Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997) Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

10.07.2015 Views

IntroductionIi1A new coolness nevertheless seems detectable in Nietzsche'srelationship with the Wagners, beginning perhaps during his visitto Bayreuth in August 1874, when he and Wagner quarrelledopenly over Nietzsche's admiration for Wagner's great rival,Brahms, and over other musical matters. Nietzsche subsequentlyturned down repeated invitations from the Wagners to spend theChristmas holidays 1874 with them and to attend the rehearsalsscheduled for summer 1875. (Wagner's plan called for a summerof rehearsals a year prior to the actual first performance of theRing cycle.) It was under these circumstances that he began towrite Richard Wagner in Bayreuth. Though he had mentioned aMeditation with this title more than a year earlier (in a letter toGersdorff of 11 February 1874), it is difficult not to see his decisionto revive this project as an effort to demonstrate his fealty tothe maestro who was irritated by his absence from Bayreuth thatsummer.Whatever Nietzsche's· actual reasons for beginning this newessay may have been, he soon began to have serious reservationsabout continuing the series of Untimely Meditations, and, in a letterof 7 October 1875, he confided to Rohde that he was abandoningthe Meditation on Wagner on the grounds that 'it is of value onlyfor me, as a way of orienting myself with respect to the most difficultpoints of our recent experience'. It was around this sametime that a young musician named Heinrich Koselitz, who, atNietzsche's suggestion, adopted the stage name 'Peter Gast',entered his orbit and began to serve as his assistant; and it islargely due to Gast's intervention that the fourth UntimelyMeditation was ever published at all. Gast read the unfinished manuscriptof Wagner in Bayreuth in Spring 1876 and insisted that itshould be completed and published. Once again Nietzsche maintainedthat the piece> was too 'personal' for publication, thoughhe agreed to allow Gast to make a fair copy for presentation toWagner on his birthday (22 May) . Eventually, however, he decidedinstead to add some additional material to this manuscript and,as he had intended, have it published as the fourth UntimelyMeditation. Printing was completed over the summer, andNietzsche was able to present Wagner with a copy in August, duringthe first Bayreuth festival.Richard Wagner in Bayreuth remains to this day one ofNietzsche's least popular and least read works, and it is not difficultto see why. It wholly lacks the stylistic unity of the other threexxi

IntroductionUntimely Meditations, in part, perhaps, because it contains so many(usually unidentified) quotations from and paraphrases ofWagner's overwrought prose. Even for the specialist, it is a difficultand sometimes painful work to read, and one suspects that itmust have been an equally difficult and painful book forNietzsche to write. There is certainly something forced and deeplyambivalent about the overall tone of this essay, and again one suspectsthat this is an all-too-accurate reflection of the author's ownprofound ambivalence about his subject.Just as Schopenhauer as Educator was written some years afterNietzsche had ceased to be an adherent of Schopenhauer's philosophy,so was Wa gner in Bayreuth written at a point in his lifewhen he had already formulated (albeit only privately) the basicelements of the devastating critique of Wagner as a 'histrionicromantic' that he would make public only many years later.Schopenhauer, however, was dead, whereas Wagner was not onlyvery much alive, but was also extremely sensitive to any appearanceof criticism or disloyalty on the par of his friends and allies.Hence Nietzsche's dilemma: he did admire Wagner and was cer-,tainly grateful to him (as to Schopenhauer) for the inspiration ofhis example and for his assistance in helping Nietzsche 'becomehimself'; on the other hand, he harboured increasingly seriousreservations about Wagner's art and personality, not to mention,his even stronger reservations about Bayreuth and the'Wagnerians'. The problem was how to write a book, intended forthe public, in which he could express his admiration without violating his intellectual integrity. Though it cannot be said thatNietzsche succeeded fully in resolving this problem, his strategyseems clear: to use Wagner's own words against Wagner himself.By quoting copiously from his writings, Nietzsche would erect acertain (Wagnerian) ideal of art and of culture, an ideal to whichhe himself once subscribed whole-heartedly and to which hecould still subscribe at least in part. It would then be left up to thereaders to determine for themselves - assisted, perhaps, by a fewdiscreet suggestions from the author - how far short Wagner'sactual achievement was from this ideal.Despite the difficulties of 'reading' the fourth Meditation - orperhaps because of them - Wa gner in Bayreuth remains a key documentfor anyone interested in Nietzsche's biography and intellectualdevelopment. Its interest, however, is not merely psychobiographical;it too contains its share of stimulating and originalxxii

