10.07.2015 Views

brief - Iran 911 Case

brief - Iran 911 Case

brief - Iran 911 Case

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of Mughniyah‘s offices in Beirut.‖ Baer, See No Evil, p. 266. Indeed, ―senior al-Qaedaand <strong>Iran</strong>ian officials met repeatedly during this time‖ [after bin Laden‘s return toAfghanistan in 1996],‖ and ―continued to collaborate in pursuit of their common anti-American agenda.‖ Ex. 8, Clawson Affid. 59. At this time, <strong>Iran</strong>ian and Hizballahtrainers traveled between <strong>Iran</strong> and Afghanistan, transferring to al Qaeda operatives suchmaterial as blueprints and drawings of bombs, manuals for wireless equipment, andinstruction booklets for avoiding detection by unmanned aircraft. Ex. 7, Bergman Affid.68. (Witness Y testifies about <strong>Iran</strong>‘s training of al Qaeda cadres in Afghanistan.)As will be discussed in Plaintiffs‘ Second (Sealed) Memorandum of Law, the<strong>Iran</strong>ian defector witnesses X, Y, and Z all reveal that <strong>Iran</strong> did have foreknowledge of the9/11 attacks, that <strong>Iran</strong> was involved in the design of the 9/11 operation, and that <strong>Iran</strong>played a role in training and preparing for execution of the 9/11 attacks.VII.PLAINTIFFS’ EVIDENCE IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING PROOF OF IRAN’SMATERIAL AND DIRECT SUPPORT FOR AL QAEDAPlaintiffs‘ expert evidence in this case demonstrates clearly and convincingly that<strong>Iran</strong> and its officials, acting on behalf of the <strong>Iran</strong>ian government and within the scope oftheir offices, provided material support to al Qaeda. 90 In cases regarding the statesponsoredterrorism exception to the FSIA, such as this one, courts rely extensively onsuch expert testimony. E.g., Valore v. Islamic Republic of <strong>Iran</strong>, 478 F.Supp.2d 101, 105(D.D.C. 2007)(finding Dr. Clawson is a ―renowned expert on <strong>Iran</strong>ian affairs‖ to find that―Hezbollah was a creature of the <strong>Iran</strong>ian government, acting almost entirely under the90 As noted by Chief Judge Lamberth in In Re Islamic Republic of <strong>Iran</strong> Terrorism Litigation, supra, aplaintiff need not establish that the material support or resources provided by a foreign state for aterrorist act contributed directly to the act from which his claim arises. Nevertheless, much of theevidence presented by the Plaintiffs here establishes that <strong>Iran</strong> provided material and direct support to alQaeda for the specific purpose of facilitating the 9/11 attacks.94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!