong>of</strong> 'timely' ideas and <strong>in</strong>stitutions. In <strong>the</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance,<strong>Nietzsche</strong> writes as an 'untimely' author <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that hewrites as one who is well-acqua<strong>in</strong>ted and'1mbued with <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong>Greek antiquity. He even ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that it is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chiefvirtues <strong>of</strong> his own discipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> classical philology that it can - orat least should - provide one with a much needed, 'classical' perspectiveon <strong>the</strong> present day. Observations made possible by sucha perspective are perforce 'untimely', because, as <strong>Nietzsche</strong>remarks <strong>in</strong> section 2 <strong>of</strong> Schopenhauer as Educator, modern menmust always appear wretched <strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> ancients.Second, his perspective on <strong>the</strong> present is 'untimely' preciselybecause <strong>of</strong> his urgent concern with <strong>the</strong> fu ture. Anyone as preoccupiedas <strong>Nietzsche</strong> with <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> a new cultural rebirth hasno choice but to be a 'fighter' not only aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> past, but alsoaga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> present. (A similar po<strong>in</strong>t is made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourthMeditation <strong>in</strong> praise <strong>of</strong> Wagner's 'art <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future'.) <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'sown <strong>Meditations</strong> are <strong>the</strong>refore 'untimely' because <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m he presumesto evaluate <strong>the</strong> present from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong>past and <strong>the</strong> future. But <strong>the</strong>re is also, as already noted, a constantnote <strong>of</strong> transparent irony <strong>in</strong> this use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term 'untimely', s<strong>in</strong>ce<strong>the</strong> author believes that noth<strong>in</strong>g is more needed by our own age -and thus noth<strong>in</strong>g is more 'timely' than precisely <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong>'untimel<strong>in</strong>ess' represented by <strong>the</strong>se very texts, a po<strong>in</strong>t that isaffirmed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> conclud<strong>in</strong>g paragraph <strong>of</strong> Strauss.F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>Nietzsche</strong> thought <strong>of</strong> himself as 'untimely' <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r,more personal sense, <strong>the</strong> same sense <strong>in</strong> which every orig<strong>in</strong>alxlvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!