Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997) Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

10.07.2015 Views

On the uses and disadvantages . of history fo r lifeand greed, falls apart and ceases to be a people; in its place systemsof individualist egoism, brotherhoods for the rapaciousexploitation of the non-brothers, and similar creations of utilitarianvulgarity may perhaps appear in the arena of the fu ture. To preparethe way fo r these creations all one has to do is to go on writing historyfr om the standpoint of the masses and seeking to derive the lawswhich govern it from the needs of these masses, that is to say fr omthe'laws which move the lowest mud- and clay-strata of society. Themasses seem to me to deserve notice in three respects only: first asfaded copies of great men produced on poor paper with worn-outplates, then as a force of resistance to great men, finally as instrumentsin the hands of great men; for the rest, let the Devil and statistics takethem! What, can statistics prove that there are laws in history? Laws?They certainly prove how vulgar and nauseatingly uniform the massesare: but are the effects of inertia, stupidity, mimicry, love and hungerto be called laws? Well, let us suppose they are: that, however, onlygoes to confirm the proposition that so far as there are ls in historythe laws are worthless and the history is also worthless. But the kindof history at present universally prized is precisely the kind that takesthe great mass-drives for the chief and weightiest facts of history andregards great men as being no more than their clearest expression,as it were bubbles visible on the surface of the flood. Greatness is,under this supposition, the product of the masses, which is to sayorder is the product of chaos; and it is only natural that in the end thehymn of praise is sung to the masses that produce it. That which hasmoved these masses fo r any length of time and has become what iscalled 'a power in history' is then accorded the name 'great' . But isthat not a quite deliberate confusion of quantity with quality? Whenthe rude masses have found some idea or other, a religious idea fo rinstance, to their liking, strenuously defended it and dragged italong with them for centuries, then and only then is the inventor andfounder of this idea to be called great. But why! The noblest andmost exalted things make no effect whatever on the masses; the historicalsuccess of Christianity, its power in history, its tenacity anddurability, happily proves nothing with respect to the greatness of itsfo under, for if it did it would be evidence against him: between himand that historical success there lies a very dark and earthy stratum ofpassion, error, thirst for power and honour, of the continuingstrength of the imperium romanum, a stratum from which Christianityacquired the earthly residue and taste which made possible its continuancein this world and bestowed upon it as it were its tenability.Greatness ought not to depend on success: Demosthenes possessed

Untimely Meditationsgreatness though he had no success. The purest and truest adherentsof Christianity have always hindered and called into question itsworldly success and so-called 'power in history' rather than promotedthem; for they were accustomed to place themselves outsidethe 'world' and had no regard for the 'process of the Christian idea';for which reason they have as a rule remained wholly unknown andanonymous to history. Expressed in Christian terms: the Devil is theregent of this world and the lord of success and progress: in all thepowers in history he is the actual power, and that is essentially how itwill always remain - even though the fact may be painful to the earsof an age accustomed to the idolization of success and power in history.For it is an age that is practised in bestowing new names on thingsand has even rebaptized the Devil. I t is indeed the hour of a greatperil: mankind seems near to discovering that the egoism ofindividuals, groups or the masses has at all times been the lever ofthe movements of history; at the same time, however, this discoveryhas caused no perturbation of any kind, but on the contrary it hasnow been decreed: egoism shall be our iod. In this new faith one isnow setting to work with the clearest deliberation to erect the historyof the future on the foundation of egoism: only it is to be a more prudentegoism than heretofore, an egoism which imposes certain re'"straints upon itself so as to ensure its endurance, an egoism whichstudies history precisely so as to become acquainted with that earlierimprudent egoism. In the course of this study it has been learnedthat a quite special role in the founding of the world-system ofegoism devolves upon the state: it has to be the patron of all the prudentego isms so as to protect them with its military and police forcesagainst the terrifying outbreaks to which imprudent egoism is liable.I t is to the same end that history - the evolutionary history of animaland man - is carefully inculcated into the dangerous, becauseimprudent, masses and working classes: one knows that a grain ofhistorical culture is capable of breaking down dull and rude instinctsand desires or of leading them into the path of a refined egoism. Insumma: mankind is now, in the words of E. von Hartmann, 'with athoughtful eye to the future taking into consideration a practicaldomestic establishment in the earthly homeland'. The same writercalls this period the 'manhood of mankind', and thereby mocks atthat which is now called 'man' as though what is understood by thisword were simply the sober self-seeker; just as he likewise prophesiesan old-age to follow this period of manhood, though again heclearly means only to mock at our contemporary grey-beards: for he114

