09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUBJECTIVISM AND IDEAL TYPESconclusions. Nevertheless, this idiosyncratic work must berecognised for what it is: a subtle <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectually stimu-lat<strong>in</strong>gillum<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the problem.(Weber 1975:212)3 Although the logic <strong>of</strong> this reason<strong>in</strong>g is very similar to Hayek’sepistemic argument aga<strong>in</strong>st central plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> socialism, themethodological status <strong>of</strong> the two arguments is very different.4 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lachmann:Natural phenomena exist <strong>in</strong> time <strong>and</strong> space only, <strong>and</strong> observabilityis the only criterion <strong>of</strong> their existence. The fact, on theother h<strong>and</strong>, that human action exists <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> plans, i.e.mental design, permits us to study the relationships betweenhuman action <strong>and</strong> the plans which guide it. The method <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> the social sciences ultimately rests on thepossibility <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the need for, such comparative study. In thissense, then, we may say that we are able to give an ‘<strong>in</strong>telligibleaccount’ <strong>of</strong> human action by reveal<strong>in</strong>g the plans which guide it,a task beyond the grasp <strong>of</strong> the natural sciences. The mere factthat this possibility exists is the foundation <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>and</strong> thus <strong>of</strong>fers a v<strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> the plea for themethodological autonomy <strong>of</strong> the social sciences.(Lachmann 1971:30)5 Cf. Weber:In the economic theory <strong>of</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>al utility <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> every ‘subjective’value theory…there is, to beg<strong>in</strong> with, not an external ‘stimulus’but a ‘need’. This is <strong>of</strong> course the reverse <strong>of</strong> the situation we have<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> the fundamental law <strong>of</strong> psychophysics. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,if we wish to express ourselves <strong>in</strong> ‘psychological’ terms, we dealwith a complex <strong>of</strong> ‘sensations’, ‘feel<strong>in</strong>g-states’, states <strong>of</strong> ‘tension’,‘discomfort’, ‘expectation’, <strong>and</strong> the like, which may at any timebe <strong>of</strong> most <strong>in</strong>tricate character. And these, moreover, comb<strong>in</strong>e with‘<strong>memory</strong> images’, ‘purposes’, <strong>and</strong> perhaps conflict<strong>in</strong>g ‘motives’<strong>of</strong> the most various k<strong>in</strong>ds. Also, while the fundamental law <strong>of</strong>psychophysics <strong>in</strong>structs us about how an external stimulus evokespsychic conditions,…economics, rather, is concerned with thefact that <strong>in</strong> virtue <strong>of</strong> such ‘psychic’ conditions a specificallyoriented external behaviour (action) is evoked.(Weber 1908:27–8)6 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Weber:It is not only that, at least by <strong>and</strong> large, the most generalhypotheses <strong>and</strong> assumptions <strong>of</strong> the ‘natural sciences’ (<strong>in</strong> theusual sense <strong>of</strong> this term) are the most irrelevant ones for ourdiscipl<strong>in</strong>e. But further, <strong>and</strong> above all, precisely as regards the99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!