10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>But our question can also be answered differently. ' Aga<strong>in</strong> with aNo - but with a No for a different reason: with <strong>the</strong> No <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> suprahistoricalman, who sees no salvation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process and for whom,ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> world is complete and reaches its f<strong>in</strong>ality at each andevery moment. What could ten more years teach that <strong>the</strong> past tenwere unable to teach!Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> this teach<strong>in</strong>g is happ<strong>in</strong>ess or resignation orvirtue or atonement, suprahistorical men have never been able toagree; but, <strong>in</strong> opposition to all historical modes <strong>of</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>past, <strong>the</strong>y are unanimous <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposition: <strong>the</strong> past and <strong>the</strong> presentare one, that is to say, with all <strong>the</strong>ir diversity identical <strong>in</strong> all that istypical and, as <strong>the</strong> omnipresence <strong>of</strong>imperishable types, a motionlessstructure <strong>of</strong> a value that cannot alter and a significance that is always<strong>the</strong> same. Just as <strong>the</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> different languages correspond to<strong>the</strong> same typically unchang<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> man, so that he whounderstood <strong>the</strong>se needs would be unable to learn anyth<strong>in</strong>g newfrom any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se languages, so <strong>the</strong> suprahistorical th<strong>in</strong>ker beholds<strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> nations and <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualfrom with<strong>in</strong>, clairvoyantlydiv<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various hieroglyphics andgradually even com<strong>in</strong>g wearily to avoid <strong>the</strong> endless stream <strong>of</strong> newsigns: for how should <strong>the</strong> unend<strong>in</strong>g superfluity <strong>of</strong> events not reducehim to satiety, over-satiety and f<strong>in</strong>ally to nausea! So that perhaps <strong>the</strong>boldest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is at last ready to say to his heart, with GiacomoLeopardi:Noth<strong>in</strong>g lives that is wonhyThy agitation, and <strong>the</strong> earth deserves not a sigh.Our be<strong>in</strong>g is pa<strong>in</strong> and boredom and <strong>the</strong> world is d<strong>in</strong> - noth<strong>in</strong>g more.Be calm.But let us leave <strong>the</strong> suprahistorical men to <strong>the</strong>ir nausea and <strong>the</strong>irwisdom: today let us rejoice for once <strong>in</strong> our unwisdom and, asbelievers <strong>in</strong> deeds and progress and as honourers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process, giveourselves a holiday. Our valuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historical may be only anoccidental prejudice: but let us at least make progress with<strong>in</strong> thisprejudice and not stand still! Let us at least learn better how toemploy history for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> life! Then we will gladly acknowledgethat <strong>the</strong> suprahistorical outlook possesses more wisdom thanwe do, provided we can only be sure that we possess more life: for<strong>the</strong>n our unwisdom will at any rate have more future than <strong>the</strong>ir wisdomwill. And <strong>in</strong> order to leave no doubt as to <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> thisanti<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> life and wisdom, I shall employ an ancient, tried-andtestedprocedure and straightway propound a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ses.66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!