09.07.2015 Views

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

verification <strong>of</strong> verbal conversation, parties to the communication, when it was received, who conveyed it andwho received it. Specifically, communication should be handled in the following ways:All communication should be written and filed, including telephone logs.All written information entering or leaving the <strong>of</strong>fice should be copied to the Project Manager orDeputy Project Manager.Standard distribution lists should be developed for all communication.All calculations and design assumptions shall be documented and filed.One complete copy <strong>of</strong> each submittal should be filed, including plans, specifications, reports,estimates and calculations.Copies <strong>of</strong> all Client review comments shall be scanned and stored in the project electronic file.REVIEW CHECKLISTSProject documents shall be reviewed per the applicable checklists by the originator and the Project Engineer.Checklists used shall be Client specific and applicable to the project type. Project Managers may review thedocuments per the checklists but shall primarily determine compatibility with the project scope,compatibility to agreed design concepts, identify potential design conflicts, and assess constructability.Specific checklists for the Hidden Waters CFS documents per the scope <strong>of</strong> work are as follows:<strong>Work</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>□ Schedule,□ Study area boundary,□ Study purpose and objectives,□ Study process and approach used to meet objectives,□ Data collection plan,□ Design standards and guidelines,□ Stakeholder database,□ Key issues and challenges,□ Detailed study tasks,□ Criteria for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternatives,□ Scoping report summary,□ Written quality assurance/quality control planTechnical Memorandum #1 – Existing and Future Corridor Features□ Physical Features□ Existing Corridor Roadway Conditions□ Existing Approved Access Conditions and Policies/Guidelines□ Existing and Future Roadway Network Information□ Land Use, Jurisdictional Control, Ownership, and Management□ Relevant <strong>Plan</strong>s, Reports, Guidelines, Studies and Standards□ Existing Topography/Mapping□ Identification <strong>of</strong> Special Interest AreasTechnical Memorandum #2 – Environmental Overview□ Cultural Resources□ Biology□ Land Use/Socioeconomic/Visual Quality□ Water QualityEPS Group – Quality Assurance <strong>Plan</strong>Hidden Waters Parkway CFS3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!