10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Schopenhauer as educatortowards it lightly; fo r he who has <strong>the</strong> furor philosophicus * with<strong>in</strong> himwill already no longer have time fo r <strong>the</strong> furor politicust and will wiselyrefra<strong>in</strong> from read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> newspapers every day, let alone work<strong>in</strong>g fora political party: though he will not hesitate for a moment to be at hisplace when his fa<strong>the</strong>rland experiences a real emergency. Every state<strong>in</strong> which anyone o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> statesman has to concern himselfwith politics is ill organized and deserves to perish by all <strong>the</strong>sepoliticians.Ano<strong>the</strong>r great advantage Schopenhauer enj oyed was <strong>the</strong> fact tha<strong>the</strong> was not brought up dest<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> first to be a scholar, butactually worked for a time, if with reluctance, <strong>in</strong> a merchant's <strong>of</strong>ficeand <strong>in</strong> any event brea<strong>the</strong>d throughout his entire youth <strong>the</strong> freer air <strong>of</strong>a great mercantile house. A scholar can never become a philosopher;fo r even Kant was unable to do so but, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>born pressure <strong>of</strong> hisgenius notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g, rema<strong>in</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> end as it were <strong>in</strong> a chrysalisstage. Hewho th<strong>in</strong>ks that <strong>in</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g this I am do<strong>in</strong>g Kant an <strong>in</strong>justicedoes not know what a philosopher is, namely not merely a great th<strong>in</strong>kerbut also a real human be<strong>in</strong>g; and when did a schoar ever become areal human be<strong>in</strong>g? He who lets concepts, op<strong>in</strong>ions, past events,books, step between himself and th<strong>in</strong>gs - he, that is to say, who is <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> broadest sense born for history - will never have an immediateperception <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gs and will never be an immediately perceivedth<strong>in</strong>g himself; but both <strong>the</strong>se conditions belong toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>philosopher, because most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction he receives he has toacquire out <strong>of</strong> himself and because he serves himself as a reflectionand brief abstract <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole world. If a man perceives himself bymeans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, it is no wonder ifhe sees <strong>in</strong> himselfnoth<strong>in</strong>g but <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs! And that is how scholars are, liveand see. Schopenhauer, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, had <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>describablegood fortune to be able to see genius from close up not only <strong>in</strong> himself,but also outside himself <strong>in</strong> Goe<strong>the</strong>: through this tw<strong>of</strong>old reflectionhe was aware <strong>of</strong> and wise to all scholarly goals and cultures from<strong>the</strong> ground up. By virtue <strong>of</strong> this experience he knew what <strong>the</strong> strongand free human be<strong>in</strong>g for which every artistic culture longs must belike; given this <strong>in</strong>sight, how could he have had much desire left to<strong>in</strong>volve himself with so-called 'art' <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholarly or hypocritical*furor philosophicus: philosophical passiont furor politicus: political passion181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!