09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HIERARCHICAL METAPHORSpioneer<strong>in</strong>g efforts <strong>of</strong> former generations from which we arestill draw<strong>in</strong>g benefit.(Lachmann 1971:68)Lachmann <strong>and</strong> others <strong>in</strong> the Austrian tradition po<strong>in</strong>t to CarlMenger’s (1892) theory <strong>of</strong> money as the exemplary story <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>stitutional emergence <strong>and</strong> evolution. 9An Austrian conception <strong>of</strong> social order sees it as an<strong>in</strong>terconnected set <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions, most spontaneous, some designed<strong>and</strong> all evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> serv<strong>in</strong>g as communicative processes thatenhance the ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals or collectivities (such as firms) t<strong>of</strong>ormulate <strong>and</strong> execute their plans. The next, <strong>and</strong> perhaps moreimportant, question deals with the relationships among all <strong>of</strong> these<strong>in</strong>stitutions. In Lachmann’s (1971:69) words: ‘how can we knowthat these undesigned products <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual pursuit will all becompatible with one another?’ Just how do the various <strong>in</strong>stitutionalarrangements <strong>of</strong> a modern society <strong>in</strong>teract to form what mightlegitimately be called an ‘<strong>in</strong>stitutional order’?Both Lachmann <strong>and</strong> Langlois <strong>of</strong>fer us a way <strong>of</strong> conceptualis<strong>in</strong>gthis order that enables us to say someth<strong>in</strong>g about the relationshipsamong <strong>in</strong>stitutions. For Lachmann, the crucial dist<strong>in</strong>ction isbetween ‘<strong>in</strong>ternal’ <strong>and</strong> ‘external’ <strong>in</strong>stitutions:the undesigned <strong>in</strong>stitutions which evolve gradually as theun<strong>in</strong>tended <strong>and</strong> unforseeable result <strong>of</strong> the pursuit <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<strong>in</strong>terests accumulate <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terstices <strong>of</strong> the legal order. The<strong>in</strong>terstices have been planned, though the sedimentsaccumulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> them have not <strong>and</strong> could not have been. In asociety <strong>of</strong> this type we might then dist<strong>in</strong>guish between theexternal <strong>in</strong>stitutions which constitute, as it were, the outerframework <strong>of</strong> society, the legal order, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternal<strong>in</strong>stitutions which gradually evolve as a result <strong>of</strong> marketprocesses <strong>and</strong> other forms <strong>of</strong> spontaneous <strong>in</strong>dividual action.(Lachmann 1971:81, emphasis <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al)Although Lachmann, on the follow<strong>in</strong>g page, admits someshortcom<strong>in</strong>gs to this scheme, he also claims it is one <strong>in</strong> which a‘praxeological theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions…most readily f<strong>in</strong>ds its place’(ibid.: 81). As seen <strong>in</strong> the lengthy quote above, Lachmann’s primeexample <strong>of</strong> an ‘external’ <strong>in</strong>stitution is the legal order <strong>in</strong> so far asmarket <strong>in</strong>stitutions emerge <strong>and</strong> evolve by tak<strong>in</strong>g the law as a givenframework with<strong>in</strong> which to develop. For example, given the147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!