18.11.2012 Views

irwin - Galerija Gregor Podnar.

irwin - Galerija Gregor Podnar.

irwin - Galerija Gregor Podnar.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IRWIN<br />

PORTFOLIO<br />

Lindenstr. 35 | 10969 Berlin | Germany | tel. +49 30 259 346 51 | fax +49 30 259 346 52 | berlin@gregorpodnar.com | www.gregorpodnar.com<br />

!


Introduction<br />

IRWIN works in a complex and subtle way with connections between art and ideology. Their work brings<br />

together art historical references, such as Romanticism, Modernism or the Suprematism of Malevich, with<br />

symbols taken from religion or totalitarian political systems, for example from the Nazi era or from Soviet<br />

social realism. IRWIN has over time built a complex system of cross-references between their works and the<br />

works of other artists.<br />

The starting point for IRWIN is that different symbols have different meanings depending on place and time.<br />

In order to examine and discover the meaning and the function of a symbol IRWIN starts work according to a<br />

method or process they have developed themselves, the retro principle. This method means that in order to<br />

understand the meaning and function of a symbol one needs to investigate its origin. A reconstruction of the<br />

meaning of the symbol implies that the meaning of the symbol is changed retrospectively through the fact<br />

that IRWIN juxtaposes and appropriates the symbols into new contexts. Thereby the symbols are given new<br />

connotations. In many works IRWIN manifests the visual and ideological similarities between seemingly<br />

different totalitarian systems, the history of art and of religion. Their work often embraces a warm humor and<br />

in many of their works there are often marked ambiguities.<br />

IRWIN together with NSK (the artist collective Neue Slowenische Kunst, founded in 1984, where the music<br />

group Laibach is a member) can also be said to work with the question of the importance of culture when it<br />

comes to the reconstruction of a nation. In this work IRWIN takes as their starting point the Slovenian culture<br />

and the Slovenian nation. A nation that has to take into account the fact that it is situated, geographically as<br />

well as culturally, between East and West, between Central Europe and the Slavic heritage. Collectively the<br />

works of IRWIN deals with the European history of ideas and its ideological foundations, a political and<br />

cultural heritage that has shaped Europe in the past and will shape Europe in the future.<br />

Martin Schibli, on the occasion of the IRWIN-exhibition «What is art» at Kalmar Konstmuseum, Sweden, 2009<br />

!


Red Districts<br />

Blood, coal, oil on canvas, wood, marble, aluminium, gold, iron, glass, 350 x 420 x 40 cm, 1987<br />

Collaborators: Janez Knez, Tugo Susnik<br />

(second of two variants)<br />

!


Laibach State<br />

Wood, serigraphy on canvas covered with wax, silver leaves on wood, acrylic, tar; (Inside: aluminum cross,<br />

oil color, poster, mirror). Approx. 110 x 80 x 20 cm, 1987 (Dušan Mandič)<br />

!


Nova Acropola<br />

Wood, fur, serigraphy on wax paper, oil, plaster, 86 x 86 x 5,5 cm, 1988 (Roman Uranjek)<br />

!


IRWIN Icons<br />

Exhibition view at Venice Biennal 2003, 1993 -2003<br />

!


Cup of coffee I (Replica)<br />

Mixed media, 72 x 62 cm, 2003 (Andrej Savski)<br />

Vade Retro<br />

Mixed media, 93 x 69 cm, 1988 (Roman Uranjek)<br />

!


Bride (marvée)<br />

Mixed media, 86 x 60 x 16 cm, 2004 (Dušan Mandič)<br />

Malevich between two wars<br />

Mixed media, 77 x 51 cm, 1984-2001 (Dušan Mandič)<br />

!


Deer (Icon)<br />

Mixed media, 110 x 80 cm, 2003 (Miran Mohar)<br />

Wheel of the Wheels<br />

Wheel, chair, 140 x 55 x 55 cm, ed. of 4, 2000<br />

(Borut Vogelnik)<br />

!


Black Square on Red Square<br />

DVD, 3 min 15, Based on the action by Irwin and Michael Benson (footage of the Moscow TV and Kinteticon<br />

Pictures), edited by Igor Zupe, ed. of 3, 1992-1997<br />

On June 6, 1992 between 2 pm and 3 pm, the group Irwin and Michael Benson performed an artistic action<br />

Black Square on Red Square in collaboration with N. Abalakova (Tot-Art), D. Ariupin, M. Breznik, S. Bugayev<br />

(Africa), Charles, E. Cufer, B. Edelman, F. Fleck, J. Harten, J. Kollerova, V. Kesic, I. Koulik, E. and V.<br />

Kurlandzev, G. Kurierova, I. Smirnova, K. Tschouvaschew, K. Turchina and D. Zivadinov.<br />

The 30-minute action consisted of the spreading out of a 22 m x 22 m square made of black fabric in the<br />

central part of Red Square in Moscow.<br />

!


