Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997) Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

10.07.2015 Views

On the uses and disadvantages of history for lifeliving knowledge of the history of great men, you will learn from it asupreme commandment: to become mature and to flee from thatparalyzing upbringing of the present age which sees its advantage inpreventing your growth so as to rule and exploit you to the full whileyou are still immature. And if you want biographies, do hot desirethose which bear the legend ' Herr So-and-So and his age' , but thoseupon whose title-page there would stand 'a fighter against his age'.Satiate your soul with Plutarch and when you believe in his heroesdare at the same time to believe in yourself. With a hundred suchmen - raised in this unmodern way, that is to say become matureand accustomed to the heroic - the whole noisy sham-culture of ourage could now be silenced fo r ever. -7When the historical sense reigns without restraint, and all its consequencesare realized, it uproots the future because it destroys illusionsand robs the things that exist of the atmosphere in which alonethey can live. Historical justice, even when it is genuine and practisedwith the purest of intentions, is therefore a dreadful virtue because italways undermines the living thing and brings it down: its judgmentis always annihilating. If the historical drive does not also contain adrive to construct, if the purpose of destroying and,clearing is not toallow a future already alive in anticipation to raise its house on theground thus liberated, if justice alone prevails, then the instinct fo rcreation will be enfeebled and discouraged. A religion, for example,which is intended to be transformed into historical knowledgeunder the hegemony of pure historical justice, a religion which isintended to be understood through and through as an object ofscience and learning, will when this process is at an end also befo und to have been destroyed. The reason is that historical verificationalways brings to light so much that is false, crude, inhuman,absurd, violent that the mood of pious illusion in which alone anythingthat wants to live can live necessarily crumbles away: fo r it isonly in love, only when shaded by the illusion produced by love, thatis to say in the unconditional faith in right and perfection, that man iscreative. Anything that constrains a man to love less than unconditionallyhas severed the roots of his strength: he will wither away,that is to say become dishonest. In producing this effect, history isthe antithesis of art: and only if history can endure to be transformedinto a work of art will it perhaps be able to preserve instincts or even95

Untimely Meditationsevoke them. Such a historiography would, however, b e altogethercontrary to the analytical and inartistic tendencies of our time, whichwould indeed declare it false. But a history which, lacking the directionof an inner drive to construct, does nothing but destroy, in the longrun denaturizes its instruments: for such men destroy illusions and'he who destroys the illusions in himself and others is punished bynature, the cruellest tyrant'. For a good length of time, it is true, onecan occupy oneself with history in a perfectly innocent and harmlessway, as though it were merely an occupation like any other; recenttheology especially seems to have entered into partnership with historyout of pure innocence, and even now it almost refuses to seethat, probably much against its will, it has thereby placed itself in theservice of the Voltairean ecrasez. * No one should suppose that thisdevelopment conceals a powerful new constructive instinct- unless,that is, one is to regard the so-called Protestant Uriiont as the work ofa new religion, and perhaps the jurist Holtzendorf (the editor andprefacer of the even more problematical Protestant Bible) as Johnthe Baptist at the river Jordan. For som,e time yet the Hegelianphilosophy still smouldering in older heads may assist in propagatingthis innocence, perhaps by teaching one how to distinguish the ' ideaof Christianity' from its manifold imperfect 'phenomenal forms'and even to convince oneself that it is the 'preferred tendency of theidea' to reveal itself in ever purer forms, and at last in its purest, mosttransparent, indeed hardly visible form, in the brains of the contemporarytheologus liberalis vulgaris. But when he hears these purestof-the-pureChristians speaking of earlier impure Christians theimpartial auditor often has the impression that what is being spokenof is not Christianity at all but - well, what are we to think? When wefind the greatest theologian of the century':!: characterizing Christianityas the religion which can 'discover itself in all existing and inseveral other barely possible religions', and when the 'true church' issupposed to be that which 'becomes a flowing mass, where there areno contours, where every part is now here, now there, and everythingblends peacefully together' - again, what are we to think?What one can learn in the case of Christianitythat under theinfluence of a historical treatment it has become denaturized, until a'*'Voltairean ecrasez.': alludes to Voltaire's motto 'ecrasez l'i nfame!' - destroy theinfamous thing (i.e. the Church).tProtestant Union: the military alliance formed between 1608 and 1621 by theProtestant princes of Germany.:j:'greatest theologian of the century': Schleiermacher (see glossary).96

