09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JOCHEN RUNDE AND JÖRG BIBOW<strong>of</strong> the particular share itself, <strong>and</strong> which <strong>in</strong>troduce the more generalconsiderations <strong>of</strong> ‘market’ confidence <strong>and</strong> liquidity.These complexities suggest that the relation between divergentexpectations <strong>and</strong> equity prices must be qualified <strong>and</strong> extended. Wepropose to do so by focus<strong>in</strong>g on what we shall call the diversity <strong>of</strong>op<strong>in</strong>ion between market participants, not about future prices,yields, etc., but about the value they attach to any particular share.In particular we would like to focus on the fact that, at any po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong> time, there are likely to be marked differences between marketparticipants about what a share is currently worth to them <strong>in</strong>money terms whatever the source <strong>of</strong> these differences. The keydist<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> what follows, then, is between the diversity <strong>of</strong>op<strong>in</strong>ion on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> divergent expectations or beliefs(about future prices, for example) on the other. The former term,to repeat, will refer to the money value that <strong>in</strong>vestors, potential orotherwise, attach to a share at some po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time, the latter toexpectations about the future value <strong>of</strong> variables. Clearly, as<strong>in</strong>vestors’ valuations <strong>of</strong> a share are usually <strong>in</strong>formed by theirexpectations, divergent expectations will tend to lead to <strong>in</strong>creases<strong>in</strong> the diversity <strong>of</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion about that share. However, <strong>and</strong> as weshall see below, this need not always be the case.Diverse op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> equity pricesAlthough the prices <strong>of</strong> shares traded on the Stock Exchange appearto be ‘cont<strong>in</strong>uously’ on the move, def<strong>in</strong>ite prices are determ<strong>in</strong>ed atdiscrete po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> time. We shall call these ‘equilibrium’ prices,equilibrium <strong>in</strong> the sense that, at these po<strong>in</strong>ts, market participants(both holders <strong>and</strong> non-holders <strong>of</strong> the share <strong>in</strong> question) do not wantto change their position (Lachmann, 1976:60). In equilibrium, then,all exist<strong>in</strong>g shares are will<strong>in</strong>gly held at the prevail<strong>in</strong>g price. In whatfollows the term ‘average evaluation’ will refer to the average <strong>of</strong> thevalues the <strong>in</strong>dividual market participants attach to a particularshare at some po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time, be they holders or non-holders. 9 As willbecome clearer below, this average evaluation will generally notcorrespond to the market price <strong>of</strong> the share. Optimists will bedef<strong>in</strong>ed as those <strong>in</strong>dividual market participants who value the shareat more than the average evaluation, pessimists as those who valueit at less. Not all optimists need be holders <strong>of</strong> the share.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Miller (1977:1151) ‘the very concept <strong>of</strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty implies that reasonable men may differ <strong>in</strong> theirforecasts’. It then follows that uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty will tend to lead to a188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!