Transcentrala New York, Moscow, Ljubljana<br />

Cross (NY), Panorama (Ljubljana), Black Square on Red Square (Moscow)<br />

3 photographs, each 120 x 112 cm (framed), ed. of 4, 1992-1997<br />

Cross (1991), Black Square on Red Square (1992) and NSK Panorama (1997) are photographic documents<br />

of three actions by the artistsʼ collective Irwin, realized in New York, Moscow and Upper Carniola, and<br />

gathered together under the title Transcentrala. Three Suprematist symbols (cross, square and circle) were<br />

temporally installed in three sites with ideological implications. Following their method of “retro-principle”, the<br />

group re-contextualizes and deconstructs various motifs, symbols and signs from the field of art and politics.<br />

!


Exhibition view: Museum Ostdeutsche Galerie, Regensburg, 2002<br />

!


Corpse of Art<br />

Mixed media installation (acrylic resin on wood, clothes, wax, flowers), variable dimension , first of two<br />

versions, 2003-2004<br />

The installation Corpse of Art copies the circumstances of the laying out of Malevichʼs corpse in his Leningrad<br />

flat in May 1935: displaying it in the Suprematist coffin designed by his student, Nikolai Suetin, according to<br />

Malevichʼs own concept. IRWIN shows the Black Square alone above the coffin – and leaves out the two<br />

realistic images from Malevichʼs work, which flanked the Suprematist icon in the original arrangement. In this<br />

way, IRWIN simultaneously radicalises and undermines Malevichʼs totalitarian claim to mould not only his<br />

whole life but also his own death. As a symbol of the failure of his utopias of Suprematism, IRWIN erects a<br />

memorial to them at the same time and makes Malevichʼs displayed corpse into the medium of his universal<br />

ideas beyond his own death.<br />

(Extract from exhibitionʼs texts of Medium Religion, ZKM Center for Art and Media, Karlsruhe, 2008)<br />

!


Was ist Kunst (Frank Stella)<br />

C-print, plexiglas, aluminum, 161 x 231 cm, ed. of 3, 2002<br />

Photo: Klaus Vyhnalek<br />

«We donʼt consider ourselves as political artists, but rather we focus on how art itself is always political in<br />

certain contexts. We work on icons and stick on just a few «motifs» (subjects). In our paintings we are not<br />

interested in endorsing the idea of the supposed modernistic artistʼs freedom of choice in the subject. Real<br />

freedom for us lies in the idea of restriction.»<br />

IRWIN, festival THE INFLUENCERS, Barcelona, 2006<br />

!


Was ist Kunst (Tiflis)<br />

Ilfochrome, 109 x 146 cm, ed. of 3, 170 x 222 cm, ed. of 5, 2007<br />

Photo: Bojan Radovič<br />

In collaboration with Georgian Army<br />

Co-produced by TRAM foundation for One Stop project in the frame of Art Caucasus 2007<br />

!


Installation view at Cornerhouse, Manchester, 2004<br />

Like to Like<br />

100 x 118 x 6 cm (small size), ed. of 5, 2003-2004<br />

Photo: Tomaž <strong>Gregor</strong>ič<br />

!


Like to Like / the constellation of candles in the field corresponding to the constellation of the stars in<br />

the sky<br />

Photo reconstruction of the group OHO – action: The constellation of candles in the field corresponding to the<br />

constellation of the stars in the sky 1970 (Milenko Matanović), ed. of 5, 2004<br />

!


Like to Like/ Mount Triglav<br />

Photographic reconstruction of the group OHO – action: Mount Triglav from 1970 (Milenko Matanović, David<br />

Nez, Drago Dellabernardina), ed. of 5, 2004<br />

!


Like to Like / Wheat and Rope<br />

Photo reconstruction of the group OHO – action<br />

Wheat and Rope from 1969, ed.of 5, 2003 (Milenko<br />

Matanović)<br />

Irwinʼs project called Like to Like (2003-2004) consists of six large-scale color photographs presenting actions<br />

and projects in landscape. For anyone familiar with Slovene art after 1945, the images are easily<br />

recognizable as projects of the group OHO.<br />

Like to Like / water-air<br />

Photo reconstruction of the group OHO – action<br />

Family of fire, air and water: water-air from 1969, ed.<br />

of 5, 2004 (Marko Pogačnik)<br />

OHO was the most important Slovene neo-avant-garde group of the 60s and early 70s. The word itself is a<br />

combination of oko (eye) and uho (ear) and is, at the same time, an expression of astonishment. Roughly,<br />

OHOʼs activity could be divided into three main periods. In the first period (1969 – 1968), it functioned as a<br />

multi- and inter-media movement (objects, drawings, film, books, actions, visual poetry, music, etc.) with a<br />

broad range of members and collaborators. In the second period, OHO (1969 – 1970) was organized as an<br />

art group, and its activities included contemporary and avant-garde art forms, from arte povera and process<br />

art to land art, performance, body art, and conceptual art. In the last period (1970 – 1971), OHO was<br />

transformed into a community and developed a specific type of conceptual art which aimed at establishing a<br />

spiritual communication and ties between the members of the group and between the group and the world. In<br />

1971, OHO – on the threshold of international success – decided to abandon art as a separate field and try<br />

to find a synthesis of art and life by establishing a community in the village of Šempas.<br />

Irwin re-staged six of OHO projects (originally carried out between 1968 and 1970) that all belong to the most<br />

representative and best known OHO works. They appropriated OHOʼs projects not by using the original<br />

photographs, but by re-staging original actions and by reproducing them on large-scale, perfectly executed<br />

color photographs. This difference is strikingly accentuated by the use of the spectacular possibilities of<br />

contemporary photography. The OHO artist (just as a number of other artists from that period) were never too<br />

interested in producing lasting art objects. Their actions were ephemeral and often carried out without<br />

audience. IRWIN transformed the compositions of the images (originally unimportant and accidental) into<br />

recognizable art icons.<br />

!


