<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group – <strong>Visual</strong> <strong>Psychophysics</strong> / <strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Optics</strong>Support: NIH grant P41-EB015903, NSF grant CBET-0853773 ,Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH UL1-RR025758), American Society for Laser Medicine and SurgeryProgram Number: 4271 Poster Board Number: B0308Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMEffect of Temperature on Lens Power, Anterior and PosteriorSurface Lens Curvatures and Force during SimulatedAccommodation in Cynomolgus MonkeysJean-Marie A. Parel 1, 3 , Bianca M. Maceo 1, 2 , Cornelis J. Rowaan 1 ,Fabrice Manns 1, 2 , Esdras Arrieta 1 . 1 Ophthalmic Biophysics Center,Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ. of Miami Miller School ofMedicine, Miami, FL; 2 Biomedical <strong>Optics</strong> and Laser Laboratory,Dept of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universityof Miami, Miami, FL; 3 Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney,NSW, Australia.Purpose: To determine whether temperature has an effect on theaccommodative response of primate lenses during simulatedaccommodation in a lens stretcher.Methods: Lens shape was measured during ex vivo simulatedaccommodation on 4 cynomolgus monkey (4.5-6.9 years) lenses from4 donors (PMT 9.5+/-11 hours). Tissue samples were mounted in theEVASII lens stretching system (Ehrmann et al, Clin Exp Opt, 2008)and stretched in a step-wise fashion (0.25mm/step up to 2.5mmradially). In EVAS II, the tissue is immersed in preservation medium(DMEM) throughout the experiment. A temperature controller withthermocouple feedback was used to control the temperature of themedium. For each lens, a stretching experiment was first performedat 24°C (room temperature). At the end of the experiment, thetemperature of the medium was increased to 35°C (oculartemperature). A second stretching experiment was then performed.The power, anterior and posterior curvatures, and thickness of thelens, and the force exerted to stretch the lens were measured at eachstep at both temperatures. The change in lens power, thickness, radiusand the maximum force produced at the two temperatures werecompared.Results: At 25°C, the average+/-SD of the change was 19.5+/-2.1Dfor lens power, 0.58+/-0.09mm for lens thickness, -2.54+/-0.74 forlens anterior radius; -0.94+/-0.12mm for lens posterior radius. Themaximum force was 1.50+/-0.22g. At 35°C, the average+/-SD of thechange was 18.1+/-2.7D for lens power, 0.57+/-0.09mm for lensthickness, -2.46+/-0.86mm for lens anterior radius; -0.91+/-0.29mmfor lens posterior radius. The maximum force was 1.30+/-0.26g.Conclusions: Within the range of temperatures tested in this study(25-35°C), temperature does not have significant effect on thechanges in lens shape, power and force during simulatedaccommodation in a lens stretcher.Commercial Relationships: Jean-Marie A. Parel, CROMA (F),InnFocus (F), Abeamed (F), University of Miami (P); Bianca M.Maceo, None; Cornelis J. Rowaan, None; Fabrice Manns, None;Esdras Arrieta, NoneSupport: NIH Grant R01EY14225, R01EY021834, F31EY021444(NRSA Individual Predoctoral Fellowship [BM]), and Center GrantP30EY14801; Australian Government CRC Scheme (Vision CRC);FloridaLions Eye Bank; an unrestricted grant from Research toPrevent Blindness; Henri and Flore LesieurFoundation (JMP)Program Number: 4272 Poster Board Number: B0309Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMLens Spherical Aberration Changes in Cynomolgus Monkeysduring Simulated Accommodation in a Lens StretcherBianca M. Maceo 1, 2 , Fabrice Manns 1, 2 , Alberto de Castro 3 , StephenUhlhorn 1 , Esdras Arrieta 1 , Susana Marcos 3 , Jean-Marie A. Parel 1, 4 .1 Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,Miami, FL; 2 Biomedical <strong>Optics</strong> and Laser Laboratory, Department ofBiomedical Engineering, University of Miami College ofEngineering, Coral Gables, FL; 3 Instituto de Óptica, ConsejoSuperior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain; 4 VisionCooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Purpose: To quantify the difference in spherical aberration (SA) ofcynomolgus monkey lenses in the accommodated andunaccommodated state.Methods: A Laser Ray Tracing system (LRT) was used to obtain SAmeasurements on 2 cynomolgus monkey lenses from 2 donors (4.5and 6.9 years, PMT= 4 and 26 hours). The tissue was mounted in achamber filled with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium inside a lensstretcher (Ehrmann et al, Clin Exp Opt, 2008). The lens sphericalaberration was measured in the unstretched (accommodated) andstretched (relaxed) state. The LRT delivered 51 equally-spacedparallel rays along the vertical meridian of the lens over a total lengthof 6mm. A camera mounted on a vertical position stage was placedunder the chamber containing the lens to sequentially record the spotcorresponding to each individual ray. Spot images were measured atup 12 camera positions along the optical axis covering a range of upto 22mm. The images were processed to determine the centroid ofeach spot and calculate the corresponding ray height at each cameraposition. For each camera position, the measured ray heights wereplotted as a function of entrance ray height and fit with a 3rd orderpolynomial: y = A*x + B*x 3 . The A and B coefficients were thenplotted as a function of camera position and a linear fit wasperformed. The effective focal length and Seidel spherical aberrationcoefficient were extracted from the fits. A ray-trace analysis showedthat the posterior window of the chamber contributes less than 1%error to the SA coefficient. Therefore the contribution of the windowto