09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SUBJECTIVISM OF ACTIVE MINDSexpectations fit together. This complementarity is a strength <strong>of</strong>the theory. Keynes’s treatment <strong>of</strong> long-run expectations runsmostly <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> psychological expectations. It is not clear, <strong>in</strong>his analysis, what <strong>in</strong>stitutional properties <strong>of</strong> asset marketsencourage the perversities he identifies <strong>and</strong> what propertiesdiscourage them. (Keynes refers only to liquidity.) Rationalexpectations models refer, presumably, to dispositionalexpectations. They seem to imply that psychologicalexpectations are perfectly plastic, tak<strong>in</strong>g on whatever form isneeded to generate the predicted behaviour. As Thomas Sargenthas noted, this may imply that economic agents know withcerta<strong>in</strong>ty the very structural parameters <strong>of</strong> the economy thateconometricians can only estimate with uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty (Sargent1993:21). The examples <strong>of</strong> Keynes <strong>and</strong> rational expectationshelp to show that we should prefer economic arguments thatcomb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> correlate plausible treatments <strong>of</strong> both psychological<strong>and</strong> dispositional expectations.Dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g dispositional <strong>and</strong> psychological expectationshelps us to see how we might fit Schutz <strong>and</strong> Hayek <strong>in</strong>to a consistenttheory <strong>of</strong> expectations. The Big Players theory suggests the utility <strong>of</strong>do<strong>in</strong>g so. The proposed <strong>in</strong>tegration seems to yield testablehypotheses. It may be true, then, that <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g Schutz <strong>and</strong> Hayekwill help to solve the Lachmann problem.ConclusionThe Lachmann problem was stated at least as early as 1943. For themost part it has rema<strong>in</strong>ed unsolved. Some progress has been madeby Lachmann <strong>and</strong> others through the recognition <strong>of</strong> theco-ord<strong>in</strong>ative function <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions, ‘nodal po<strong>in</strong>ts’ <strong>of</strong>co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation as Lachmann called them. But much rema<strong>in</strong>s to bedone. I conjecture that this <strong>in</strong>tractability has been due <strong>in</strong> part to atendency by researchers follow<strong>in</strong>g Lachmann to look for eitherKeynesian or Misesian solutions. If <strong>in</strong>stead we try to placeconsiderations <strong>of</strong> anonymity raised by Schutz <strong>in</strong> a Hayekian context<strong>of</strong> social evolution, we may make more progress.AcknowledgementsI thank William Butos for useful comments. Any deficiencies <strong>of</strong> thetext are my fault.77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!