Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

□ Hazardous Materials□ Noise Impacts□ Air Quality□ DocumentationTechnical Memorandum #3 – Conceptual Drainage Report□ Obtain and Review Existing Reports,□ Determine the existing off-site concentration points and flow magnitudes affecting the baselinealignment.□ Contact appropriate agency personnel to identify and summarize past drainage problems, subsidenceand fissure areas.Technical Memorandum #4 –Candidate Alignments and Evaluation□ Schematic Drawings□ Flow Concentration Points□ Preliminary Cost Estimates□ Evaluation of Final Candidate AlignmentsTechnical Memorandum #5 –Preferred Alignment□ Standard cross section,□ Plan view with corridor study centerline, right of way lines and drainage features shown on an aerialbase map (1” = 200’ scale unless otherwise directed) and printed on 11” x 17” paper,□ Potential areas requiring additional right-of-way,□ Implementation Plan,□ Compute 50- and 100-year discharges at drainage crossing locations for the preferred corridoralignment.Draft Final Report□ Title Page,□ Table of Contents,□ List of Figures,□ List of Tables,□ Executive Summary□ Existing and future corridor features, including:o Corridor Characteristics (natural/man-made),o Roadway Features,o Transportation Network/Travel Demand,o Utilities /Constraints mapping,o Land Use, Ownership and Management,o Environmental summary,o Drainage summary,o Special Analysis Areas,o Relevant Plans/Reports and Guidelines,□ Development and Evaluation of Candidate Alignmentso Candidate Alignments and Evaluation Matrix,o Alignment Schematic Drawings,o Conclusions and Recommendations.EPS Group – Quality Assurance PlanHidden Waters Parkway CFS4