10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On <strong>the</strong> uses and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> history for lifeits creator as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first philosophical parodists <strong>of</strong> all time; letus <strong>the</strong>refore sacrifice on his altar, let us sacrifice to him, <strong>the</strong> discoverer<strong>of</strong> a true universal medic<strong>in</strong>e, a lock <strong>of</strong> hair - to steal one<strong>of</strong> Schleiermacher's terms for express<strong>in</strong>g admiration. For whatmedic<strong>in</strong>e could be more efficacious aga<strong>in</strong>st excess <strong>of</strong> historicalculture than Hartmann's parody <strong>of</strong> world-history?Expressed without <strong>the</strong> rhetoric, what Hartmann proclaims to usfrom <strong>the</strong> smokey tripod <strong>of</strong> unconscious irony amounts to this: hetells us it would be quite sufficient, fo r our time to be exactly as it is,to br<strong>in</strong>g about, eventually, a condition <strong>in</strong> which people would f<strong>in</strong>dthis existence <strong>in</strong>tolerable: which we truly believe. This dreadfulossification <strong>of</strong> our age, this restless rattl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bones - such asDavid Strauss has naively described to us as <strong>the</strong> fai rest factuality - isjustified by Hartmann, not only from beh<strong>in</strong>d, ex causis efficientibus,but even from <strong>in</strong> front, ex causa f<strong>in</strong>ali; <strong>the</strong> rogue illum<strong>in</strong>es our agewith <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Last Day, and it turns out that our age is a veryf<strong>in</strong>e one, especially for him who wants to suffer as acutely as possiblefrom <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>digestibility <strong>of</strong> life and for whom <strong>the</strong>refore that Last Daycannot come quickly enough. It is true that Hartmann calls <strong>the</strong> time<strong>of</strong> life mank<strong>in</strong>d is now approach<strong>in</strong>g its 'years <strong>of</strong> manhood': but bythis he means <strong>the</strong> happy condition <strong>in</strong> wh ich all that is left is 'solidmediocrity', art is that which 'perhaps <strong>of</strong>fers enterta<strong>in</strong>ment to <strong>the</strong>Berl<strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>essman <strong>of</strong> an even<strong>in</strong>g', <strong>in</strong> which '<strong>the</strong> age no longerrequires genius, because it would mean cast<strong>in</strong>g pearls before sw<strong>in</strong>eor because <strong>the</strong> age has advanced beyond <strong>the</strong> stage appropriate togeniuses to a more important one' - to a stage <strong>of</strong> social evolution,that is to say, at which every worker, 'hav<strong>in</strong>g a workday which leaveshim adequate leisure fo r <strong>in</strong>tellectual tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, leads a comfortableexistence'. Rogue <strong>of</strong> rogues, you give voice to <strong>the</strong> long<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> contemporarymank<strong>in</strong>d: but you likewise know <strong>the</strong> spectre that willstand at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se years <strong>of</strong> manhood as an outcome <strong>of</strong> that<strong>in</strong>tellectual tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> solid mediocrity - disgust. Th<strong>in</strong>gs are already<strong>in</strong> a visibly sorry state, but <strong>the</strong>y will get very much sorrier, '<strong>the</strong> Anti­Christ is visibly extend<strong>in</strong>g his <strong>in</strong>fluence wi der and wider' - but that ishow it must be, that is what it must come to, for <strong>the</strong> road we have takencan lead only to disgust with all existence. 'Let us <strong>the</strong>refore press <strong>the</strong>world-process vigorously fo rward as workers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> v<strong>in</strong>eyard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Lord, fo r it is <strong>the</strong> process alone that can lead to redemption!'The v<strong>in</strong>eyard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord! The process! Redemption! Who cannotsee and hear <strong>in</strong> this how historical culture, which knows only <strong>the</strong>word 'becom<strong>in</strong>g', is here deliberately disguis<strong>in</strong>g itself as a parodistic109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!