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>greatness though he had no success. The purest and truest adherents<strong>of</strong> Christianity have always h<strong>in</strong>dered and called <strong>in</strong>to question itsworldly success and so-called 'power <strong>in</strong> history' ra<strong>the</strong>r than promoted<strong>the</strong>m; for <strong>the</strong>y were accustomed to place <strong>the</strong>mselves outside<strong>the</strong> 'world' and had no regard for <strong>the</strong> 'process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian idea';for which reason <strong>the</strong>y have as a rule rema<strong>in</strong>ed wholly unknown andanonymous to history. Expressed <strong>in</strong> Christian terms: <strong>the</strong> Devil is <strong>the</strong>regent <strong>of</strong> this world and <strong>the</strong> lord <strong>of</strong> success and progress: <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong>powers <strong>in</strong> history he is <strong>the</strong> actual power, and that is essentially how itwill always rema<strong>in</strong> - even though <strong>the</strong> fact may be pa<strong>in</strong>ful to <strong>the</strong> ears<strong>of</strong> an age accustomed to <strong>the</strong> idolization <strong>of</strong> success and power <strong>in</strong> history.For it is an age that is practised <strong>in</strong> bestow<strong>in</strong>g new names on th<strong>in</strong>gsand has even rebaptized <strong>the</strong> Devil. I t is <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>the</strong> hour <strong>of</strong> a greatperil: mank<strong>in</strong>d seems near to discover<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> egoism <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals, groups or <strong>the</strong> masses has at all times been <strong>the</strong> lever <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> movements <strong>of</strong> history; at <strong>the</strong> same time, however, this discoveryhas caused no perturbation <strong>of</strong> any k<strong>in</strong>d, but on <strong>the</strong> contrary it hasnow been decreed: egoism shall be our iod. In this new faith one isnow sett<strong>in</strong>g to work with <strong>the</strong> clearest deliberation to erect <strong>the</strong> history<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future on <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> egoism: only it is to be a more prudentegoism than heret<strong>of</strong>ore, an egoism which imposes certa<strong>in</strong> re'"stra<strong>in</strong>ts upon itself so as to ensure its endurance, an egoism whichstudies history precisely so as to become acqua<strong>in</strong>ted with that earlierimprudent egoism. In <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> this study it has been learnedthat a quite special role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> found<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world-system <strong>of</strong>egoism devolves upon <strong>the</strong> state: it has to be <strong>the</strong> patron <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> prudentego isms so as to protect <strong>the</strong>m with its military and police forcesaga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> terrify<strong>in</strong>g outbreaks to which imprudent egoism is liable.I t is to <strong>the</strong> same end that history - <strong>the</strong> evolutionary history <strong>of</strong> animaland man - is carefully <strong>in</strong>culcated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> dangerous, becauseimprudent, masses and work<strong>in</strong>g classes: one knows that a gra<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>historical culture is capable <strong>of</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g down dull and rude <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctsand desires or <strong>of</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> path <strong>of</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ed egoism. Insumma: mank<strong>in</strong>d is now, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> E. von Hartmann, 'with athoughtful eye to <strong>the</strong> future tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to consideration a practicaldomestic establishment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earthly homeland'. The same writercalls this period <strong>the</strong> 'manhood <strong>of</strong> mank<strong>in</strong>d', and <strong>the</strong>reby mocks atthat which is now called 'man' as though what is understood by thisword were simply <strong>the</strong> sober self-seeker; just as he likewise prophesiesan old-age to follow this period <strong>of</strong> manhood, though aga<strong>in</strong> heclearly means only to mock at our contemporary grey-beards: for he114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!