Like to Like / Night, bow, burning arrows<br />

Photo reconstruction of the group OHO – action Night,<br />

bow,burning arrows from 1970, ed. of 5, 2004 (Andraž<br />

Šalamun)<br />

What they present, therefore, are not just OHO actions, but OHO as a phenomenon that already belongs to<br />

the history of art and culture. OHO became such a phenomenon also through the process that placed the<br />

documentary images on the position of works of art. This operation can be understood as a symptom of a<br />

more fundamental operation, i.e. of codification and categorization of OHO. But they also point at the<br />

relativity and instability of their meaning. With the change of the context, the same image, symbol, or form<br />

can obtain very different connotations...<br />

Dealing with OHO, Irwin also deal with themselves and their own practices and ideas. Some of these projects<br />

deal with the idea of the collective artistic production, even a collective artistic body. Even those OHO<br />

projects that could be described as works of process art use the model of “family” to describe relations based<br />

on differences, sometimes oppositions or even conflicts, that result in a flexible, dynamic unity.<br />

In his story “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote”, Borges described a late 19th century French writer whose<br />

central work consists of rewriting parts of Cervantesʼ novel. “He did not want to compose another Quixote –<br />

which is easy – but the Quixote itself,” writes Borges. “Needless to say, he never contemplated a mechanical<br />

transcription of the original; he did not propose to copy it. His admirable intention was to produce a few<br />

pages which would coincide – word for word and line for line – with those of Miguel de Cervantes.” When<br />

Irwin re-stage OHO projects, these get a whole new set of references. The wheat field, for example, becomes<br />

a reference to the Irwinʼs recurring motif of the sower. The actions dealing with the collective identity become<br />

references to Irwinʼs collective artistic practice. Re-staging of OHOʼs Triglav project refers to numerous<br />

Irwinʼs works that deal with images of mountains, and particularly to their interest in the ideological content of<br />

the image of mount Triglav that is Slovene national symbol. As Borges says: “Menard (perhaps without<br />

wanting to) has enriched, by means of a new technique, the halting and rudimentary art of reading: this new<br />

technique is that of the deliberate anachronism and the erroneous attribution.<br />

Extract from Like to Like by Igor Zabel, Ljubljana, September 2004<br />

Like to Like / OHO<br />

Photo reconstruction of the group OHO – action<br />

from 1970, ed. of 5, 2004<br />

!


Namepickers<br />

C-Print, 109 x 97 cm, ed. of 5, 1998 (In cooperation with: Marina Abramovic)<br />

Photo: Bojan Brecelj<br />

In a straightforward and simple way – and with an elegant allusion to prostitution – Namepickers points out<br />

that the essence of the artwork is determined by the authorʼs name. Namely, rating of the artistʼs name<br />

affects the market value of the work, and, retroactively, also his identity, which is perceptively – ironically –<br />

completely identical in any case. Thus IRWIN is facing the perfidious logic of a market also capable of<br />

capitalizing the speculative values of the author, even when these prove to be practically indefinable.<br />

!


IRWIN Live<br />

Installation/performance at CCA, Warsaw, 1998 (Guest artist: Zbigniew Libera)<br />

IRWINʼs paintings are hanged on the ceiling, the members of the group are suspended underneath and<br />

discuss about their works.<br />

!


Golden Smile<br />

C-print, 130 x 80 cm, ed. of 5, 2003<br />

Photo: Tomaž <strong>Gregor</strong>ič<br />

!


DA+DA<br />

Video, duration 3ʼ51ʼ, 2010<br />

Bischop M. Zlatanov reciting poems written for H. Ball, Cabaret Voltaire, Zurich 20.4.2010<br />

!


Dreams and Conflicts<br />

ca 170 x 260 cm, ed. of 3, 2003<br />

Photo: Igor Andjelič<br />

In order to create the photograph Dreams and Conflicts, the group Irwin stayed overnight at the Venice train<br />

station during the 50th Venice Biennial (2003). Their goal was to repeat a situation they had first experienced<br />

in 1986 when the group unofficially exhibited parallel to the 42nd Biennial (1986) and had been sleeping at<br />

the train station.<br />

!


