09.07.2015 Views

Using Laboratory Experiments to Study Law and Crime - Chair of ...

Using Laboratory Experiments to Study Law and Crime - Chair of ...

Using Laboratory Experiments to Study Law and Crime - Chair of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ththThe 19 <strong>and</strong> 20 centuries produced breakthroughs in physics, chemistry, <strong>and</strong> thebiological sciences. <strong>Labora<strong>to</strong>ry</strong> research played an important role in the rapid advances made inthese fields. Can labora<strong>to</strong>ry research also contribute <strong>to</strong> progress in the social sciences? Can itcontribute <strong>to</strong> progress in law <strong>and</strong> criminology?Open any social science methods textbook <strong>and</strong> you will see evaluations <strong>of</strong> the strengths<strong>and</strong> weaknesses <strong>of</strong> different methods. These evaluations typically include a claim that labora<strong>to</strong>ryexperiments are high in internal validity <strong>and</strong> low in external validity. This claim sometimes isfollowed by the conclusion that, in practice, labora<strong>to</strong>ry experiments are <strong>of</strong> little use in the socialsciences. But this conclusion is premature. <strong>Labora<strong>to</strong>ry</strong> experiments can be used <strong>to</strong> develop <strong>and</strong>test not just theories about the physical world, but also about the social world. By relying onmultiple methods – including labora<strong>to</strong>ry experiments – we can increase our knowledge.To make this argument, we begin by discussing what labora<strong>to</strong>ry experiments can <strong>and</strong>cannot do. We then describe three issues in the criminological <strong>and</strong> legal literature – whyviolence is higher in the southern United States than in the North, the relation between theseverity <strong>of</strong> punishment <strong>and</strong> crime, <strong>and</strong> the expressive effects <strong>of</strong> law. We describe the relevantdata from labora<strong>to</strong>ry experiments <strong>and</strong> discuss how these data complement those gained throughother methods.WHAT LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS CAN AND CANNOT DOHis<strong>to</strong>rically, criminologists have most commonly relied on surveys, data from <strong>of</strong>ficialrecords <strong>and</strong> other sources <strong>of</strong> quantitative data, along with ethnographic studies (for someexceptions see Steffensmeier <strong>and</strong> Terry 1975). Recently, field experiments have garneredattention because <strong>of</strong> their strengths in determining causality (see, for example Farring<strong>to</strong>n <strong>and</strong>Welsh 2005 for a review <strong>of</strong> the last two decades; see also Welsh <strong>and</strong> Farring<strong>to</strong>n 2001). An entirejournal (the Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Criminology) is now devoted <strong>to</strong> reporting experimental2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!