Introduction<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>, <strong>in</strong> part, perhaps, because it conta<strong>in</strong>s so many(usually unidentified) quotations from and paraphrases <strong>of</strong>Wagner's overwrought prose. Even for <strong>the</strong> specialist, it is a difficultand sometimes pa<strong>in</strong>ful work to read, and one suspects that itmust have been an equally difficult and pa<strong>in</strong>ful book for<strong>Nietzsche</strong> to write. There is certa<strong>in</strong>ly someth<strong>in</strong>g forced and deeplyambivalent about <strong>the</strong> overall tone <strong>of</strong> this essay, and aga<strong>in</strong> one suspectsthat this is an all-too-accurate reflection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author's ownpr<strong>of</strong>ound ambivalence about his subject.Just as Schopenhauer as Educator was written some years after<strong>Nietzsche</strong> had ceased to be an adherent <strong>of</strong> Schopenhauer's philosophy,so was Wa gner <strong>in</strong> Bayreuth written at a po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> his lifewhen he had already formulated (albeit only privately) <strong>the</strong> basicelements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> devastat<strong>in</strong>g critique <strong>of</strong> Wagner as a 'histrionicromantic' that he would make public only many years later.Schopenhauer, however, was dead, whereas Wagner was not onlyvery much alive, but was also extremely sensitive to any appearance<strong>of</strong> criticism or disloyalty on <strong>the</strong> par <strong>of</strong> his friends and allies.Hence <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s dilemma: he did admire Wagner and was cer-,ta<strong>in</strong>ly grateful to him (as to Schopenhauer) for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>spiration <strong>of</strong>his example and for his assistance <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Nietzsche</strong> 'becomehimself'; on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, he harboured <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly seriousreservations about Wagner's art and personality, not to mention,his even stronger reservations about Bayreuth and <strong>the</strong>'Wagnerians'. The problem was how to write a book, <strong>in</strong>tended for<strong>the</strong> public, <strong>in</strong> which he could express his admiration without violat<strong>in</strong>g his <strong>in</strong>tellectual <strong>in</strong>tegrity. Though it cannot be said that<strong>Nietzsche</strong> succeeded fully <strong>in</strong> resolv<strong>in</strong>g this problem, his strategyseems clear: to use Wagner's own words aga<strong>in</strong>st Wagner himself.By quot<strong>in</strong>g copiously from his writ<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>Nietzsche</strong> would erect acerta<strong>in</strong> (Wagnerian) ideal <strong>of</strong> art and <strong>of</strong> culture, an ideal to whichhe himself once subscribed whole-heartedly and to which hecould still subscribe at least <strong>in</strong> part. It would <strong>the</strong>n be left up to <strong>the</strong>readers to determ<strong>in</strong>e for <strong>the</strong>mselves - assisted, perhaps, by a fewdiscreet suggestions from <strong>the</strong> author - how far short Wagner'sactual achievement was from this ideal.Despite <strong>the</strong> difficulties <strong>of</strong> 'read<strong>in</strong>g' <strong>the</strong> fourth Meditation - orperhaps because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m - Wa gner <strong>in</strong> Bayreuth rema<strong>in</strong>s a key documentfor anyone <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s biography and <strong>in</strong>tellectualdevelopment. Its <strong>in</strong>terest, however, is not merely psychobiographical;it too conta<strong>in</strong>s its share <strong>of</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>g and orig<strong>in</strong>alxxii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!