10.07.2015 Views

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

Friedrich_Nietzsche - Untimely_Meditations_(Cambridge_Texts_in_the_History_of_Philosophy__1997)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<strong>Untimely</strong> <strong>Meditations</strong>and affected vivacity which have so excited some readers <strong>the</strong>y cannow mention Strauss only <strong>in</strong> concert with Less<strong>in</strong>g, can be found onpage 8: 'I am well aware that what 1 propose to discuss <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>gpages is known just as well by countless o<strong>the</strong>r people and by some itis known better. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m have already spoken out. Should 1<strong>the</strong>refore keep silent? 1 do not believe so. For we all supplement oneano<strong>the</strong>r. If ano<strong>the</strong>r knows many th<strong>in</strong>gs better than I, perhaps 1 knowa few th<strong>in</strong>gs better than he; and 1 have a viewpo<strong>in</strong>t on many th<strong>in</strong>gsdifferent from <strong>the</strong> viewpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. So out with it, let me displaymy colours, that it may be seen whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>y are genu<strong>in</strong>e.' Tobe sure, Strauss's style usually ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a mean between this freeand-easyquick-march and <strong>the</strong> fu nereal crawl <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first example:but between two vices <strong>the</strong>re does not always dwell virtue; all too<strong>of</strong>ten what dwells <strong>the</strong>re is weakness, lameness and impotence. 1 wasvery disappo<strong>in</strong>ted, <strong>in</strong> fact, when 1 looked through Strauss's book <strong>in</strong>search <strong>of</strong> more subtle and wittier traits and expressions; s<strong>in</strong>ce 1 hadfound noth<strong>in</strong>g praiseworthy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> confessor 1 actually established ahead<strong>in</strong>g under which to list such passages,eso that 1 might at least beable to say someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> praise <strong>of</strong> Strauss <strong>the</strong> writer. 1 searched andsearched but could list noth<strong>in</strong>g. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a second listwith <strong>the</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g 'Solecisms, confused similes, obscure abbreviations,tastelessness and affectation' became so full 1 can venture toreproduce here only a modest selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> examples 1assembled. Perhaps it will reveal precisely what it is that evokes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>contemporary German his belief that Strauss is a great stylist: forhere we f<strong>in</strong>d curiosities <strong>of</strong> expression which <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> arid dust anddesert <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book as a whole <strong>of</strong>fer if not pleasant at any rate pa<strong>in</strong>fullystimulat<strong>in</strong>g surprises: on encounter<strong>in</strong>g such passages we notice, toemploy a Straussian metaphor, that at least we are not yet dead by<strong>the</strong> way we react to <strong>the</strong>se jabs. For <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book displays a totallack <strong>of</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g whatever <strong>of</strong>fensive, that is to say productive, such aswould now be reckoned a positive quality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> classic prose-writer.Extreme sobriety and aridity, a truly starv<strong>in</strong>g sobriety, nowadaysawakens <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> educated masses <strong>the</strong> unnatural feel<strong>in</strong>g that precisely<strong>the</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> signs <strong>of</strong> flourish<strong>in</strong>g health, so that here <strong>the</strong>re apply <strong>the</strong>words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dialogus de Oratibus: 'illam ipsam quam iactantsanitatem non firmitate sed ieiunio consequuntur' . * With <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctiveunanimity, <strong>the</strong>y hate allfirmitas because it bears witness to a health<strong>in</strong>essquite different from <strong>the</strong>irs, and seek to throw suspicion on*illam ipsam quam iactant sanitatem non firmitate sed ieiunio consequuntur: even <strong>the</strong>irhealth, which <strong>the</strong>y parade, <strong>the</strong>y obta<strong>in</strong> not through strength but through fast<strong>in</strong>g(Tacitus)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!