09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JOCHEN RUNDE AND JÖRG BIBOWthe bank<strong>in</strong>g system s balance sheet. (In the General Theory, <strong>in</strong>contrast, all <strong>in</strong>stitutional detail is suppressed <strong>and</strong> the whole effect <strong>of</strong>changes <strong>in</strong> beliefs is necessarily on security prices, given that thestock <strong>of</strong> money, that is the size <strong>of</strong> the bank<strong>in</strong>g system s balancesheet, is constant by assumption.)To beg<strong>in</strong> with, <strong>in</strong> the Treatise on Money bearish views on the part<strong>of</strong> the public may have no effect on securities prices where theseviews are compensated by the bank<strong>in</strong>g system tak<strong>in</strong>g the oppositeview <strong>and</strong> buy<strong>in</strong>g the securities. An alternative possible case <strong>of</strong>divergent beliefs mentioned by Keynes occurs when ‘two views’develop with<strong>in</strong> the public. Whilst <strong>in</strong> the former case the bank<strong>in</strong>gsystem <strong>and</strong> the public hold oppos<strong>in</strong>g views, <strong>and</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> a change<strong>in</strong> beliefs about future prices may be reflected partly <strong>in</strong> security prices<strong>and</strong> partly <strong>in</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the bank<strong>in</strong>g system’s balancesheet, <strong>in</strong> the latter case changes <strong>in</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the bank<strong>in</strong>g system’sbalance sheet do not necessarily require the bank<strong>in</strong>g system to take aparticular view. Rather it may simply provide additional short-termadvances to the ‘bulls’ who buy securities from the ‘bears’ who endup hold<strong>in</strong>g more ‘sav<strong>in</strong>gs deposits B’. Keynes f<strong>in</strong>ds that both ‘bull’<strong>and</strong> ‘bear’ markets may occur with either convergent or divergentexpectations about future prices. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a bullmarket with convergent expectations, bears are clos<strong>in</strong>g their positionson a ris<strong>in</strong>g market <strong>and</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs deposits B falls. In abull market with divergent expectations, <strong>in</strong> contrast, bears may be<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their positions on a ris<strong>in</strong>g market. To repeat, the size <strong>of</strong>the bank<strong>in</strong>g system’s balance sheet (<strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gsdeposits B provided) may change either because the bank<strong>in</strong>g systemitself is tak<strong>in</strong>g a view on securities prices or because it decides t<strong>of</strong>acilitate the chang<strong>in</strong>g degree <strong>of</strong> divergence <strong>of</strong> beliefs with<strong>in</strong> the public,where the public may also take recourse to channels outside thebank<strong>in</strong>g system.Keynes (1971:225) ventures that both the volume <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialtransactions <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> bear positions are ‘likely to bephenomena <strong>of</strong> rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g prices rather than <strong>of</strong> an absolutelyhigh or low level’. The volatility <strong>of</strong> prices, for <strong>in</strong>stance, may reflectcontradictory <strong>in</strong>formation that becomes available <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases thediversity <strong>of</strong> beliefs about future prices. In addition, Keynes mentionsthe possibility <strong>of</strong> speculative excesses lead<strong>in</strong>g to what we would nowcall ‘bubbles’. He f<strong>in</strong>ds that such a development may be related <strong>in</strong> itsf<strong>in</strong>al stage to beliefs about future prices that have diverged widely,with abrupt falls <strong>in</strong> security prices resolv<strong>in</strong>g the tension betweenoppos<strong>in</strong>g views.194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!