10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>to sound <strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>dred notes on <strong>the</strong> str<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> his lyre: h e has become apassive sound<strong>in</strong>g-board whose reflected tones act upon o<strong>the</strong>rsimilar sound<strong>in</strong>g-boards: until at last <strong>the</strong> whole air <strong>of</strong> an age is filledwith <strong>the</strong> confused humm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se tender and k<strong>in</strong>dred echoes. Yetit seems to me as though only <strong>the</strong> harmonics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al historicalnote are audible: <strong>the</strong> solidity and power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al can no longerbe div<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shrill and bubble-th<strong>in</strong> vibrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se str<strong>in</strong>gs.The orig<strong>in</strong>al note recalled actions, distress, terrors; this note lulls usand makes <strong>of</strong> us tame spectators; it is as though <strong>the</strong> 'Eroica'Symphony had been arranged for two flutes for <strong>the</strong> enterta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>of</strong>drowsy opium-smokers. Through this we are already <strong>in</strong> a position toassess how <strong>the</strong>se virtuosi will stand <strong>in</strong> regard to modern man's supremeclaim to a higher and purer sense <strong>of</strong> justice; this virtue neverhas anyth<strong>in</strong>g pleas<strong>in</strong>g about it, knows no delicious tremors, is harshand dread-<strong>in</strong>spir<strong>in</strong>g. In comparison, how low even magnanimitystands <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> virtues, and magnanimity is itself possessedby only a few rare historians! Many more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m atta<strong>in</strong> only totolerance, to allow<strong>in</strong>g validity to what tj1ey cannot deny happened,to expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g away and extenuat<strong>in</strong>g, on <strong>the</strong> correct assumption that<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>experienced will <strong>in</strong>terpret <strong>the</strong> mere absence <strong>of</strong> abrasivenessand harsh condemnation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past as evidence <strong>of</strong> a just disposition.But only superior strength can judge, weakness is obliged to tolerateif it is not to make a hypocritical pretence <strong>of</strong> strength and turn justicesitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> judgment <strong>in</strong>to an actor. There still rema<strong>in</strong>s a dreadfulspecies <strong>of</strong> historian, efficient, severe and honest <strong>of</strong> character butnarrow <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d; <strong>the</strong> will to be just is <strong>the</strong>re, as is <strong>the</strong> pathos attend<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> judge: but all <strong>the</strong>ir verdicts are false, for approximately<strong>the</strong> same reason as <strong>the</strong> verdicts <strong>of</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary court juries are false.How improbable it thus is that <strong>the</strong>re should be an abundance <strong>of</strong>talent for history! Qu ite apart from <strong>the</strong> disguised egoists and partymenwho employ an air <strong>of</strong> objectivity <strong>in</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>rance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir crookedgame. And quite apart also from those wholly thoughtless peoplewho when <strong>the</strong>y write history do so <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> naive belief that all <strong>the</strong>popular views <strong>of</strong> precisely <strong>the</strong>ir own age are <strong>the</strong> right and just viewsand that to write <strong>in</strong> accord with <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir age is <strong>the</strong> sameth<strong>in</strong>g as be<strong>in</strong>g just; a belief <strong>in</strong> which every religion dwells and aboutwhich <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> religions no fur<strong>the</strong>r comment is needed. Thesenaive historians call <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions and deeds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>past accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> everyday standards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present moment'objectivity': it is here <strong>the</strong>y discover <strong>the</strong> canon <strong>of</strong> all truth; <strong>the</strong>ir task isto adapt <strong>the</strong> past to contemporary triviality. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>y90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!