10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introductionbecause he contends that <strong>the</strong> real achievement <strong>of</strong> any philosopher -Schopenhauer <strong>in</strong>cluded - lies precisely <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> example he providesto o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> '<strong>the</strong> courageous visibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> philosophical life'(p. 137).To be 'educated' by a philosopher, <strong>the</strong>refore, has noth<strong>in</strong>g to dowith subscrib<strong>in</strong>g to his favourite <strong>the</strong>ories or philosophical doctr<strong>in</strong>es:one is educated by Schopenhauer if one's own manner <strong>of</strong>liv<strong>in</strong>g has been decisively affected by his 'example'. The word'example' is here placed with<strong>in</strong> quotation marks for <strong>the</strong> simplereason that <strong>the</strong> 'example' provided to <strong>Nietzsche</strong> by Schopenhauerwas not really that <strong>of</strong> his actual life, though <strong>Nietzsche</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>lydid admire him for his rejection <strong>of</strong> all academic and <strong>in</strong>stitutionalties <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> a more <strong>in</strong>dependent mode <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g. Though afew anecdotes are spr<strong>in</strong>kled throughout <strong>the</strong> third Meditation,<strong>Nietzsche</strong> is clearly not <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> relat<strong>in</strong>g Schopenhauer'sbiography. What he holds up to his readers <strong>in</strong>stead is someth<strong>in</strong>galtoge<strong>the</strong>r different, a mere 'image' <strong>of</strong> human life: not an idealizedversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual person, Arthur t;chopenhauer; still less,an ideal embodiment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world-deny<strong>in</strong>g philosophy expounded<strong>in</strong> The World as Will and Representation; but ra<strong>the</strong>r, '<strong>the</strong>'Schopenhauerian image <strong>of</strong> man' (pp. 152-5) .What directly <strong>in</strong>spired - and thus educated - <strong>the</strong> young<strong>Nietzsche</strong> was a certa<strong>in</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> human possibility, an image <strong>of</strong> a ,particular way <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>of</strong> a particular k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> person, animage that he apparently constructed for himself as he cont<strong>in</strong>uedto read and to reflect upon Schopenhauer throughout <strong>the</strong> late1860s and early 1870s. <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'Schopenhauerianman', whom he describes as 'voluntarily tak<strong>in</strong>g upon himself <strong>the</strong>suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g truthful' (p. 152) and as a 'destroy<strong>in</strong>ggenius',15 resembles nei<strong>the</strong>r Arthur Schopenhauer himself norSchopenhauer's ideal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world-deny<strong>in</strong>g 'sa<strong>in</strong>t', but is <strong>in</strong>stead aproduct <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s own philosophical imag<strong>in</strong>ation. He associatedthis image with Schopenhauer primarily out <strong>of</strong> simple gratitudefor <strong>the</strong> fact that he had arrived at this 'image <strong>of</strong> human life'through years <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed, critical reflection upon Schopenhauer'sarguments and assumptions - as well, no doubt, as throughreflection upon <strong>the</strong> well-documented contradiction betweenSchopenhauer's life and his philosophy.1 6That <strong>Nietzsche</strong> drew from his personal encounter withSchopenhauer's philosophy conclusions radically at odds withthose drawn by Schopenhauer himself does not imply that <strong>the</strong>re isxviii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!