10.07.2015 Views

brief - Iran 911 Case

brief - Iran 911 Case

brief - Iran 911 Case

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Iran</strong> provided material and direct support by aiding and abetting al Qaeda members whoevaded the American-led military forces that uprooted al Qaeda and overthrew theTaliban regime in Afghanistan in late 2001. ―Few if any noted terrorism experts woulddispute that <strong>Iran</strong> provides material support to al-Qaeda within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.Section 2339A(b)1.‖ Ex. 8, Clawson Affid. 56 (emphasis omitted).3. THE FACT WITNESSESThe Havlish Plaintiffs also submit, under seal at present, approximately twentyeight(28) hours of sworn fact witness testimony, via videotaped depositions of four<strong>Iran</strong>ian witnesses. Three of these witnesses are defectors from the <strong>Iran</strong>ian governmentwho testify to their knowledge of <strong>Iran</strong>ian government complicity in the 9/11 attacks –before, contemporaneously with, and after, the attacks, supported by government lettersand memoranda, photographs, and organizational charts. The factual evidence alsoincludes a sealed affidavit of an American investigative journalist who corroboratescertain aspects of the sealed testimony, provides details concerning the Havlish fieldinvestigation which produced the factual testimony of the four <strong>Iran</strong>ian witnesses, anddiscloses additional supporting facts and sources.a. Witnesses X, Y, and Z. Three of the Havlish fact witnesses are defectors<strong>Iran</strong>‘s secretive Ministry of Information and Security (―MOIS‖), roughly the equivalentof the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, who worked in positions that gave them accessto sensitive information regarding <strong>Iran</strong>‘s state sponsorship of terrorism. Very little of theevidence contained in the sealed testimony of Witnesses X, Y, and Z (Ex. S-1, S-2, S-3,S-4, S-5, S-6, and S-7), discussed in Plaintiffs‘ Second (Sealed) Memorandum, has beenbrought to light in any public forum, although some of it is apparently known to the U.S.34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!