The NSK State in Time<br />

(NSK Embassy Moscow, May 10- 12, 1992)<br />

The NSK (Neue Slowenische Kunst or New Slovenian Art) collective has a multiform history. In the early<br />

1980s the fine art group Irwin, together with the music group Laibach, a theatre group Sester.<br />

»The NSK State in Time« was established in the only way possible, as a virtual entity that had no real<br />

territory (as it was said that it was precisely because of territorial concerns that we were witnessing the<br />

Balkan war) but only the insignias of a real State – passports, flag, etc., – which were elaborated as<br />

artefacts. From time to time, however, the »NSK State in Time« was displayed in real space. In the 1990s the<br />

NSK State in Timeʼs Embassies and Consulates were inaugurated in private apartments and houses, hotel<br />

rooms, and similar places to question the politics of space within/outside the Balkans/Europe and the Art<br />

Institution. The group Irwin established the NSK Embassy in Moscow in a private apartment (address:<br />

Leninsky Prospect 12, apt. 24) in May and June 1992. The facade of this residential dwelling was<br />

embellished with the artistically articulated insignia of a state embassy. Spaces that had always been<br />

considered as being outside the matrix of art and culture or at the margins of the system were suddenly<br />

transposed into the centre of the art system. NSK Consulates were opened in Florence, Italy (1993), at the<br />

Hotel Ambasciatori, and in Umag, Croatia (1994), in the kitchen of Marino Cettina, the Dante Gallery ownerʼs<br />

private apartment.<br />

The virtual NSK State tackles ambiguous procedures of codification and the system rules and principles that<br />

serve to define historical coincidence and artificiality. This parallelism between art and the state poses radical<br />

questions about the procedures and instructions that are at the base of the formation of the art system and<br />

which are crucial for its reproduction. »The NSK State in Time« displayed an incredible discontinuity and<br />

provoked an intensive public questioning in time and within time. In an attempt to emphasize the synthetic<br />

dialectical moment developed in »The NSK State in Time«, I asked myself in the mid-1990s how we could<br />

label this spiritual element of corporeality (the State in Time) and this corporeal element of spirituality<br />

(embassies and consulates in concrete private spaces). I proposed that we define them as spectres.<br />

!


NSK Citizens from Nigeria NSK-Logo<br />

2007<br />

Filmed in London from May 5-7, 2007 by film maker and visual anthropologist Esben Hansen<br />

(collaborator: Julie Boticello, anthropologist)<br />

Duration: approximate 80 minutes (non-edited material) ens Sarajevo 2007<br />

I stated, re-elaborating Jacques Derridaʼs The Spectres of Marx, that »The NSK State in Time« is the spectre<br />

of the state; NSK Embassies are spectres of embassies. »The NSK State in Time« was a transposition, as<br />

much as it was also a spectralization of the evacuation of specific historical, social and political spaces of<br />

former Eastern Europe, of its present non-existing condition. Or it is possible to say that precisely because<br />

NSK comes from a territory that is today described as “ex” or “former”, hence firmly grounded in time, NSKʼs<br />

projects imply the re-constitution of its historical, art and cultural space through time. This is why NSKʼs<br />

projects are so intricately involved in re-reading history, in the temporalization and spatialization of culture,<br />

art and the social. With two symbols or indicators – the NSK cross originated within the artistic legacy of<br />

Kasimir Malevich and the Nazi swastika – the virtual NSK State creates terrifying constructions and<br />

narratives deeply rooted in politics.<br />

Irwin reused the cross from Malevichʼs paintings, but emptied it of any spiritual meaning. It is possible to<br />

explain this trajectory as being similar to what Heartfield did with the process of montage. There is something<br />

paradoxical about this virtual state model and its possible (kitschy, That they are like an army is emphasized<br />

by their uniform style of sober suits and ties. Behind their uniform they hide their role of maximizing the<br />

efficiency of the capitalist machine. Through their mode of dress and in the way they function, they are a<br />

normalized anomaly within the capitalist system in Japan. The effect of such juxtapositions is the<br />

derealisation and the de-psychologisation of the reality of the Institution of Contemporary Art. This is politics<br />

beyond simple dichotomies reusing the concept of the de-realisation [and depsychologisation] of art<br />

(although we should be aware that the abstract positioning of art in contemporary capitalism insists on the<br />

psychological moment and on the psychology of the individual artist). Juxtapositions like this result in a<br />

diffracted picture of reality between art and army.<br />

Irwin does not ask us to merely choose between two or more options within a set of coordinates (art vs. army,<br />

etc.), but to change the set of coordinates itself. What we have to deal with here is the traumatic real, the re-<br />

articulation and re-questioning of the position of the army in contemporary societies and art within the art<br />

institution.<br />

Irwin: NSK Guards by Marina Gržinić; Published in Camera Austria, Graz , no. 96/2006.<br />

!


NSK Garda<br />

10 Iris Prints in Plexiglas boxes, from 1998 until 2007<br />

100 x 140 cm; ed. of 3 + AP<br />

50 x 70 cm; ed. of 5 + AP<br />

NSK Garda is a project by group Irwin that started in 1998 in Tirana, Albania (NSK Guard Tirana) and was<br />

later followed by identical realizations in Prague, Zagreb, Rome, Cetinje, Graz, Kyoto, Pristhina, Biskek and<br />

Sarajevo.<br />

All of the projects were organized through the cooperation between local art institutions and army<br />

headquarters. The basic action is very simple: 4 soldiers are guarding the NSK flag, they have crosses on<br />

the armbands and theyʼre standing there for one or two hours. The location is important; it has to be a public<br />

place, square, etc. and is usually linked to the place where we exhibit.<br />

Formally we see this project as some sort of tableau vivant of the real army wearing our and Malevich cross -<br />

art society and army society are social structures that are usually on the opposite ends of the social<br />

spectrum and very rarely mixed. As an art state NSK is in fact in some sort of parasitic relation with other,<br />

normal states and in this project this is made visible.<br />

!


