APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONFOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST SOVEREIGN DEFENDANTSemployee, or agent of that foreign state while acting within the scope ofhis or her office, employment, or agency, shall be liable to –(1) a national of the United States,(2) a member of the armed forces,(3) an employee of the Government of the United States, or of anindividual performing a contract awarded by the United StatesGovernment, acting within the scope of the employee's employment, or(4) the legal representative of a person described in paragraph (1), (2), or(3),for personal injury or death caused by acts described in subsection (a)(1)of that foreign state, or of an official, employee, or agent of that foreignstate, for which the courts of the United States may maintain jurisdictionunder this section for money damages. In any such action, damages mayinclude economic damages, solatium, pain and suffering, and punitivedamages. In any such action, a foreign state shall be vicariously liable forthe acts of its officials, employees, or agents.APPENDIX CThe Flatow Amendment and the Enactment of §1605AWhen the FSIA‘s terrorism exception was first enacted in April 1996, it was not clearwhether the statute established an independent federal cause of action against foreign statesponsors of terrorism. In an attempt to clarify matters, Congress passed the ―FlatowAmendment,‖ enacted as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997. SeePub.L. 104-208, §589, 110 (1996), 110 Stat. 3009-1, 3009-172 (codified at 28 U.S.C. §1605note). In pertinent part, the Flatow Amendment provides:(a) An official, employee, or agent of a foreign state designated as a statesponsor of terrorism designated under section 6(j) of the Exportiv
APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONFOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST SOVEREIGN DEFENDANTSAdministration Act of 1979 [section 2405(j) of the Appendix to Title 50,War and National Defense] while acting within the scope of his or heroffice, employment, or agency shall be liable to a United States national orthe national's legal representative for personal injury or death caused byacts of that official, employee, or agent for which the courts of the UnitedStates may maintain jurisdiction under section 1605(a)(7) of title 28,United States Code [subsec. (a)(7) of this section] for money damageswhich may include economic damages, solatium, pain, and suffering, andpunitive damages if the acts were among those described in section1605(a)(7) [subsec. (a)(7) of this section].The Flatow Amendment permits U.S. nationals injured in terrorist attacks to pursue aprivate right of action against officials, employees, and agents of designated foreign states actingin their official capacities. However, in 2004, two years after the present action was filed, theUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that §1605(a)(7)conferred jurisdiction on the district court, but did not create a substantive cause of action againstthe foreign state itself. Cicippio-Puleo v. Islamic Republic of <strong>Iran</strong>, 353 F.3d 1024, 1032 (D.C.Cir. 2004). The Cicippio-Puleo court also held that there is no federal private right of actionagainst foreign governments – as opposed to individuals – under the Flatow Amendment. Id. at1027. The D.C. Circuit concluded that FSIA plaintiffs cannot state a claim under the ―genericcommon law‖ but must ―identify a particular cause of action arising out of a specific source oflaw.‖ Id. at 1037. See also Acree v. Republic of Iraq, 370 F.3d 41, 59 (D.C. Cir. 2004). As aresult, plaintiffs seeking to recover damages caused by state-sponsored acts of terrorism couldassert jurisdiction under the FSIA, but were then required to establish liability under the variouspersonal injury laws of U.S. states.v
- Page 2:
FOREIGN STATE DEFENDANTS: ::THE ISL
- Page 12 and 13:
D. CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF NON-U.S. NAT
- Page 15 and 16:
In order to revise its pleading to
- Page 17 and 18:
cooperated and coordinated with, an
- Page 19 and 20:
Indeed, the 9/11 REPORT notes a num
- Page 21 and 22:
senior Hezbollah operative. Also in
- Page 23 and 24:
Timmerman 2nd Affid. 124. 14Althoug
- Page 25 and 26:
facilitating the travel of the 9/11
- Page 27 and 28:
officials provided direct and mater
- Page 29 and 30:
after September 11, 2001, in the fo
- Page 31 and 32:
instrument of foreign and domestic
- Page 33 and 34:
Perhaps the leading expert on Iran
- Page 35 and 36:
INTERPOL, Edgar A. Adamson attests,
- Page 37 and 38:
2. THE ROBERT BAER PUBLICATIONSForm
- Page 39 and 40:
Iran provided material and direct s
- Page 41 and 42:
Iran‘s anticipation of a retaliat
- Page 43 and 44:
every year since 1984. Ex. 3, Byman
- Page 45 and 46:
Testimony of Witness X, February 23
- Page 47 and 48:
unning through the contemporary Mid
- Page 49 and 50:
We Know, p. 127; Ex. 6, Lopez-Tefft
- Page 51 and 52:
Department reports on global terror
- Page 53 and 54:
terrorist recruits from a variety o
- Page 55 and 56:
and al Qaeda, of the ―most formid
- Page 57 and 58: predictable occurrence.‖ Ex. 6, L
- Page 59 and 60: The factual reality - as found by t
- Page 61 and 62: Zawahiri met with Imad Mughniyah, w
- Page 63 and 64: The historic 1993 meeting in Kharto
- Page 65 and 66: continuing terrorist training of al
- Page 67 and 68: the issuance of INTERPOL Red Notice
- Page 69 and 70: investigators concluded the operati
- Page 71 and 72: symbols. Ex. 6, Lopez-Tefft Affid.
- Page 73 and 74: worldwide terrorism is ―a report
- Page 75 and 76: AND TERRORIST TRAVEL, pp. 65-66. Mo
- Page 77 and 78: see Ex. 2, Timmerman 2nd Affid. 148
- Page 79 and 80: that the ―senior Hezbollah operat
- Page 81 and 82: actual foreknowledge of the plannin
- Page 83 and 84: Thus, Iran‘s facilitation of the
- Page 85 and 86: the present day. Testifying before
- Page 87 and 88: January 16, 2009; Ex. 2, Timmerman
- Page 89 and 90: The January 16, 2009, Treasury desi
- Page 91 and 92: Indeed, Iran permitted al Qaeda to
- Page 93 and 94: The fact is that many important ―
- Page 95 and 96: little other than KSM‘s own self-
- Page 97 and 98: terrorism operations against the U.
- Page 99 and 100: of Mughniyah‘s offices in Beirut.
- Page 101 and 102: provided material support to al Qae
- Page 103 and 104: Walter S. Batty, Jr. (PA Bar No. 02
- Page 105 and 106: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 107: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 111 and 112: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 119 and 120: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 123 and 124: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 125 and 126: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR
- Page 127: APPENDICESPLAINTIFFS’ FIRST MEMOR