10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>unfruitful - a consequence <strong>of</strong> how he comes <strong>in</strong>to exi'stence! - and tha<strong>the</strong> harbours · a certa<strong>in</strong> natural hatred for <strong>the</strong> fruitful man; which iswhy geniuses and scholars have at all times been at odds with oneano<strong>the</strong>r. For <strong>the</strong> latter want to kill, dissect and understand nature,while <strong>the</strong> former want to augment nature with new liv<strong>in</strong>g nature; andso <strong>the</strong>re exists a conflict <strong>of</strong> activities and <strong>in</strong>tentions. Wholly fortunateages did not need <strong>the</strong> scholar and did not know him, wholly morbidand listless ages have valued him as <strong>the</strong> highest and most venerable<strong>of</strong> men and accorded him <strong>the</strong> highest rank.How it stands with our own age <strong>in</strong> regard to health and sickness ­who is sufficient <strong>of</strong> a physician to know that! Certa<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> scholar is<strong>in</strong> very many ways still too highly valued, which has a harmful effectespecially <strong>in</strong> all that concerns <strong>the</strong> evolv<strong>in</strong>g genius. The scholar hasno heart for <strong>the</strong> latter's distress; he speaks past him <strong>in</strong> a sharp, coldvoice, and all too soon he shrugs his shoulders as though over someth<strong>in</strong>gqueer and strange for which he has nei<strong>the</strong>r time nor <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation.Knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> culture cannot be found <strong>in</strong> himei<strong>the</strong>r. -tBut what have we ga<strong>in</strong>ed at all from <strong>the</strong>se reflections? Theknowledge that where today culture seems to be most vigorouslypursued noth<strong>in</strong>g is known <strong>of</strong> this goal. However loudly <strong>the</strong> state mayproclaim its service to culture, it fur<strong>the</strong>rs culture <strong>in</strong> order to fur<strong>the</strong>ritself and cannot conceive <strong>of</strong> a goal higher than its own welfare andcont<strong>in</strong>ued existence. What <strong>the</strong> money-makers really want when <strong>the</strong>yceaselessly demand <strong>in</strong>struction and education is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last resortprecisely money. When those who require form ascribe to <strong>the</strong>mselves<strong>the</strong> actual labour on behalf <strong>of</strong> culture and op<strong>in</strong>e, for <strong>in</strong>stance, that allart belongs to <strong>the</strong>m and must stand <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir requirements,what is quite clear is that by affirm<strong>in</strong>g culture <strong>the</strong>y are merelyaffirm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves: that <strong>the</strong>y too are <strong>the</strong>refore still <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> amisunderstand<strong>in</strong>g. Enough has been said <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholarly man <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g. And so we see that, however zealous all four powers .toge<strong>the</strong>r may be <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir own <strong>in</strong>terests with <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> cul..lture, <strong>the</strong>y are dull and without <strong>in</strong>spiration when <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>terests arenot <strong>in</strong>volved. And that is why <strong>the</strong> conditions for <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> genius have not improved <strong>in</strong> modern times, and why antipathy fororig<strong>in</strong>al men has <strong>in</strong>creased to such an extent that Socrates could nothave lived among us and would <strong>in</strong> any event not have atta<strong>in</strong>edseventy.N ow I recall <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me I developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> third section: that ourwhole modern world has so little <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> permanence and174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!