NSK Garda Tirana<br />

In collaboration with Albanian Army<br />

National Gallery, 21. 12. 1998<br />

Ed. of 6<br />

NSK Garda Graz<br />

In collaboration with Austrian Army<br />

Forum Stadtpark, 6. 10. 2001<br />

Iris print, 140 x 100 cm<br />

Photo: Wolfgang Croce<br />

Ed. of 6<br />

NSK Garda Zagreb<br />

In collaboration with Croatian Army<br />

Museum of Contemporary Art, 10. 12.2000<br />

Photo: Igor Andjelič<br />

Ed. of 6<br />

NSK Garda Tbilisi<br />

In collaboration with Georgian Army<br />

TRAM (Transform Art Module) Foundation,<br />

13. 10. 2007. Photo: Bojan Radovič<br />

Ed. of 6<br />

NSK Garda Prague<br />

In collaboration with Czech Army<br />

MXM Gallery, 15. 9. 2000<br />

Photo: Igor Andjelič<br />

Ed. of 6<br />

NSK Garda Biskek<br />

In collaboration with Kyrgyz Army<br />

Kurama Art Gallery, 25. 4. 2004<br />

Photo: Erkin Boljurov<br />

Ed. of 6<br />

!


Retroavantgarde<br />

Mixed media (collage, acrylic on paper), 120 x 200 cm, 1st version, 1996<br />

The Retro-avantgarde project<br />

All «isms» in art were coming from the west, while for us every «ism» was a product of fiction and we<br />

managed to create our own: retro-avangarde. Somehow in the East the art system was lacking some of the<br />

elements it had in the western society. So it was not a matter of opposing to something or reclaiming our own<br />

space, but to build reality. Our condition was to construct our own condition.<br />

IRWIN, festival THE INFLUENCERS, Barcelona, 2006<br />

!


East Art Map<br />

The aim of East Art Map is to show the art of the whole space of Eastern Europe, to take artists out of their<br />

national frameworks and to present them in a unified scheme. IRWIN would like to display the practical<br />

fundamental relations between Eastern European artists there where they have not been documented, to<br />

draw a sort of a clear and user-friendly map of the art of Eastern Europe rather than to get some theoretical<br />

true thereof. History is not given. It has to be constructed.<br />

The group worked over East Art Map project (www.eastartmap.org) from 1999 to 2005. The project is a sort<br />

of a guidebook through the contemporary art of Eastern Europe and its relations with Western arts, social<br />

and political history. Initially, Irwin invited a group of 24 eminent art critics, curators and artists from the<br />

different ex-socialist Central, Eastern and South-Eastern countries to perform and to show 250 crucial art<br />

projects and artworks from their respective countries. Upon the results thereof, in 2006, it published the<br />

project book. The next step, technically as well as conceptually, was to transfer the EAM onto Internet and to<br />

open it up for contributions by its users, the general public and specialists being invited to participate in<br />

discussion, which may, for sure, change the topography of the map.<br />

!


Monochromes<br />

With the exhibition Monochromes, the group only appears to be moving away from visible references to<br />

artistic and political ideologies; in fact, the referencing of “pure,” abstract art is, above all, a commentary on<br />

the history of modernism with all its disjunctures and conflictual potential, as well as, of course, a way of<br />

receiving modernist principles, and Irwinʼs own recent history, in the present time.<br />

From the perspective of art history, monochromatic painting has appeared in a variety of different contexts in<br />

modernism. The common element was the treatment of images as the objects of an understanding in which<br />

painting was most often viewed as research into optical and psychophysical phenomena. Monochromism<br />

appears in the first decade of the twentieth century in the works of Kazimir Malevich and Aleksandr<br />

Rodchenko as the negation of the aesthetic understanding of painting; later, it appears, in less radical but no<br />

less spiritualized forms, in the work of Yves Klein, not to mention the broader tradition of abstract painting<br />

from Piet Mondrian, Josef Albers, and Ad Reinhardt to Frank Stella and Barnett Newman and other European<br />

and American abstractionists.<br />

Press release of the exhibition Monochromes, 2008 at <strong>Galerija</strong> <strong>Gregor</strong> <strong>Podnar</strong>, Berlin<br />

!


Dada magazine 4-5, (1918)<br />

Paper, siver leafs, cloth, bitumen, plaster, 40 x 31 x 6 cm, 2010<br />

!


Multiple Hugo Ball (4/4)<br />

Mixed media, ed. of 5 + AP, 79 x 59 x 6 cm, 2010<br />

!


Yellow Monochrome<br />

Lego bricks, wood, fabric, 91 x 71 x 6 cm, 2007 (Miran Mohar)<br />

!


Green Monochrome- Sower<br />

Oil on canvas, 77,5 x 87 cm, 2007 (Andrej Savski)<br />

!


From Light to Darkness<br />

Wood, silver leaves, epoxy, 85 x 59 x 9 cm, 2007 (Dušan Mandič)<br />

!


