Using Laboratory Experiments to Study Law and Crime - Chair of ...
Using Laboratory Experiments to Study Law and Crime - Chair of ...
Using Laboratory Experiments to Study Law and Crime - Chair of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ENDNOTES1. A similar argument can be made regarding the experimental setting. The question is whetherthe characteristics <strong>of</strong> the experimental setting interact with the theoretical causal fac<strong>to</strong>rs.2. The comparison <strong>of</strong> Southerner <strong>and</strong> Northerners does not involve a true experimentalmanipulation because whether the subject was a Southerner or a Northerner was notmanipulated. Similarly, researchers cannot manipulate the race or gender <strong>of</strong> the subject – thoughthey can manipulate theoretically relevant aspects <strong>of</strong> race, gender, <strong>and</strong> so forth (for an examplein the context <strong>of</strong> race see Lovaglia et al. 1998).3. For reviews <strong>of</strong> deterrence research see Doob <strong>and</strong> Webster (2003); Maguire (2002), Nagin(1989), <strong>and</strong> Tierney (1996).4. The underlying mechanism is the game theoretical concept <strong>of</strong> ``mixed Nash equilibria'', whichrequires rational agents <strong>to</strong> outsmart their opponents. This concept assumes that citizens choosethe probability <strong>of</strong> committing a crime at the indifference point <strong>of</strong> the inspec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> inspec<strong>to</strong>rschoose the probability <strong>of</strong> inspection at the indifference point <strong>of</strong> the criminals (see Rauhut <strong>and</strong>Junker 2009; Tsebelis1989; 1990). This implies that more severe punishment reduces controlrather than crime.33