10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On <strong>the</strong> uses and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> history for lifeGermans are, after all, celebrated for <strong>the</strong>ir pr<strong>of</strong>ound <strong>in</strong>wardness.But this <strong>in</strong>wardness also carries with it a celebrated danger: <strong>the</strong>content itself, <strong>of</strong> which it is assumed that it cannot be seen fromwithout, may occasionally evaporate; from without, however,nei<strong>the</strong>r its former presence nor its disappearance will be apparent atall. But however far from this danger we may imag<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> Germanpeople to be, <strong>the</strong> foreigner will still be to some extent justified <strong>in</strong>ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that our <strong>in</strong>terior is too feeble and disorganized toproduce an outward effect and endow itself with a form. The <strong>in</strong>terior<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Germans can be receptive to an exceptional degree:serious, powerful, pr<strong>of</strong>ound, and perhaps even richer than that <strong>of</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r nations; but as a whole it rema<strong>in</strong>s weak because all <strong>the</strong>sebeautiful threads are not wound toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>to a powerful knot: sothat <strong>the</strong> visible act is not <strong>the</strong> act and self-revelation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> totality<strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>terior but only a feeble or crude attempt on <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong>one or o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se threads to pose as be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> whole. That iswhy <strong>the</strong> German cannot be judged by his actions and why as an<strong>in</strong>dividual he is still completely hidden even after he has acted. Asis well known, he has to be assessed accord<strong>in</strong>g to his thoughts andfeel<strong>in</strong>gs, and <strong>the</strong>se he nowadays expresses <strong>in</strong> his books. If only itwere not precisely <strong>the</strong>se books which, now more than ever before,lead us to doubt whe<strong>the</strong>r that celebrated <strong>in</strong>wardness really doesstill reside <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>accessible little temple; it is a dreadful thoughtthat one day <strong>the</strong>y might disappear and all that would be left to signalize"<strong>the</strong> German would be his arrogantly clumsy and meeklyslovenly exterior: almost as dreadful as if that hidden <strong>in</strong>wardnesswere sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>re falsified and pa<strong>in</strong>ted over and had becomean actor if not someth<strong>in</strong>g worse. This, at any rate, is whatGrillparzer, as an <strong>in</strong>dependent observer, seems to have ga<strong>the</strong>redfrom his experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre. 'We feel <strong>in</strong> abstractions', hesays, 'we hardly know any longer how feel<strong>in</strong>g really expresses itselfwith our contemporaries; we show <strong>the</strong>m perform<strong>in</strong>g actions suchas <strong>the</strong>y no longer perform nowadays. Shakespeare has ru<strong>in</strong>ed all<strong>of</strong> us moderns.'This is a s<strong>in</strong>gle case and perhaps it has been generalized too hastily:but how fearful it would be if such a generalization were justified, if ahost <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual cases should crowd <strong>in</strong> upon <strong>the</strong> observer; howdesolat<strong>in</strong>g it would be to have to say: we Germans feel <strong>in</strong> abstractions,we have all been ru<strong>in</strong>ed by history - a proposition whichwould destroy at its roots all hope <strong>of</strong> a future national culture: for81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!