09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LACHMANN’S POLICY ACTIVISMLachmann presents us with quite a set <strong>of</strong> puzzles, <strong>and</strong> it seems onlyfitt<strong>in</strong>g that we should apply the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> charitable<strong>in</strong>terpretation to this subset <strong>of</strong> the writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> its ma<strong>in</strong> adherent <strong>in</strong>order to solve them.In his 1956 book Capital <strong>and</strong> Its Structure, Lachmann providedhis readers with a vision <strong>of</strong> the morphology <strong>of</strong> capital as an order<strong>in</strong> an exposition that was the clearest <strong>of</strong> its time. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on aview <strong>of</strong> capital as physically <strong>and</strong> functionally heterogeneouscomb<strong>in</strong>ations operated by plann<strong>in</strong>g act<strong>in</strong>g human m<strong>in</strong>ds,Lachmann traced out his vision <strong>and</strong> catalogued its implications forthe state <strong>of</strong> capital theory <strong>and</strong> macroeconomic policy. His<strong>in</strong>terpretive <strong>and</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ctly ‘Austrian’ system, thoroughly adheredto, would seem<strong>in</strong>gly deny <strong>in</strong>terventionist macroeconomic policies.Yet <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al analysis, Lachmann’s vision <strong>of</strong> the economy as asystem that does not necessarily possess a tendency towardsequilibrium, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular, his view <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> theprice system, led him to call for policy activism <strong>in</strong> times <strong>of</strong> generaleconomic distress. This is someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a curiosity with<strong>in</strong> theAustrian camp.The purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapter is to trace out Lachmann’s vision <strong>of</strong>capital as an order, stress<strong>in</strong>g along the way those aspects <strong>of</strong> hisvision (<strong>and</strong> the Austrian concept <strong>of</strong> spontaneous order) that mosteffectively deny <strong>in</strong>terventionist macroeconomics <strong>in</strong> order todeterm<strong>in</strong>e whether Lachmann ultimately leaves us with a set <strong>of</strong>policy prescriptions that (despite whatever theoretical validity theymay be said to possess), could not rationally be carried out byanyone. We first present Lachmann s vision <strong>of</strong> capital as an order,<strong>and</strong> note those aspects that are most at odds with aggregatemacroeconomics—the view constitut<strong>in</strong>g the problem environment<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terventionist policy maker. We then emphasise a second set<strong>of</strong> arguments extant <strong>in</strong> Capital <strong>and</strong> Its Structure (1956) (<strong>and</strong>elsewhere <strong>in</strong> Lachmann’s writ<strong>in</strong>gs) concern<strong>in</strong>g the function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>the price system, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular its role <strong>in</strong> any self-correct<strong>in</strong>gtendency <strong>in</strong> the economy, <strong>in</strong> order to develop the sett<strong>in</strong>g forLachmann’s policy advocacy <strong>in</strong> times <strong>of</strong> massive pl<strong>and</strong>iscoord<strong>in</strong>ation. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we survey the possibility <strong>of</strong> reconciliation<strong>and</strong> explore the follow<strong>in</strong>g possibilities: That Lachmann: (1)contradicted himself <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g the validity <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> thepolicy positions he takes; (2) presented us with a fully coherent set <strong>of</strong>policy arguments; (3) established the validity <strong>in</strong> theory <strong>of</strong> the policypositions he takes but left no basis for their rationalimplementation.165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!