10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On <strong>the</strong> uses and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> history for lifewithout smil<strong>in</strong>g; for <strong>the</strong>y will call to m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> time whenHartmann's parodistic gospel was listened to, absorbed, attacked,revered, propagated and canonized with all <strong>the</strong> simple honesty<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'German m<strong>in</strong>d', <strong>in</strong>deed with '<strong>the</strong> wry earnestness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>owl', as Goe<strong>the</strong> puts it. But <strong>the</strong> world must get on, that idealcondition will not be created by dream<strong>in</strong>g, it must be fo ught andstruggled for, and <strong>the</strong> path to redemption from that owlish earnestnesslies only through cheerfulness. The time will come when onewill prudently refra<strong>in</strong> from all constructions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world-process oreven <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> man; a time when one will regard not <strong>the</strong>masses but <strong>in</strong>dividuals, who form a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> bridge across <strong>the</strong> turbulentstream <strong>of</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g. These <strong>in</strong>dividuals do not carry forwardany k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> process but live contemporaneously with one ano<strong>the</strong>r;thanks to history, which permits such a collaboration, <strong>the</strong>y live asthat republic <strong>of</strong> genius <strong>of</strong> which Schopenhauer once spoke; onegiant calls to ano<strong>the</strong>r across <strong>the</strong> desert <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>of</strong> time and, undisturbedby <strong>the</strong> excited chatter<strong>in</strong>g dwarfs who creep about beneath<strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> exalted spirit-dialogue goes on. It is <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> history tobe <strong>the</strong> mediator between <strong>the</strong>m and thus aga<strong>in</strong> and aga<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>spireand lend <strong>the</strong> strength for <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great man. No,<strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> humanity cannot lie <strong>in</strong> its end but only <strong>in</strong> its highestexemplars.Our comedian has, <strong>of</strong> course, a different po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view, and withthat admirable dialectic which is as genu<strong>in</strong>e as its admirers areadmirable he tells us: 'The concept <strong>of</strong> evolution is not compatiblewith ascrib<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> world-process an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite duration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past,s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>n every conceivable evolution must have already been runthrough, which is not <strong>the</strong> case (oh rogue!); so likewise we cannot concedeto <strong>the</strong> process an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite duration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fu ture; both wouldannul <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> evolution towards a goal (rogue aga<strong>in</strong>!) andwould make <strong>the</strong> world-process resemble <strong>the</strong> Danaides' water-jugs.The complete victory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> logical over <strong>the</strong> illogical (oh rogue <strong>of</strong>rogues!) must, however, co<strong>in</strong>cide with <strong>the</strong> temporal end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world-process, <strong>the</strong> Last Day.' No, you alert and mock<strong>in</strong>g spirit, aslong as <strong>the</strong> illogical reigns as it does today, as long, fo r example, asone can speak <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'world-process' as you speak <strong>of</strong> it and ga<strong>in</strong>universal applause, <strong>the</strong> Last Day is still far <strong>of</strong>f: fo r it is still too cheerfulon this earth, many illusions still flourish, fo r example <strong>the</strong> illusionyour contemporaries harbour about you, we are not yet ready to behurled back <strong>in</strong>to your noth<strong>in</strong>gness: for we believe that it will be evenmerrier here once people have begun to understand you, you misunderstoodreader <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unconscious. If, however, disgust should

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!