Monochrome – green<br />

Painting on wood, plaster, Plexiglas box (covered with a<br />

lenticular screen), 91 x 72 cm, 2008 (Andrej Savski)<br />

Irwin-Monochrome. Icon Deer III<br />

Acrylic on canvas, 60 x 60 cm, 2008 (Roman Uranjek)<br />

Monochrome – Yellow<br />

Oil on panel, 40 x 29,5 x 5,5 cm, 2007 (Borut Vogelnik)<br />

!


Irwin – Copper Monochrome<br />

Print, copper, 150 x 100 cm, 2008 (Roman Uranjek)<br />

Irwin-Monochrome. Icon Cross<br />

Acrylic on canvas, 150 x 100 cm, 2008 (Roman Uranjek)<br />

Grey Monochrome (3D)<br />

Lenticular screen, silver leaves, cloth, 89 x 69 x 6 cm, 2007<br />

!


Irwin Monochrome – I.K.Blue<br />

Pigment, aluminum, 76 x 51 x 5,5 cm, 2008 (Roman Uranjek)<br />

Monochrome<br />

Bischop Metodij Zlatanov of Macedonian<br />

orthodox church, holding an Irwin<br />

Monochrome: Pure red color (dedicated<br />

to A.Rodschenko, 1921)<br />

Iris print, wood, canvas, 109 x 79 cm, 2008<br />

(Dušan Mandič)<br />

Watercolour on Iris print, 72 x 93 cm, 2007 (Borut Voglenik)<br />

!


IRWIN<br />

Founded in 1983<br />

Dušan Mandič, Ljubljana 1954<br />

Miran Mohar, Novo Mesto 1958<br />

Andrej Savski, Ljubljana 1961<br />

Roman Uranjek, Trbovlje 1961<br />

Borut Vogelnik, Kranj 1959<br />

Irwin is also a cofounder of NSK in 1984<br />

Selected solo exhibitions<br />

2012<br />

NSK Passport Office, MoMA, New York, USA<br />

Was ist Kunst Hugo Ball, Elaine Levy Project, Bruxelles, Belgium<br />

2011<br />

Was ist Kunst Hugo Ball, <strong>Galerija</strong> <strong>Gregor</strong> <strong>Podnar</strong>, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

NSK Passport Holders, Acik Ekran New Media Center, Instanbul, Turkey<br />

NSK Folk Art, SKUC Gallery, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

East Art Map, Atelje Dado, Cetinje, Montenegro<br />

2010<br />

First NSK Citizens Congress, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, Germany<br />

State in Time, Dolenjski museum, Novo Mesto, Slovenia<br />

Cabaret Voltaire, Zürich, Switzerland<br />

The Israeli Center for Digital Art, Holon, Israel<br />

NSK Passport Holders, Center for contemporary art, Lagos<br />

2009<br />

NSK Passport Holders, Moderna <strong>Galerija</strong>/T5. Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

NSK Passport Holders, Tri Postal, Lille, France<br />

Was ist Kunst, Kalmar Konstmuseum, Kalmar, Sweden<br />

State in Time, Kunsthalle Krems, Austria<br />

Paintings and Photographies, Galerie Grita Insam, Vienna, Austria<br />

2008<br />

Monochromes, <strong>Galerija</strong> <strong>Gregor</strong> <strong>Podnar</strong>, Berlin, Germany<br />

Black Square on the Red Square, The Crouch - Art Basement Project if the Institute of Contemporary Art, Sofia,<br />

Bulgaria<br />

State in Time, Aarhus Kunstbygning, Aarhus, Denmark<br />

East Art Map, Pinchuk Foundation, Kiev, Ukraine<br />

2007<br />

History Re-constructed, Culturgest, Lisbon, Portugal<br />

2006<br />

East Art Map, Collegium Artisticum, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />

Like to Like, Galerie Grita Insam, Vienna, Austria<br />

Selected Works, Erika Deak Gallery, Budapest, Hungary<br />

Akank sanat Gallery, Instanbul, Turkey<br />

2005<br />

!


East Art Map, Karl Ernst Osthaus Museum, Hagen, Germany<br />

Like to Like, Gheto, Split, Croatia<br />

Neil Rector NSK Collection, (together with NSK) Frye Art Museum, Seattle, USA<br />

Like to Like, Art Centre Lazareti, Dubrovnik, Croatia<br />

2004<br />

Hysteria and two of her female friends, <strong>Galerija</strong> Škuc, Ljubljana<br />

Like to Like, Artspace, Sydney, Australia<br />

Like to Like, Experimental Art Foundation, Adelaide, Australia<br />

East Art Map, Project Arts Centre, Dublin, Ireland<br />

Like to Like, Cornerhouse, Manchester, UK<br />

2003<br />

Retroprincip, Künstlerhaus Bethanien, Berlin; Karl Ernst Osthaus Museum, Hagen; Museum of Modern Art,<br />

Belgrade, Serbian<br />

Galerie Inge Baecker,Cologne, Germany<br />

2002<br />

Rekapitulacija, Museum Ostdeutsche Galerie, Regensburg, Germany<br />

Sound Icons, Galeria Bonomo, Rome, Italy<br />

2001<br />

Self-portraits and Projects, Retroavantgarde, Galeria Bonomo, Bari, Italy<br />

2000<br />

Irwin Live, Museum of Modern Art, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Privatization of Time, Museum of Contemporary Art, Zagreb, Croatia<br />