spherical aberration was not corrected for.Results: The results for the two lenses are summarized in the tablebelow:Conclusions: Spherical aberration in cynomolgus monkey lensesincreases in absolute value with accommodation, as found in humanand rhesus monkeys.Commercial Relationships: Bianca M. Maceo, None; FabriceManns, None; Alberto de Castro, None; Stephen Uhlhorn, None;Esdras Arrieta, None; Susana Marcos, Essilor (F),PCT/ES2012/070185 (P); Jean-Marie A. Parel, CROMA (F),InnFocus (F), Abeamed (F), University of Miami (P)Support: NIH Grant R01EY14225, R01EY021834, F31EY021444(NRSA Individual Predoctoral Fellowship [BM]), and Center GrantP30EY14801; Australian Government CRC Scheme (Vision CRC);Florida Lions Eye Bank; an unrestricted grant from Research toPrevent Blindness; Henri and Flore Lesieur Foundation (JMP),Spanish Government FIS2011-25637, European Research CouncilERC-2011-AdG-294099; CSIC I3P Program.Program Number: 4273 Poster Board Number: B0310Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMComparison between in vivo and in vitro age-related loss ofaccommodation in rhesus monkeysMark Wendt, Adrian Glasser. College of Optometry, University ofHouston, Houston, TX.©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group – <strong>Visual</strong> <strong>Psychophysics</strong> / <strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Optics</strong>Purpose: The progressive age related loss of accommodation inrhesus monkeys has been studied in vivo or with in vitro mechanicalstretching to simulate disaccommodative changes in enucleated eyes(in vitro accommodation). No prior study had directly compared thetwo approaches with the same eyes. Here a direct comparison is madebetween the age-related in vivo loss of accommodation in rhesusmonkeys and in vitro mechanical stretching induceddisaccommodative changes in the same eyes after enucleation.Methods: Experiments were performed on 10 iridectomizedmonkeys aged between 10 and 25 years. Accommodation wasstimulated with intravenous (i.v.) pilocarpine and refraction measuredstatically with a Hartinger coincidence refractometer and dynamicallywith infrared photorefraction. In one subsequent i.v. pilocarpineexperiment with each monkey, accommodative changes in lensdiameter were measured dynamically. Following euthanasia one eyeeach from nine of the monkeys was dissected and stretched radiallystep-wise while measuring changes in lens focal length and diameterto attempt to achieve the largest changes possible.Results: In vivo accommodative amplitudes decreased linearly withage from 12.38 D to 3.38 D (n = 10; r 2 = 0.9097; p < 0.0001) andaccommodative decrease in lens diameter decreased linearly with agefrom 0.703 mm to 0.327 mm (n = 9; r 2 = 0.8097; p = 0.0009). In vitroaccommodative change in lens power decreased linearly with agefrom 16.9 D to 6.16 D (n = 9; r 2 = 0.8805; p = 0.0001) and in vitroaccommodative change in lens diameter decreased linearly with agefrom 1.43 mm to 0.73 mm (n = 9; r 2 = 0.62; p < 0.0009). In vitroaccommodation with the maximum radial stretch overestimated invivo accommodation on average by 2.94 ±1.604 D without opticalcompensation for ocular optical effects. In vitro accommodativechanges in lens diameter with the maximum radial stretchoverestimated the in vivo accommodative changes in lens diameter by0.65 ± 0.083 mm.Conclusions: Maximum change in power and diameter that lensesundergo with stretching overestimates the in vivo accommodativechanges in optical power and lens diameter. Both in vivo and in vitroaccommodation in the same eyes of rhesus monkeys show a similarprogressive age-related loss of accommodation. Since in vitroaccommodation does not rely on ciliary muscle function, thissupports a lenticular basis for presbyopia in rhesus monkeys.Commercial Relationships: Mark Wendt, None; Adrian Glasser,NoneSupport: NEI Core Grant P30 EY007551 to UHCOProgram Number: 4274 Poster Board Number: B0311Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMAge-related loss of accommodation in rhesus monkeys isassociated with an age-related increase in lens stiffnessAdrian Glasser, Mark Wendt. College of Optometry, University ofHouston, Houston, TX.Purpose: It is generally agreed that presbyopia in humans is causedby an age-related increase in lens stiffness. Rhesus monkeys developpresbyopia with a similar relative age-course as humans and are usedas an animal model for human presbyopia, although prior studieshave suggested differences in the aetiology of presbyopia betweenhumans and monkeys. Here, the age-related loss of accommodationfrom in vivo and in vitro experiments is correlated with the stiffnessof the same lenses to ascertain the relationship between presbyopiaand lens stiffness in rhesus monkeys.Methods: Experiments were performed on 10 iridectomized rhesusmonkeys aged between 10 and 25 years. Accommodation wasstimulated with intravenous pilocarpine and refraction measured witha Hartinger and infrared photorefraction and accommodative changesin lens diameter measured with slit-lamp videography. Aftereuthanasia, one eye each from nine monkeys was used formechanical stretching experiments in which changes in lens focallength and lens diameter were measured as a function of the appliedradial stretch. Lenses were then isolated and squeezed in six 100 µmsteps while measuring the applied force.Results: In vivo accommodative amplitudes decreased linearly withage (r 2 = 0.9097; p < 0.001) and accommodative change in lensdiameter decreased linearly with age (r 2 = 0.8097; p < 0.001). Withmechanical stretching the lens power and lens diameter curves foreach lens plateaued and the maximum changes in lens power anddiameter from all lenses decreased linearly with age (r 2 = 0.8805; p