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>evoke <strong>the</strong>m. Such a historiography would, however, b e altoge<strong>the</strong>rcontrary to <strong>the</strong> analytical and <strong>in</strong>artistic tendencies <strong>of</strong> our time, whichwould <strong>in</strong>deed declare it false. But a history which, lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> direction<strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ner drive to construct, does noth<strong>in</strong>g but destroy, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> longrun denaturizes its <strong>in</strong>struments: for such men destroy illusions and'he who destroys <strong>the</strong> illusions <strong>in</strong> himself and o<strong>the</strong>rs is punished bynature, <strong>the</strong> cruellest tyrant'. For a good length <strong>of</strong> time, it is true, onecan occupy oneself with history <strong>in</strong> a perfectly <strong>in</strong>nocent and harmlessway, as though it were merely an occupation like any o<strong>the</strong>r; recent<strong>the</strong>ology especially seems to have entered <strong>in</strong>to partnership with historyout <strong>of</strong> pure <strong>in</strong>nocence, and even now it almost refuses to seethat, probably much aga<strong>in</strong>st its will, it has <strong>the</strong>reby placed itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>service <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Voltairean ecrasez. * No one should suppose that thisdevelopment conceals a powerful new constructive <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ct- unless,that is, one is to regard <strong>the</strong> so-called Protestant Uriiont as <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong>a new religion, and perhaps <strong>the</strong> jurist Holtzendorf (<strong>the</strong> editor andprefacer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> even more problematical Protestant Bible) as John<strong>the</strong> Baptist at <strong>the</strong> river Jordan. For som,e time yet <strong>the</strong> Hegelianphilosophy still smoulder<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> older heads may assist <strong>in</strong> propagat<strong>in</strong>gthis <strong>in</strong>nocence, perhaps by teach<strong>in</strong>g one how to dist<strong>in</strong>guish <strong>the</strong> ' idea<strong>of</strong> Christianity' from its manifold imperfect 'phenomenal forms'and even to conv<strong>in</strong>ce oneself that it is <strong>the</strong> 'preferred tendency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>idea' to reveal itself <strong>in</strong> ever purer forms, and at last <strong>in</strong> its purest, mosttransparent, <strong>in</strong>deed hardly visible form, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contemporary<strong>the</strong>ologus liberalis vulgaris. But when he hears <strong>the</strong>se purest<strong>of</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-pureChristians speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> earlier impure Christians <strong>the</strong>impartial auditor <strong>of</strong>ten has <strong>the</strong> impression that what is be<strong>in</strong>g spoken<strong>of</strong> is not Christianity at all but - well, what are we to th<strong>in</strong>k? When wef<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> greatest <strong>the</strong>ologian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century':!: characteriz<strong>in</strong>g Christianityas <strong>the</strong> religion which can 'discover itself <strong>in</strong> all exist<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>several o<strong>the</strong>r barely possible religions', and when <strong>the</strong> 'true church' issupposed to be that which 'becomes a flow<strong>in</strong>g mass, where <strong>the</strong>re areno contours, where every part is now here, now <strong>the</strong>re, and everyth<strong>in</strong>gblends peacefully toge<strong>the</strong>r' - aga<strong>in</strong>, what are we to th<strong>in</strong>k?What one can learn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Christianitythat under <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> a historical treatment it has become denaturized, until a'*'Voltairean ecrasez.': alludes to Voltaire's motto 'ecrasez l'i nfame!' - destroy <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>famous th<strong>in</strong>g (i.e. <strong>the</strong> Church).tProtestant Union: <strong>the</strong> military alliance formed between 1608 and 1621 by <strong>the</strong>Protestant pr<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>of</strong> Germany.:j:'greatest <strong>the</strong>ologian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century': Schleiermacher (see glossary).96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!