Interiors of the Planit, Ursula Noordung, Retroavantgarde, Galerie Rabouan Moussion, Paris, France<br />

1998<br />

Three Projects, ICA Ujazdowski Castle, Warsaw, Poland<br />

Transnacionala Vienna, Galerie Grita Insam, Vienna, Austria<br />

1997<br />

Interior of the Planit, Tramway, Glasgow, UK<br />

Transnacionala Barcelona, Sala Montcada de la Fundacio La Caixa, Barcelona, Spain<br />

1996<br />

Transnacionala (conceptualized journey from East to the West Coast), project "Conversation at the Castle",<br />

Atlanta, USA<br />

Interior of the Planit, Ludwig Museum Budapest, Budapest, Hungary<br />

1995<br />

The Interiors of the Planit, Anonimus Gallery, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Project Proposal for the NSK Embassy in Beijing, Galerie Bleich-Rossi, Graz, Austria<br />

1994<br />

Project Proposal for the NSK Embassy in Beijing, Galerie Inge Baecker, Cologne, Germany<br />

NSK Konzulat Umag, <strong>Galerija</strong> Dante, Umag, Slovenia<br />

1993<br />

Irwin-NSK Embassy Moscow Interior, Center on Contemporary Art, Seattle, USA<br />

Transcentrala, Old Poverplant, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

1992<br />

La Geografia del Tempo, Galleria Carini, Florence, Italy<br />

NSK Embassy – Moscow, Apt Art and Ridzina Gallery, Moscow, Russia<br />

1991<br />

!


Kapital, Pittsburgh Center for the Arts - National Gallery, Pittsburgh; New Langton Arts, San Francisco, The Institute<br />

for Contemporary Arts, Clocktower Gallery, New York; District of Columbia Arts Centre, Washington D.C.USA<br />

1990<br />

Kapital, <strong>Galerija</strong> Equrna, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Selected group exhibitions<br />

2012<br />

One Sixt of the Earth. Ecologies of image, MUSAC, Castilla y Leon, Spain<br />

The Present and Presence, Musuem of Contemporary Art Metelkova, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

2011<br />

Night of Museums and Galleries, Plovdiv, Bulgaria<br />

The Global Contemporary. The Art Worlds after 1989. ZKM, Center for Art and Media, Karlsruhe Germany<br />

Dada Moscow, Artplay Design Center, Moscow, Russia<br />

Ensayos de geopoetica, Mercosur Biennal, Porto Alegre, Brasil<br />

Impossible Community, The State Museum of Contemporary Art of the Russian Academy of Arts, Russia<br />

A Slodown at the Museum, Extra City, Kunsthalle Antwerpen, Germany<br />

The international. MACBA, Museum of contemporary Art, Barcelona, Spain<br />

European Triennial of Small Sculpture. <strong>Galerija</strong> Murska Sobota, Slovenia<br />

Il corpo metafora di unʼesperienza. CIAC, Centro Italiano Arte Contemporanea, Foligno, Italy<br />

2010<br />

Things evoke feelings, CSW Center for Contemporary Art Ujazdowski Castle, Warsaw, Poland<br />

Taipei Biennial 2010, Taiwan<br />

Wealth of Nations, Spike Island, Bristol, United Kingdom<br />

The Promises of the Past. A discontinuous history of art in Eastern Europe, Pompidou Centre, Paris<br />

Heimtat Donovina, Museum Moderner Kunst Kärnten, Klagenfurt, Austria<br />

Quartet–Four Biennials Reflected in Prints, International Centre of Graphic Arts (MGLC), Ljubljana. Curated by<br />

René Block, Berlin, Germany<br />

2009<br />

La Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena, Italy<br />

3rd Moscow Biennial for Contemporary Art at Red October Chocolate Factory, Moscow, Russia<br />

Modernologies, MACBA, Barcelona, Spain, traveling to Museum of Modern Art, Warsaw, Poland<br />

A pair of Left Shoes, Bochum Musem, Germay. Travel to: Museum of Contemporary Art of Zagreb, Croatia<br />

Utopics, 11e Exposition Suisse de Sculpture, Biel, Switzerland<br />

RE:akt! Reconstruction, Re-enactment, Re-reporting MNAC, Bucharest. Travel to:<br />

SKUC gallery, Ljubljana, and Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Rijeka<br />

Europe XXL, Tripostal, Lille, France<br />

2008<br />

1st Brussels Biennial for contemporary art, Brussels, Belgium<br />

Taipei Biennial, The Taipei Art Museum, Taiwan<br />

Medium Religion, ZKM, Karlsruhe, Germany<br />

Here is Every, Four Decades of Contemporary Art, MoMA, New York, USA<br />

Signs of Change; Social Movement Cultures 1960s to Now, Exit Art, New York, USA<br />

The Renaming Machine, P74 Center and Gallery, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Kontakt… Works from the Art Collection of Erste Bank Group, Institute of Contemporary Art – Dunaujvaros,<br />

Hungary<br />

Genau+Anders – Mathematik in der Kunst von Dürer bis Sol LeWitt, MUMOK, Vienna, Austria<br />

Less is less and more is more, that´all, CAPC Musée d´Art Contemporain, Bordeaux, France<br />

The Art World, Unit 40, London, UK<br />

2007<br />

Erste Bank Collection, MoCAB Museum of Contemporary Art, Belgrad, Serbian<br />

Not-quite/Not-right, <strong>Galerija</strong> Herman Pečarič, Piran, Slovenia<br />

!


