10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>I:flesh-and-blood compendia and as it were abstractions made concrete.If <strong>the</strong>y possess a character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own it is buried so deep itcannot get out <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> day: if <strong>the</strong>y are human be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>the</strong>y areso only to him 'who explores <strong>the</strong> depths'. To anyone else <strong>the</strong>y aresometh<strong>in</strong>g different, not men, not gods, not animals, but creations<strong>of</strong> historical culture, wholly structure, image, form withoutdemonstrable content and, unhappily, ill-designed form and, whatis more, uniform. And so let my proposition be understood andpondered: history can be borne only by strong personalities, weak ones areutterly ext<strong>in</strong>guished by it. The reason is that history confuses <strong>the</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gsand sensibility when <strong>the</strong>se are not strong enough to assess <strong>the</strong> pastby <strong>the</strong>mselves. He who no longer dares to trust himself but <strong>in</strong>voluntarilyasks <strong>of</strong> history 'How ought I to feel about this?' f<strong>in</strong>ds that histimidity gradually turns him <strong>in</strong>to an actor and that he is play<strong>in</strong>g arole, usually <strong>in</strong>deed many roles and <strong>the</strong>refore play<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m badlyand superficially. Gradually all congruity between <strong>the</strong> man and hishistorical doma<strong>in</strong> is lost; we behold pert little fellows associat<strong>in</strong>gwith <strong>the</strong> Romans as though <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong>fr equals: and <strong>the</strong>y root andburrow <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greek poets as though <strong>the</strong>se too werecorpora for <strong>the</strong>ir dissection and were as vilia as <strong>the</strong>ir own literary corporamay be. * Suppose one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is engaged with Democritus, I always 'feel like ask<strong>in</strong>g: why not Heraclitus? Or Philo? Or Bacon? OrDescartes?or anyone else. And <strong>the</strong>n: why does it have to be aphilosopher? Why not a poet or an orator? And: why a Greek at all,why not an Englishman or a Turk? Is <strong>the</strong> past not big enough for youto be able to f<strong>in</strong>d noth<strong>in</strong>g except th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> comparison with whichyou cut so ludicrous a figure? But, as I have said, this is a race <strong>of</strong>eunuchs, and to a eunuch one woman is like ano<strong>the</strong>r, simply awoman, woman <strong>in</strong> herself, <strong>the</strong> eternally unapproachableand it isthus a matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>difference what <strong>the</strong>y do so long as history itself iskept nice and 'objective', bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that those who want tokeep it so are for ever <strong>in</strong>capable <strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g history <strong>the</strong>mselves. Ands<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> eternally womanly will never draw you upward, you draw itdown to you and, be<strong>in</strong>g neuters, take history too for a neuter. t Butso that it shall not be thought that I am seriously compar<strong>in</strong>g history*vilia corpora : vile bodiest Alludes to <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> Goe<strong>the</strong>'s Faust II: 'Das Ewig-Weibliche/Zieht unsh<strong>in</strong>an'. <strong>Nietzsche</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten alludes to <strong>the</strong> phrase, always <strong>in</strong> an ironic-humorous tone: hefait('d, I th<strong>in</strong>k, to discover any mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> it.86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!