09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STEPHEN D.PARSONS<strong>in</strong>terpreted as an attempt to develop a more coherent underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> human action than that prevalent <strong>in</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> Mises. This isbecause Mises’s account is deficient both <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> hisunderst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g as to how human action is to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>his underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g as to what human action consists <strong>of</strong>. In fact, thesetwo problems are <strong>in</strong>terrelated: it is precisely because <strong>of</strong> hismethodological approach that Mises encounters problems <strong>in</strong>expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g human action. Lachmann’s theory can thus beunderstood as a criticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> an attempt to resolve difficulties <strong>in</strong>both Mises’s <strong>and</strong> rational choice theories <strong>of</strong> human action. Thesetheories can be classified together <strong>in</strong> this respect because Lachmannis implicitly draw<strong>in</strong>g attention to a problem they both share:expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g future <strong>in</strong>tentions.Mises <strong>and</strong> Lachmann on history <strong>and</strong> economicsInitially, it seems quite clear that Mises <strong>and</strong> Lachmann are <strong>in</strong> directopposition concern<strong>in</strong>g the subject matter <strong>of</strong> economics. Misesdef<strong>in</strong>ed economics as an a priori universally valid science <strong>of</strong> humanaction:The science <strong>of</strong> human action that strives for universally validknowledge is the theoretical system whose hitherto bestelaborated branch is economics. In all its branches this scienceis a priori, not empirical…it is not derived from experience; itis prior to experience.(Mises 1981:12–13)The science <strong>of</strong> human action, or praxeology, was concerned withestablish<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> universal categories, which are necessary withreference to human action: ‘The cognition <strong>of</strong> praxeology isconceptual cognition. It refers to what is necessary <strong>in</strong> human action.It is a cognition <strong>of</strong> universals <strong>and</strong> categories’ (Mises 1949:51).The ‘necessity’ referred to here is meant <strong>in</strong> a dual sense: the apriori categories <strong>of</strong> human action are required both <strong>in</strong> order to act<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> order to comprehend the actions <strong>of</strong> others. As praxeologywas a ‘cognition <strong>of</strong> universals’, then it could not comprehend the<strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> unique. Because the unique could not be brought underuniversal categories, it was ‘irrational’, <strong>and</strong> thus the concern <strong>of</strong> history,not economics: ‘Individuality is given to the historian, it is exactlywhat cannot be exhaustively expla<strong>in</strong>ed or traced back to other entities.In this sense <strong>in</strong>dividuality is irrational’ (Mises 1990:12).32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!