Grow Your Own, Palais de Tokyo, Paris, France<br />

Das Schwarze Quadrat. Hommage an Malewitsch, Hamburger Kunsthalle, Hamburg, Germany<br />

Not-quite/Not-right, Foto galerija, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Not-quite/Not-right, Pilonova galerija, Ajdovščina, Slovenia<br />

Locally Localized Gravity, ICA Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA<br />

One Stop, Tram, Tbilisi, Georgia<br />

2006<br />

Eye on Europe, MOMA, Museum of Modern Art, New York (cat.), USA<br />

Kontakt … works from the Collection of Erste Bank Group, MUMOK, Museum Moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig,<br />

Vienna (cat.), Austria<br />

Normalisation, Rooseum Center for Contemporary Art, Malmö, Sweden<br />

The Sun on the Wall, Arsenals, (Trajectory series, LCCA), Riga, Latvia<br />

Essence of Life Art, The State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia<br />

Interrupted Histories, Moderna galerija, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

On Difference 2, Stuttgart Kunstverein, Stuttgart, Germany<br />

Political Realities, Heidelberger Kunstverein, Heidelberg, Germany<br />

2005<br />

Collective Creativity, Fridricianum, Kassel, Germany<br />

7th Sharjah biennial, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates<br />

Istanbul Biennial, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

Politike Slikarstva, Cankarjev dom, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

2004<br />

Berlin – Moscow / Mocsow – Berlin, Historical Museum, Moscow, Russia<br />

Venture, <strong>Galerija</strong> <strong>Gregor</strong> <strong>Podnar</strong>, Kranj, Slovenia<br />

EV+A Biennial, Limerick, Ireland<br />

…and Others, Kyrgyz National Museum of Fine Art / Kurama Art Gallery, Bishkek, Kyrgystan<br />

The Post_Communist Condition, Kunst-Werke, Berlin, Germany<br />

The beauty of failure / The failure of beauty, Joan Miró Foundation, Barcelona, Spain<br />

Lodz Biennial, Warshaw, Poland<br />

Il Buon Governo dellArte, Modern and Contemporary Art City Museum, Bergamo, Italy<br />

2003<br />

Individual Systems, Biennial of Venice, Venice, Italy<br />

2002<br />

Museotopia, Karl Ernst Osthaus Museum, Hagen, Germany<br />

(Un)painted, Essel Museum, Vienna, Austria<br />

State Museum of Contemporary Art, Thessaloniki, Greece<br />

2001<br />

U3, Vulgata, Museum of Modern Art Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Artisti Asuonati, Flash Art Museum, Trevi, Italy<br />

Europa 2000, Palazzo della triennale, Milano, Italy<br />

Le Tribu delarte, Galeria Moderna e Contemporanea, Rome, Italy<br />

Oko in njegova resnica, Museum of Modern Art Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Vulgata, Neuer Berliner Kunsverein, Berlin, Germany<br />

Jahresgaben 2001, Kölnischer Kunstverein, Cologne, Germany<br />

2000+ Arteast Collection, Kongresscentrum, Innsbruck, Austria<br />

Diesseits und Jenseits des Traums, Sigmund Freud Museum, Wien, Austria<br />

2000<br />

Das Fünfte Element/Geld oder Kunst, Kunsthalle Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany<br />

Osmica v horizontali, Cankarjev Dom, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Lautre moitie de lEurope, Jeu de Paume, Paris, France<br />

1999<br />

!


After the Wall, Moderna Museet, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Stop the Violence, Art Academy in collaboration with MAK, Vienna, Austria<br />

1997<br />

Istanbul Biennial, Instanbul, Turkey<br />

This Art is Recycled, Škuc Gallery, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Alpenblicke, Kunsthalle Wien, Vienna, Austria<br />

U3, Museum of Modern Art Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

1996<br />

Manifesta, Boyman Museum, Rotterdam, Netherlands<br />

Interpol, Institute for Contemporary Art and Architecture, Farbfabrik, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Discord: Sabotage of Realities, Hamburg Kunstverein, Hamburg, Germany<br />

1995<br />

The Collection of the P.A.R.A.S.I.T.E. Museum, Kunsthalle, Budapest, Hungary<br />

1993<br />

Padiglione NSK, Biennale di Venezia, Venice, Italy<br />

Art in the Measure of the World, Kunsthalle Kiel, Kiel, Germany<br />

1992<br />

Molteplici Culture, Convento di S.Egidio, Rome, Italy<br />

First Hand Art, Regina Gallery, Moscow, Russia<br />

Identität: Differenz, Neue Galerie, Graz, Austria<br />

1991<br />

Slovenske Atene, Moderna galerija, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Vanderlieder, Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />

1990<br />

Fra-Yu-Kult,Monastery Široki Brijeg, Lištica; 369 Gallery, Edinburgh, UK<br />

Team Spirit, Neuberger Museum, State University of New York, New York, USA<br />

!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!