Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997) Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

10.07.2015 Views

On the uses and disadvantages of history for lifoAnyone observing this has only one wish, that such a culture shouldnot perish of indigestion. Imagine, for example, a Greek observingsuch a culture: he would perceive that for modern man 'educated'and 'historically educated' seem so to belong together as to meanone and the same thing and to differ only verbally. If h€ then saidthat one can be very educated and yet at the same time altogetheruneducated historically, modern men would think they had failed tohear him aright and would shake their heads. That celebrated littlenation of a not so distant past - I mean these same Greeks duringthe period of their greatest strength kept a tenacious hold on theirunhistorical sense; if a present-day man were magically transportedback to that world he would probably consider the Greeks very'uncultured' - whereby, to be sure, the secret of modern culture, soscrupulously hidden, would be exposed to public ridicule: for wemoderns have nothing whatever of our own; only by replenishingand cramming ourselves with the ages, customs, arts, philosophies,religions, discoveries of others do we become anything worthy ofnotice, that is to say, walking encyclopaedias, which is what anancient Greek transported into our own time would perhaps take usfor. With encyclopaedias, however, all the value lies in what is containedwithin, in the content, not in what stands without, the bindingand cover; so it is that the whole of modern culture is essentiallyinward: on the outside the bookbinder has printed some such thingas 'Handbook of inward culture for outward barbarians' . Thisantithesis of inner and outer, indeed, makes the exterior even morebarbaric than it would be if a rude nation were only to develop out ofitself in accordance with its own uncouth needs. For what means areavailable to nature for overcoming that which presses upon it in toogreat abundance? One alone: to embrace it as lightly as possible soas quickly to expel it again and have done with it. From this comes ahabit of no longer taking real things seriously, from this arises the'weak personality' by virtue of which the real and existent makesonly a slight impression; one becomes ever more negligent of one'souter appearance and, provided the memory is continuallystimulated by a stream of new things worth knowing which can bestored tidily away in its coffers, one finally widens the dubious gulfbetween content and form to the point of complete insensibility tobarbarism. The culture of a people as the antithesis to this barbarismwas once, and as I think with a certain justice, defined as unity ofartistic style in all the expressions of the life of a people; this definitionshould not be misunderstood in the sense of implying an79

Untimely Meditationsl.11}!lI·,:":,\ 'i!: ;antithesis between barbarism and fine style; what is' meant is that apeople to whom one attributes a culture has to be in all reality asingle living unity and not fall wretchedly apart into inner and outer,content and form. He who wants to strive fo r and promote the cultureof a people should strive for and promote this higher unity andjoin in the destruction of modern bogus cultivated ness fo r the sakeof a true culture; he should venture to reflect how the health of a peopleundermined by the study of history may be again restored, how itmay rediscover its instincts and therewith its honesty.I may as well speak directly of ourselves, we Germans of the presentday who are more afflicted than other nations by that weakness ofpersonality and that contradiction between form and content. Formgenerally counts with us as a convention, as a vestment and disguise,and it is therefore, if not exactly hated, at any rate not loved; it wouldbe even more correct to say that we have an extraordinary fear of theword 'convention' and, no doubt, also of the thing. It was this fearwhich led the German to desert the school of France: he wanted tobecome more natural and thereby mOJie German. But this 'thereby'seems to have been a miscalculation: escaped from the school ofconvention, he then let himself go in whatever manner his fancyhappened to suggest to him, and at bottom did no more than imitatein a slovenly and half-forgetful way what he had formerly imitatedwith scrupulous care and often with success. So it is that, comparedwith past ages, we dwell even today in a carelessly inaccurate copy ofFrench convention: a fact to which all our comings and goings, conversations,clothing and habitations bear witness. We thought wewere retreating into naturalness, but what we were really doing wasletting ourselves go and electing fo r ease and comfort and thesmallest possible degree of self-discipline. Take a stroll through aGerman city - compared with the distinct national qualities displayedin fo reign cities, all the conventions here are negative ones,everything is colourless, worn out, badly copied, negligent,everyone does as he likes but what he likes is never fo rceful and wellconsidered but follows the rules laid down first by universal haste,then by the universal rage for ease and comfort. A garment whichcosts no intelligence to design and no time to put on, that is to say agarment borrowed from abroad and imitated in the most easygoingway possible, at once counts with the Germans as a contribution toGerman national dress. The sense of form is rejected without theslightest misgiving - for we possess the sense of the content: for the80

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>l.11}!lI·,:":,\ 'i!: ;anti<strong>the</strong>sis between barbarism and f<strong>in</strong>e style; what is' meant is that apeople to whom one attributes a culture has to be <strong>in</strong> all reality as<strong>in</strong>gle liv<strong>in</strong>g unity and not fall wretchedly apart <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>ner and outer,content and form. He who wants to strive fo r and promote <strong>the</strong> culture<strong>of</strong> a people should strive for and promote this higher unity andjo<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> modern bogus cultivated ness fo r <strong>the</strong> sake<strong>of</strong> a true culture; he should venture to reflect how <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> a peopleunderm<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> history may be aga<strong>in</strong> restored, how itmay rediscover its <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>cts and <strong>the</strong>rewith its honesty.I may as well speak directly <strong>of</strong> ourselves, we Germans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> presentday who are more afflicted than o<strong>the</strong>r nations by that weakness <strong>of</strong>personality and that contradiction between form and content. Formgenerally counts with us as a convention, as a vestment and disguise,and it is <strong>the</strong>refore, if not exactly hated, at any rate not loved; it wouldbe even more correct to say that we have an extraord<strong>in</strong>ary fear <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>word 'convention' and, no doubt, also <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>g. It was this fearwhich led <strong>the</strong> German to desert <strong>the</strong> school <strong>of</strong> France: he wanted tobecome more natural and <strong>the</strong>reby mOJie German. But this '<strong>the</strong>reby'seems to have been a miscalculation: escaped from <strong>the</strong> school <strong>of</strong>convention, he <strong>the</strong>n let himself go <strong>in</strong> whatever manner his fancyhappened to suggest to him, and at bottom did no more than imitate<strong>in</strong> a slovenly and half-forgetful way what he had formerly imitatedwith scrupulous care and <strong>of</strong>ten with success. So it is that, comparedwith past ages, we dwell even today <strong>in</strong> a carelessly <strong>in</strong>accurate copy <strong>of</strong>French convention: a fact to which all our com<strong>in</strong>gs and go<strong>in</strong>gs, conversations,cloth<strong>in</strong>g and habitations bear witness. We thought wewere retreat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to naturalness, but what we were really do<strong>in</strong>g waslett<strong>in</strong>g ourselves go and elect<strong>in</strong>g fo r ease and comfort and <strong>the</strong>smallest possible degree <strong>of</strong> self-discipl<strong>in</strong>e. Take a stroll through aGerman city - compared with <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ct national qualities displayed<strong>in</strong> fo reign cities, all <strong>the</strong> conventions here are negative ones,everyth<strong>in</strong>g is colourless, worn out, badly copied, negligent,everyone does as he likes but what he likes is never fo rceful and wellconsidered but follows <strong>the</strong> rules laid down first by universal haste,<strong>the</strong>n by <strong>the</strong> universal rage for ease and comfort. A garment whichcosts no <strong>in</strong>telligence to design and no time to put on, that is to say agarment borrowed from abroad and imitated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most easygo<strong>in</strong>gway possible, at once counts with <strong>the</strong> Germans as a contribution toGerman national dress. The sense <strong>of</strong> form is rejected without <strong>the</strong>slightest misgiv<strong>in</strong>g - for we possess <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> content: for <strong>the</strong>80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!